Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -27.0%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $356M | $622M | $153M | $240M | $274M | $425M | $682M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $409M | $698M | $93M | $215M | $187M | $406M | $487M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 14.26 | 17.54 | 33.54 | 7.59 | 4.28 | 55.54 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.73 | 0.98 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 19.70 | 20.38 | 6.80 | 2.93 | 52.96 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -71.1% | -71.1% | -11.4% | -2.8% | 11.3% | -1.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -151.1% | -151.1% | -1607.6% | -662.3% | -365.8% | -2054.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -476.4% | -476.4% | -1893.5% | -575.1% | -300.5% | -1740.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -27.0% | -27.0% | -14.9% | -27.6% | -29.3% | -20.8% | -1.5% | -42.6% | -1515.5% | — | — |
| ROA | -15.9% | -15.9% | -10.7% | -21.0% | -23.0% | -17.7% | -1.3% | -38.1% | -2179.7% | -1303.9% | -36.9% |
| ROIC | -6.3% | -6.3% | -10.3% | -26.1% | -29.1% | -22.1% | -1.5% | -23.3% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -6.5% | -6.5% | -10.3% | -25.8% | -29.7% | -22.2% | -1.5% | -28.0% | -351.2% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.11 | -0.11 | -0.04 | -0.12 | -0.03 | -0.28 | -0.02 | -1.23 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.02 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -8.04 | -8.04 | -3.90 | -14.28 | -32.11 | -194.29 | -11.55 | — | -60390.07 | -563.61 | -259.50 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.85 | 1.18 | 2.77 | 1.47 | 5.10 | 1.46 | 3.95 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.79 | 1.06 | 2.42 | 1.02 | 4.87 | 1.33 | 12.88 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 2.08 | 0.80 | 4.61 | 0.64 | 3.62 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.74 | 7.74 | 0.58 | 4.51 | 3.22 | 0.42 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 96.27 | 205.63 | 45.61 | 62.95 | 378.82 | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $178M | $94M | $82M | $64M | $44M | $38M | $38M | $55153 | $11134 | $11134 |
Pre-commercial liquidity constraints
According to reported financial data, ODV trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.89, suggesting that the market is currently discounting the company's asset base below its carrying value, likely reflecting deep skepticism regarding the near-term economic viability of its multi-jurisdictional development pipeline.
The P/S ratio of 14.06 appears exceptionally high for a company lacking steady-state commercial production, indicating that investors are pricing the stock as a long-dated exploration call option rather than a fundamental business. This valuation disconnect warrants further investigation, as it implies that the market expects significant future resource expansion or a successful transition to production that is not yet supported by current operational cash flows.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming out at -22.1% in 2023Q4, which highlights the structural challenge of deploying massive capital into early-stage mining projects that have yet to achieve the economies of scale necessary for positive returns.
The inability to generate positive returns on invested capital suggests that the current development strategy is value-destructive in the short term, as the cost of capital significantly exceeds the returns from test mining activities. Investors should monitor whether the eventual transition to commercial production at Cariboo can reverse this trend, or if the fragmented nature of the portfolio will continue to dilute capital efficiency.
As indicated by quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has shown extreme volatility, swinging from 32 days in 2023Q4 to a negative 3,882 days in 2026Q1, reflecting the highly irregular nature of test mining and the lack of a standardized operational production cycle.
The massive fluctuations in days inventory outstanding and days payable outstanding suggest that the company's working capital management is currently dictated by project-specific milestones rather than recurring operational efficiency. This lack of a predictable cycle makes it difficult to forecast liquidity needs, and the current trends appear to be a byproduct of the company's transition phase rather than a sustainable operational strategy.
According to recent financial statements, the company's interest coverage ratio has remained deeply negative, reaching -5.19 in 2026Q1, which underscores the significant risk that current operating losses may be insufficient to cover debt service obligations without further external financing or asset monetization.
While the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16 appears manageable in isolation, the lack of consistent EBITDA generation makes the company's leverage profile appear more vulnerable than the headline numbers suggest. The reliance on debt to bridge the development gap warrants further investigation, as any delay in project timelines could force the company into a liquidity crunch or necessitate dilutive equity raises.
The price-to-sales ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for ODV, as it obscures the reality that current revenue is derived from incidental test mining rather than commercial production, leading to a distorted view of the company's true revenue-generating potential.
Investors should instead focus on the net present value of proven and probable reserves and the all-in sustaining cost projections, as these metrics better capture the long-term economic value of the Cariboo and Tintic assets. Relying on P/S ratios for a pre-commercial miner risks overestimating the company's current operational health and ignoring the significant capital expenditures required to reach steady-state production.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ODV stock.
Osisko Development Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -3.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Osisko Development Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -27.0%. The historical average is -23.4%.
Based on historical data, Osisko Development Corp. is trading at a P/E of -3.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Osisko Development Corp. has -71.1% gross margin and -151.1% operating margin.