Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.0x · EV/EBITDA 5.2x · ROE 8.4%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $371M | $339M | $272M | $293M | $283M | $524M | $274M | $300M | $230M | $210M | $129M |
| Enterprise Value | $205M | $172M | $31M | $-19869680 | $439M | $298M | $52M | $497M | $440M | $383M | $247M |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.03 | 12.54 | 13.53 | 9.40 | 18.82 | 13.39 | 7.41 | 11.33 | 18.04 | 29.56 | 9.77 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.37 | 1.25 | 1.20 | 1.38 | 1.86 | 4.72 | 2.13 | 2.09 | 2.19 | 2.23 | 1.37 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.13 | 1.01 | 0.89 | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.90 | 1.14 | 1.42 | 1.30 | 1.40 | 0.89 |
| P/FCF | 175.81 | 160.21 | — | 5.21 | 65.73 | 17.49 | 2.60 | — | 57.36 | 7.33 | 5.46 |
| P/OCF | 92.23 | 84.04 | — | 5.04 | 38.54 | 15.04 | 2.44 | — | 34.29 | 6.34 | 5.10 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.64 | 0.13 | -0.09 | 2.88 | 2.68 | 0.40 | 3.45 | 4.20 | 4.07 | 2.62 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.19 | 4.35 | 1.01 | -0.62 | 21.55 | 5.77 | 1.04 | 12.98 | 24.02 | 25.49 | 14.71 |
| EV / EBIT | 5.56 | 4.66 | 1.16 | -0.73 | 29.18 | 6.28 | 1.11 | 14.19 | 28.61 | 31.05 | 18.47 |
| EV / FCF | — | 81.29 | — | -0.35 | 101.71 | 9.95 | 0.49 | — | 109.93 | 13.37 | 10.45 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71.7% | 71.7% | 64.7% | 69.7% | 81.4% | 100.0% | 78.1% | 82.8% | 80.8% | 84.6% | 84.3% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | 13.6% | 11.6% | 12.8% | 9.9% | 42.7% | 36.5% | 24.3% | 14.7% | 13.1% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.0% | 10.0% | 8.8% | 14.7% | 9.9% | 35.2% | 29.1% | 18.8% | 11.4% | 8.1% | 13.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.4% | 8.4% | 6.8% | 11.3% | 5.6% | 15.2% | 16.6% | 13.9% | 7.3% | 5.1% | 9.9% |
| ROA | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| ROIC | 7.0% | 7.0% | 5.2% | 4.9% | 2.8% | 10.9% | 9.5% | 6.0% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 3.1% |
| ROCE | 8.2% | 8.2% | 6.3% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 15.1% | 10.3% | 6.8% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.75 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 1.12 | 1.40 | 1.39 | 1.03 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.96 | 1.96 | 2.53 | 2.64 | 9.60 | 1.63 | 1.07 | 6.20 | 13.51 | 13.85 | 8.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.50 | -0.79 | -1.08 | 0.59 | -0.82 | -0.93 | 0.93 | 1.19 | 1.15 | 0.81 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -4.23 | -4.23 | -7.97 | -9.69 | 7.62 | -4.37 | -4.42 | 5.14 | 11.49 | 11.52 | 7.02 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -78.92 | — | -5.56 | 35.98 | -7.54 | -2.10 | — | 52.57 | 6.04 | 4.99 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 1.06 | 7.57 | 4.04 | 1.52 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 1.20 |
Net cash position: cash ($244M) exceeds total debt ($77M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.19 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.19 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.3% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 1.2% | 1.6% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 32.3% | 32.3% | 43.7% | 27.7% | 55.5% | 15.4% | 11.4% | 8.5% | 10.2% | 13.6% | 5.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.1% | 8.0% | 7.4% | 10.6% | 5.3% | 7.5% | 13.5% | 8.8% | 5.5% | 3.4% | 10.2% |
| FCF Yield | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 19.2% | 1.5% | 5.7% | 38.5% | — | 1.7% | 13.6% | 18.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.7% | 3.0% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 5.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.0% | 5.6% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 1.2% | 7.3% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $12M | $12M | $13M | $10M | $10M |
Regulatory BaaS compliance exposure
Trading at a P/B of 1.14, MVBF's valuation appears to discount the bank's specialized fintech integration, as reported in recent market data, suggesting investors remain cautious regarding the sustainability of fee-heavy revenue streams compared to traditional regional banking peers that often command higher multiples.
The current P/B multiple indicates that the market is not yet pricing MVBF as a high-growth tech-utility, but rather as a traditional bank with elevated operational complexity. This valuation suggests that investors are waiting for more consistent ROTCE performance before assigning a premium, as the current earnings volatility complicates long-term return projections.
Based on quarterly financial disclosures, MVBF's ROE has struggled to exceed 5.4% in the last ten quarters, indicating that the bank's profitability is currently constrained by high operating expenses and inconsistent fee income contributions that fail to fully leverage the underlying asset base.
The decomposition of profitability highlights that while the bank maintains a unique fee-heavy model, the high efficiency ratios suggest that the cost of maintaining specialized compliance infrastructure is eroding potential margins. Investors should monitor whether the bank can achieve greater scale in its fintech segment to improve operating leverage and stabilize ROE.
According to historical efficiency ratios ranging between 51% and 56%, MVBF appears to be grappling with significant fixed costs, which, as noted in recent regulatory filings, limits the operating leverage typically expected from a high-growth fintech-integrated banking model in the current interest rate environment.
The persistent NIM compression, hovering near 0.8% to 0.9%, suggests that the bank faces structural challenges in balancing asset yields against the funding costs of its specialized deposit base. This indicates that the bank's profitability is highly sensitive to its ability to manage non-interest expenses effectively.
As reported in financial statements, MVBF's equity-to-assets ratio has remained consistently constrained between 0.08 and 0.10, suggesting that the bank operates with a relatively thin capital buffer that warrants further investigation regarding its capacity to absorb potential shocks from its complex business lines.
The bank's capital position appears adequate for its current risk profile, but the lack of significant capital accumulation suggests limited flexibility for aggressive expansion or capital returns. Maintaining this ratio is critical, as any regulatory shift in capital requirements could necessitate a pivot in the bank's growth strategy.
Investors frequently misapply the P/E ratio to MVBF, as evidenced by the volatility in net income caused by non-recurring investment gains and provision adjustments, which, according to financial analysis, obscures the underlying core banking performance and the true earnings power of the fintech-integrated model.
The P/E ratio is particularly misleading for MVBF because it fails to account for the non-cash valuation adjustments within the Financial Holding Company segment. A more appropriate focus would be on tangible book value growth and fee-based revenue stability, which provide a clearer picture of the bank's long-term franchise value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MVBF stock.
MVB Financial Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 14.0x. The historical average is 19.1x. This places it at the 56th percentile of its historical range.
MVB Financial Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.9x.
MVB Financial Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.4%. The historical average is 7.9%.
Based on historical data, MVB Financial Corp. is trading at a P/E of 14.0x. This is at the 56th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MVB Financial Corp.'s current dividend yield is 2.30% with a payout ratio of 32.3%.
MVB Financial Corp. has 71.7% gross margin and 13.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
MVB Financial Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.