VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
ODV
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
ODVOsisko Development Corp.
$2.43$356M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. ODV
  4. Financial Ratios

Osisko Development Corp. (ODV) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -27.0%. (2014–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

ODV Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Market Cap$356M$622M$153M$240M$274M$425M$682M————
Enterprise Value$409M$698M$93M$215M$187M$406M$487M————
P/E Ratio →-3.64——————————
P/S Ratio14.2617.5433.547.594.2855.54—————
P/B Ratio0.900.910.270.410.380.730.98————
P/FCF———————————
P/OCF———————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

ODV EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
EV / Revenue—19.7020.386.802.9352.96—————
EV / EBITDA———————————
EV / EBIT———————————
EV / FCF———————————

ODV Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Gross Margin-71.1%-71.1%-11.4%-2.8%11.3%-1.6%—————
Operating Margin-151.1%-151.1%-1607.6%-662.3%-365.8%-2054.1%—————
Net Profit Margin-476.4%-476.4%-1893.5%-575.1%-300.5%-1740.0%—————

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
ROE-27.0%-27.0%-14.9%-27.6%-29.3%-20.8%-1.5%-42.6%-1515.5%——
ROA-15.9%-15.9%-10.7%-21.0%-23.0%-17.7%-1.3%-38.1%-2179.7%-1303.9%-36.9%
ROIC-6.3%-6.3%-10.3%-26.1%-29.1%-22.1%-1.5%-23.3%———
ROCE-6.5%-6.5%-10.3%-25.8%-29.7%-22.2%-1.5%-28.0%-351.2%——

ODV Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Debt / Equity0.210.210.080.030.030.020.00————
Debt / EBITDA———————————
Net Debt / Equity—0.11-0.11-0.04-0.12-0.03-0.28-0.02-1.23——
Net Debt / EBITDA————————-0.02——
Debt / FCF———————————
Interest Coverage-8.04-8.04-3.90-14.28-32.11-194.29-11.55—-60390.07-563.61-259.50

ODV Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Current Ratio1.451.450.851.182.771.475.101.463.950.020.03
Quick Ratio1.421.420.791.062.421.024.871.3312.880.020.03
Cash Ratio1.271.270.740.762.080.804.610.643.620.000.02
Asset Turnover—0.030.010.040.070.01—————
Inventory Turnover7.747.740.584.513.220.42—————
Days Sales Outstanding—96.27205.6345.6162.95378.82—————

ODV Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Earnings Yield———————————
FCF Yield———————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%————
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%————
Shares Outstanding—$178M$94M$82M$64M$44M$38M$38M$55153$11134$11134

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Pre-commercial liquidity constraints

Speculative Premium Over Book Value

According to reported financial data, ODV trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.89, suggesting that the market is currently discounting the company's asset base below its carrying value, likely reflecting deep skepticism regarding the near-term economic viability of its multi-jurisdictional development pipeline.

The P/S ratio of 14.06 appears exceptionally high for a company lacking steady-state commercial production, indicating that investors are pricing the stock as a long-dated exploration call option rather than a fundamental business. This valuation disconnect warrants further investigation, as it implies that the market expects significant future resource expansion or a successful transition to production that is not yet supported by current operational cash flows.

Negative Returns Reflect Capital Intensity

Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming out at -22.1% in 2023Q4, which highlights the structural challenge of deploying massive capital into early-stage mining projects that have yet to achieve the economies of scale necessary for positive returns.

The inability to generate positive returns on invested capital suggests that the current development strategy is value-destructive in the short term, as the cost of capital significantly exceeds the returns from test mining activities. Investors should monitor whether the eventual transition to commercial production at Cariboo can reverse this trend, or if the fragmented nature of the portfolio will continue to dilute capital efficiency.

Working Capital Cycles Remain Erratic

As indicated by quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has shown extreme volatility, swinging from 32 days in 2023Q4 to a negative 3,882 days in 2026Q1, reflecting the highly irregular nature of test mining and the lack of a standardized operational production cycle.

The massive fluctuations in days inventory outstanding and days payable outstanding suggest that the company's working capital management is currently dictated by project-specific milestones rather than recurring operational efficiency. This lack of a predictable cycle makes it difficult to forecast liquidity needs, and the current trends appear to be a byproduct of the company's transition phase rather than a sustainable operational strategy.

Debt Service Capacity Remains Strained

According to recent financial statements, the company's interest coverage ratio has remained deeply negative, reaching -5.19 in 2026Q1, which underscores the significant risk that current operating losses may be insufficient to cover debt service obligations without further external financing or asset monetization.

While the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16 appears manageable in isolation, the lack of consistent EBITDA generation makes the company's leverage profile appear more vulnerable than the headline numbers suggest. The reliance on debt to bridge the development gap warrants further investigation, as any delay in project timelines could force the company into a liquidity crunch or necessitate dilutive equity raises.

Misapplication of P/S Multiples

The price-to-sales ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for ODV, as it obscures the reality that current revenue is derived from incidental test mining rather than commercial production, leading to a distorted view of the company's true revenue-generating potential.

Investors should instead focus on the net present value of proven and probable reserves and the all-in sustaining cost projections, as these metrics better capture the long-term economic value of the Cariboo and Tintic assets. Relying on P/S ratios for a pre-commercial miner risks overestimating the company's current operational health and ignoring the significant capital expenditures required to reach steady-state production.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

ODV — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ODV stock.

What is Osisko Development Corp.'s P/E ratio?

Osisko Development Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -3.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is Osisko Development Corp.'s ROE?

Osisko Development Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -27.0%. The historical average is -23.4%.

Is ODV stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Osisko Development Corp. is trading at a P/E of -3.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Osisko Development Corp.'s profit margins?

Osisko Development Corp. has -71.1% gross margin and -151.1% operating margin.