Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.3x · EV/EBITDA 14.6x · ROE 7.2%. (1995–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.2B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.4B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $2.1B | $2.6B | $911M | $1.2B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $1.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.34 | 13.04 | 16.70 | 11.77 | 13.31 | 11.70 | 20.55 | 15.99 | 16.61 | 18.18 | 36.80 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.51 | 2.01 | 2.22 | 2.26 | 3.18 | 3.37 | 2.72 | 3.42 | 3.77 | 3.68 | 4.24 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.17 | 0.93 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 1.19 | 1.14 | 1.00 | 1.30 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 1.55 |
| P/FCF | 15.51 | 12.42 | 13.36 | 18.79 | 10.35 | 9.57 | 11.95 | 15.10 | 13.12 | 11.59 | 15.06 |
| P/OCF | 14.33 | 11.48 | 13.11 | 17.06 | 10.10 | 8.75 | 10.91 | 13.81 | 12.63 | 11.30 | 13.37 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.25 | 2.43 | 3.01 | 4.58 | 1.71 | 2.14 | 4.02 | 4.37 | 3.98 | 3.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.62 | 11.96 | 12.13 | 10.55 | 14.19 | 4.38 | 12.41 | 14.26 | 14.30 | 12.37 | 19.36 |
| EV / EBIT | 14.64 | 11.97 | 14.13 | 12.02 | 14.72 | 4.53 | 13.05 | 14.65 | 15.17 | 13.67 | 23.55 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.92 | 14.60 | 24.97 | 14.94 | 4.85 | 9.42 | 17.74 | 15.20 | 12.55 | 13.94 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 68.3% | 68.3% | 65.8% | 75.0% | 89.9% | 97.9% | 77.6% | 84.5% | 87.6% | 89.7% | 87.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 18.8% | 17.2% | 25.0% | 31.1% | 37.7% | 16.4% | 27.4% | 28.8% | 29.1% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.4% | 14.4% | 13.3% | 19.3% | 24.0% | 28.9% | 13.3% | 21.5% | 22.7% | 20.3% | 11.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.2% | 7.2% | 6.4% | 8.9% | 8.7% | 9.9% | 5.2% | 8.5% | 8.6% | 7.9% | 4.3% |
| ROA | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.5% |
| ROIC | 5.6% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 5.7% | 5.9% | 7.7% | 3.8% | 6.4% | 6.6% | 7.1% | 2.9% |
| ROCE | 6.8% | 6.8% | 6.3% | 8.8% | 8.6% | 9.7% | 4.8% | 8.6% | 9.2% | 9.0% | 3.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.62 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.71 | 2.71 | 2.95 | 3.22 | 5.13 | 1.89 | 4.23 | 2.54 | 2.43 | 1.46 | 2.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.56 | -0.21 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.12 | -0.12 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.04 | 2.61 | 4.36 | -4.27 | -3.34 | 2.12 | 1.95 | 0.94 | -1.57 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.50 | 1.25 | 6.17 | 4.59 | -4.72 | -2.53 | 2.64 | 2.07 | 0.96 | -1.13 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 1.15 | 6.18 | 7.38 | 2.19 | 2.48 | 3.61 | 4.84 | 1.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.15 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.0% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 6.4% | 5.7% | 5.6% | 6.1% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 87.2% | 87.2% | 101.6% | 75.3% | 75.9% | 65.0% | 124.4% | 69.0% | 66.3% | 69.0% | 121.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.1% | 7.7% | 6.0% | 8.5% | 7.5% | 8.5% | 4.9% | 6.3% | 6.0% | 5.5% | 2.7% |
| FCF Yield | 6.4% | 8.1% | 7.5% | 5.3% | 9.7% | 10.5% | 8.4% | 6.6% | 7.6% | 8.6% | 6.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.0% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 6.4% | 5.7% | 6.9% | 6.7% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 3.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $147M | $127M | $127M | $127M | $127M | $120M | $106M | $104M | $103M | $101M |
Securities portfolio duration risk
Based on recent market data, Northwest Bancshares trades at a P/B of 1.17, which suggests that investors are pricing the bank as a commodity balance sheet rather than a premium franchise, likely reflecting skepticism regarding the bank's ability to generate superior returns on tangible equity.
The current valuation multiple appears to be constrained by the bank's historical thrift-like performance, which has struggled to consistently exceed its cost of capital. Investors should monitor whether the strategic pivot to Columbus, Ohio, can catalyze a re-rating by demonstrating higher organic growth potential than the bank's legacy rural markets.
As reported in financial statements, the bank's ROE has remained muted, often hovering near 2% in recent quarters, which indicates that the combination of low asset utilization and a conservative capital structure is significantly dampening the bank's overall profitability relative to its regional peers.
The DuPont decomposition suggests that while the bank maintains a stable NIM, the lack of aggressive leverage and the high fixed-cost overhead of its branch network prevent a meaningful expansion in ROE. This performance profile warrants further investigation into whether the bank's current operating model can support the higher margins required for modern commercial banking.
According to quarterly filings, the efficiency ratio has fluctuated between 43.8% and 58.7% over the last ten quarters, suggesting that the bank's high fixed-cost branch network remains a persistent challenge to achieving the operating leverage necessary to improve bottom-line profitability in a competitive rate environment.
While the bank has shown an ability to protect its NIM through asset repricing, the inability to consistently drive the efficiency ratio lower indicates that legacy occupancy and personnel costs are not scaling effectively. Investors should monitor whether management can rationalize the branch footprint without sacrificing the core deposit base that currently supports the bank's funding advantage.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, the bank maintains a consistent equity-to-assets ratio of 0.11, which provides a fortress-like buffer against credit volatility but appears to act as a structural drag on the bank's ability to optimize its return on equity for shareholders.
This high capital adequacy level suggests that the bank is well-positioned to absorb potential losses from its securities portfolio or credit cycle downturns. However, the lack of leverage may indicate that the bank is under-utilizing its balance sheet, potentially limiting its capacity to compete aggressively in higher-growth urban markets.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for Northwest Bancshares, as it fails to account for the significant volatility introduced by CECL-related provision charges, which can create artificial swings in earnings that do not reflect the bank's underlying operational health or long-term cash generation.
Investors should instead prioritize P/TBV and normalized ROE, as these metrics provide a clearer view of the bank's intrinsic value and capital efficiency. Relying on P/E in this context may lead to erroneous conclusions about the bank's profitability, as it ignores the non-cash nature of credit provisioning that frequently distorts the bottom line.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NWBI stock.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 16.3x. The historical average is 21.0x. This places it at the 23th percentile of its historical range.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.6x.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.2%. The historical average is 7.7%.
Based on historical data, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 16.3x. This is at the 23th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 4.98% with a payout ratio of 87.2%.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. has 68.3% gross margin and 18.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.