Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 65.6x · EV/EBITDA 14.8x · ROE 4.5%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.5B | $2.2B | $2.9B | $6.1B | $3.3B | $9.3B | $2.4B | $2.0B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.9B | $5.6B | $6.3B | $9.7B | $6.8B | $12.2B | $4.4B | $3.5B | $2.7B | $2.2B | $2.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 65.63 | 40.30 | 32.13 | 28.02 | 36.48 | 63.49 | 67.98 | 29.75 | 101.77 | 2726.00 | 71.19 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.71 | 2.87 | 3.78 | 7.06 | 4.11 | 15.90 | 5.55 | 5.11 | 4.26 | 4.52 | 8.73 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.30 | 1.41 | 1.65 | 2.85 | 1.38 | 3.75 | 1.68 | 1.35 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 1.78 |
| P/FCF | 11.82 | 7.21 | 8.51 | 14.91 | 8.24 | 30.69 | 11.77 | 11.17 | 9.90 | 11.11 | 20.90 |
| P/OCF | 10.47 | 6.39 | 8.02 | 13.71 | 7.42 | 28.10 | 10.88 | 9.95 | 8.72 | 9.74 | 18.28 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.39 | 8.22 | 11.27 | 8.53 | 20.92 | 10.18 | 9.12 | 8.08 | 8.04 | 13.08 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.84 | 11.89 | 13.01 | 17.31 | 13.08 | 32.53 | 16.87 | 10.51 | 8.04 | 8.11 | 13.26 |
| EV / EBIT | 24.93 | 19.75 | 18.56 | 23.90 | 22.86 | 55.51 | 30.62 | 28.96 | 26.79 | 26.54 | 52.78 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.56 | 18.50 | 23.82 | 17.09 | 40.38 | 21.58 | 19.93 | 18.79 | 19.77 | 31.33 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.0% | 46.0% | 72.5% | 73.3% | 73.7% | 73.5% | 71.4% | 72.2% | 68.6% | 68.5% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 37.0% | 38.6% | 39.2% | 36.1% | 37.3% | — | 59.3% | 30.7% | 29.3% | 29.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.8% | 9.8% | 14.5% | 18.3% | 12.9% | 18.0% | 11.2% | 1.0% | 4.3% | 1.1% | 9.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.5% | 4.5% | 5.7% | 6.9% | 4.3% | 5.4% | 3.4% | 0.3% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 2.4% |
| ROA | 1.4% | 1.4% | 2.0% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.1% | 1.2% |
| ROIC | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 3.7% | — | 6.0% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| ROCE | 5.9% | 5.9% | 5.8% | 6.2% | 5.5% | 5.2% | — | 7.8% | 4.3% | 4.2% | 4.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.23 | 2.23 | 1.97 | 1.73 | 1.50 | 1.19 | 1.41 | 1.07 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.90 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.32 | 7.32 | 7.13 | 6.59 | 6.84 | 7.87 | 7.74 | 4.69 | 3.84 | 3.60 | 4.48 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.22 | 1.94 | 1.70 | 1.48 | 1.18 | 1.40 | 1.06 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 0.88 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.27 | 7.27 | 7.03 | 6.47 | 6.78 | 7.81 | 7.67 | 4.62 | 3.80 | 3.55 | 4.41 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 11.35 | 9.99 | 8.91 | 8.85 | 9.69 | 9.81 | 8.76 | 8.88 | 8.66 | 10.42 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.73 | 1.73 | 2.21 | 2.44 | 2.70 | 3.06 | 2.30 | 2.14 | 2.34 | 2.38 | 2.05 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 1.35 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.82 | — | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 1.35 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.82 | — | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.38 | — | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 54.31 | 4.65 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.0% | 8.1% | 5.9% | 3.2% | 5.9% | 1.4% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 237.1% | 237.1% | 154.1% | 121.9% | 188.6% | 125.1% | 185.4% | 1871.6% | 440.5% | 1610.0% | 148.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.5% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 3.4% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| FCF Yield | 8.5% | 13.9% | 11.8% | 6.7% | 12.1% | 3.3% | 8.5% | 9.0% | 10.1% | 9.0% | 4.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9.8% | 5.1% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.0% | 8.1% | 15.7% | 8.3% | 8.7% | 1.4% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 1.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $77M | $77M | $146M | $91M | $135M | $67M | $58M | $53M | $44M | $79M |
PRO structure earnings volatility
According to recent market data, NSA's P/FFO multiple has trended downward from 24.18 in 2024Q2 to 19.13 in 2026Q1, reflecting investor skepticism regarding the company's ability to sustain historical growth rates within its decentralized PRO-based operating model during a period of softening demand.
The contraction in valuation multiples suggests that the market is applying a risk premium to NSA's unique structure, likely due to the lack of transparency in earnings quality compared to larger, centralized peers. Investors should monitor whether the current implied cap rate provides a sufficient margin of safety given the persistent revenue headwinds and the potential for further multiple compression if organic growth remains elusive.
Based on reported quarterly figures, NSA's NOI margin has exhibited significant instability, including a sharp decline to -28.7% in 2025Q4, which suggests that the company's property-level expense management is struggling to maintain efficiency amidst a broader environment of rising operational costs and cooling rental demand.
The erratic nature of these margins implies that the PRO structure may be creating operational friction that prevents consistent cost control across the portfolio. Analysts should investigate whether these margin swings are driven by non-recurring accounting adjustments or if they represent a fundamental deterioration in the profitability of the underlying storage assets.
As indicated by the company's financial statements, the FFO payout ratio has trended upward from 37.4% in 2023Q4 to 58.8% in 2026Q1, signaling a narrowing buffer that warrants close monitoring of the sustainability of current distribution levels during this period of revenue contraction.
While the payout ratio remains within a manageable range, the consistent upward trend suggests that dividend growth may be constrained until the company can restore organic FFO expansion. Investors should consider whether the current dividend yield is adequately compensated by the risk of further cash flow volatility inherent in the PRO-based acquisition model.
According to recent SEC filings, NSA's debt-to-equity ratio reached 2.23 in 2025Q4, a figure that appears significantly elevated compared to historical norms and suggests a heightened reliance on debt to fund operations and acquisitions in a challenging market environment.
This leverage profile appears to limit the company's financial flexibility, particularly as interest coverage ratios have shown signs of weakening from 3.35 in 2023Q4 to 0.72 in 2026Q1. The combination of high debt levels and declining interest coverage warrants further investigation into the company's refinancing risk and its ability to maintain its current capital structure.
The most commonly misapplied metric for NSA is the standard P/E ratio, which fails to account for the significant non-cash depreciation charges inherent in the REIT business model and obscures the true economic earnings generated by the company's self-storage portfolio.
Using P/E to evaluate NSA is deeply misleading because it ignores the company's ability to generate cash flow in excess of its accounting earnings, which are heavily impacted by the PRO structure's unique accounting treatment. Analysts should instead focus on P/FFO or P/AFFO, which provide a more accurate reflection of the company's recurring cash-generating capacity and dividend-paying ability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NSA stock.
National Storage Affiliates Trust's current P/E ratio is 65.6x. The historical average is 56.1x. This places it at the 60th percentile of its historical range.
National Storage Affiliates Trust's current EV/EBITDA is 14.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.3x.
National Storage Affiliates Trust's return on equity (ROE) is 4.5%. The historical average is 2.9%.
Based on historical data, National Storage Affiliates Trust is trading at a P/E of 65.6x. This is at the 60th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
National Storage Affiliates Trust's current dividend yield is 4.97% with a payout ratio of 237.1%.
National Storage Affiliates Trust has 46.0% gross margin and 37.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
National Storage Affiliates Trust's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.