Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA 3.4x · ROE -11.7%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $44456 | $6M | $36M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1M | $7M | $36M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.00 | 0.49 | 3.61 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.26 | 4.32 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 123.70 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.61 | 3.54 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.42 | 16.69 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 22.5% | 30.3% | 40.7% | 49.2% | 51.9% | 59.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | -2.6% | -50.5% | 21.4% | 29.7% | 37.1% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -15.3% | -15.3% | -56.1% | 18.5% | 26.8% | 33.5% | 44.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -11.7% | -11.7% | -71.4% | 36.2% | 39.6% | 78.4% | 95.1% |
| ROA | -7.9% | -7.9% | -46.0% | 24.8% | 23.5% | 38.3% | 33.4% |
| ROIC | -1.5% | -1.5% | -52.9% | 34.7% | 31.8% | 56.9% | 60.7% |
| ROCE | -2.0% | -2.0% | -62.4% | 40.6% | 43.0% | 83.0% | 86.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.38 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.72 | 6.72 | — | 0.15 | 0.54 | 0.32 | 0.39 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.06 | -0.08 | -0.10 | -0.05 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.31 | 3.31 | — | -0.35 | -0.12 | 0.21 | 0.16 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -1.38 | -0.23 | 1.04 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -44.16 | -44.16 | -139.06 | 29.30 | 43.73 | 55.78 | 93.69 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.64 | 2.21 | 1.61 | 1.50 | 1.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.61 | 1.80 | 1.28 | 1.06 | 0.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.37 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.75 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.80 | 5.80 | 39.42 | 3.97 | 3.21 | 2.64 | 1.37 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 205.51 | 186.07 | 157.38 | 143.04 | 659.21 | 215.08 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 16.5% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $34198 | $29425 | $25000 | $25000 | $25000 | $25000 |
Liquidity and operational burn
As reported in financial statements, Mingteng's gross margin has deteriorated from a peak of 52.1% in 2022Q4 to 18.1% in 2025Q4, indicating that the company is struggling to maintain pricing power amidst the intense competitive environment of the Chinese automotive supply chain.
The collapse in operating margins to -4.8% suggests that the company's fixed-cost structure is currently misaligned with its revenue generation capacity. Investors should monitor whether the shift toward EV-related molds can eventually provide the necessary premium to offset these persistent operational losses.
Based on recent SEC filings, Mingteng's ROIC has plummeted from 17.2% in 2022Q4 to -1.5% in 2025Q4, signaling a significant decay in the company's ability to generate returns on its invested capital as it attempts to scale its manufacturing footprint.
This negative trend in return on capital suggests that recent investments in production capacity have failed to yield commensurate earnings growth. The decline appears structural rather than temporary, as the company continues to struggle with the high capital intensity required for precision mold fabrication.
According to the company's reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, reaching 72 days in 2025Q4, which highlights the inherent difficulty in managing liquidity within a project-based manufacturing model that is highly sensitive to automotive OEM payment cycles.
The erratic nature of DSO and DIO suggests that Mingteng lacks leverage over its customers, often resulting in delayed cash inflows that exacerbate the firm's operational burn. This inefficiency in working capital management warrants further investigation into the company's credit terms with its primary Tier 1 automotive partners.
As reported in financial statements, the company's current ratio has tightened to 1.19 in 2025Q4, leaving a narrow margin of safety to cover short-term obligations given the ongoing negative net income and the company's limited cash reserves of approximately $1.5M.
The reliance on current assets to fund operations in a period of negative cash flow suggests that the balance sheet is increasingly vulnerable to any further delays in project milestones. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional financing or reach break-even before existing liquidity is exhausted.
The market's reliance on P/S multiples to value Mingteng is fundamentally flawed, as it ignores the company's inability to convert revenue into positive net income, thereby obscuring the severe operational losses that currently define the firm's financial profile.
Instead of P/S, analysts should focus on the cash burn rate relative to the remaining cash runway, as this provides a more accurate assessment of the company's survival risk. Using revenue-based multiples in a loss-making, capital-intensive industrial context risks overstating the company's intrinsic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MTEN stock.
Mingteng International Corporation Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Mingteng International Corporation Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 3.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.7x.
Mingteng International Corporation Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -11.7%. The historical average is 27.7%.
Based on historical data, Mingteng International Corporation Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Mingteng International Corporation Inc. has 22.5% gross margin and -2.6% operating margin.
Mingteng International Corporation Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.