Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -173.8%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10M | $21M | $87M | $295M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8M | $18M | $87M | $296M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.05 | 1.69 | 8.03 | 58.91 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.33 | 4.83 | 13.88 | 73.65 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.46 | 8.00 | 59.07 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 31.9% | 40.5% | 34.4% | 33.0% | 54.5% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | -36.8% | -36.8% | -40.3% | -106.8% | -46.0% | -53.5% | -79.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -75.2% | -75.2% | -39.8% | -109.3% | -43.5% | -41.6% | -58.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -173.8% | -173.8% | -84.2% | -601.2% | — | -211.0% | — |
| ROA | -92.3% | -92.3% | -41.1% | -87.7% | -130.9% | -115.9% | -296.1% |
| ROIC | -91.8% | -91.8% | -61.1% | -129.8% | -224.0% | -438.2% | — |
| ROCE | -54.7% | -54.7% | -53.9% | -169.1% | -1646.1% | -595.1% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.25 | — | 1.35 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.66 | -0.06 | 0.21 | — | -0.06 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -588.16 | -588.16 | -112.25 | -173.04 | -77.52 | -36.92 | -68.09 |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.50 | 4.50 | 0.93 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 2.73 | 0.30 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.50 | 4.50 | 0.93 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 2.73 | 0.30 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.39 | 3.39 | 0.54 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 1.45 | 0.11 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.34 | 1.01 | 0.49 | 3.24 | 1.76 | 5.10 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 90.95 | — | 180.21 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $26M | $22M | $19M | $19M | $16M | $16M |
Liquidity and cash exhaustion
According to recent market data, OMH trades at a P/S multiple of 1.57, which appears to discount the company's inability to generate positive earnings, suggesting that investors are pricing the firm as a speculative growth play rather than a stable, cash-generative real estate services provider.
The negative P/E ratio of -2.31 confirms that the market is currently unable to assign a traditional earnings-based valuation, reflecting the firm's persistent net losses. This valuation level warrants caution, as it implies a reliance on future growth that remains unproven in the face of current revenue contraction.
Based on reported figures, OMH's ROIC of -70.6% in 2025Q4 highlights a severe destruction of shareholder value, as the company's investments in platform expansion and regional growth have failed to yield returns that exceed the cost of capital or even reach break-even operational levels.
The trend in ROIC over the last ten quarters indicates a lack of compounding capability, with returns consistently trapped in negative territory. This suggests that the firm's current business model is structurally inefficient, requiring significant capital injections that do not translate into improved operational performance.
As reported in financial statements, OMH's asset turnover ratio has declined to 0.31 in 2025Q4, indicating that the company is struggling to generate sufficient revenue from its existing asset base compared to historical levels, which previously reached as high as 2.55 in 2020Q4.
This downward trend in asset utilization suggests that the firm's investments in technology and regional expansion are not yet driving the expected transaction density. Investors should monitor whether this efficiency gap is a temporary byproduct of market entry or a permanent feature of the company's service-heavy model.
According to recent SEC filings, OMH's current ratio of 4.50 may provide a misleading sense of security, as the company's cash burn rate and persistent net losses suggest that its liquid assets are rapidly depleting against a backdrop of high fixed operational costs.
While the current ratio appears elevated, the underlying cash position of $4.5M is insufficient to sustain the current rate of operational deficit for an extended period. This liquidity profile indicates that the firm may face significant refinancing or capital-raising risks in the near term.
Based on an analysis of OMH's business model, the most commonly misapplied metric is the P/S ratio, which erroneously treats the company as a high-margin software platform rather than a labor-intensive brokerage service that requires significant human capital and regulatory compliance to execute transactions.
Using software-style multiples obscures the reality that OMH's revenue is tied to transactional brokerage, which lacks the scalability of SaaS models. Analysts should instead focus on unit economics, such as CAC-to-LTV ratios, to better understand the true sustainability of the company's service-led growth strategy.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OMH stock.
Ohmyhome Limited's current P/E ratio is -1.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Ohmyhome Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -173.8%. The historical average is -156.3%.
Based on historical data, Ohmyhome Limited is trading at a P/E of -1.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ohmyhome Limited has 31.9% gross margin and -36.8% operating margin.