Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 3.3x · EV/EBITDA 6.8x · ROE 157.3%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24M | $15M | $4M | $8M | $5M | $40M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $19M | $10M | $3M | $6M | $5M | $22M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 3.28 | 2.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.11 | 1.36 | 0.45 | 1.15 | 0.47 | 2.63 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.99 | 2.02 | 3.19 | 3.81 | 2.55 | 1.04 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 5.87 | 3.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 5.85 | 3.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.92 | 0.36 | 0.94 | 0.47 | 1.45 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.82 | 3.75 | 3.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.49 | 6.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 2.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 81.1% | 81.1% | 62.9% | 47.6% | 52.0% | 50.1% | 65.4% | 58.7% | 62.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 14.5% | -20.1% | -236.9% | -339.3% | -229.0% | 0.0% | -43.7% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 61.3% | 61.3% | -31.7% | -207.3% | -348.6% | -220.0% | -9.2% | -30.1% | -13.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 157.3% | 157.3% | -166.1% | -717.4% | -180.5% | -167.5% | -67.2% | -54.9% | -21.5% |
| ROA | 76.0% | 76.0% | -34.4% | -100.0% | -103.4% | -97.4% | -11.6% | -25.1% | -12.8% |
| ROIC | 81.5% | 81.5% | -255.5% | -968.7% | -236.6% | -180.1% | 0.0% | -38.6% | -5.0% |
| ROCE | 33.3% | 33.3% | -102.5% | -422.9% | -148.6% | -156.7% | 0.0% | -79.8% | -7.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 6.72 | 2.23 | 0.48 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | — | — | — | 15.05 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.66 | -0.66 | -0.71 | 0.01 | -0.47 | 4.25 | 1.68 | 0.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.80 | -1.80 | -0.97 | — | — | — | 9.51 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.23 | — | — | — | — | 1.75 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 87.32 | 87.32 | -24.24 | -17.53 | -31.09 | -65.85 | 0.05 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($5M) exceeds total debt ($17575)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.25 | 2.25 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 2.70 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 1.38 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.25 | 2.25 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 2.70 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 1.38 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 1.95 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.54 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.94 | 1.39 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.30 | 1.10 | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.48 | 60.79 | 38.87 | 71.26 | 136.26 | 114.52 | 156.84 | 128.71 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 30.5% | 45.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 17.1% | 26.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $3M | $3M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $2M | $2M |
License Portfolio Expiration Risk
Based on reported figures, MSGM trades at a P/E of 2.68 and an EV/EBITDA of 5.24, which suggests the market is pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented gaming entity, likely reflecting deep skepticism regarding the sustainability of its current earnings profile.
The low valuation multiples appear to be a direct consequence of the company's volatile earnings history and the high risk associated with its licensing-dependent business model. Investors should monitor whether these multiples represent a value opportunity or a value trap, as the lack of forward-looking guidance suggests that the market is struggling to assign a terminal value to the firm's intellectual property.
According to financial statements, MSGM's ROIC has fluctuated wildly between -71.2% and 124.4% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company is failing to consistently compound capital and is instead experiencing significant volatility driven by non-recurring events and shifting operational performance.
The extreme swings in return on invested capital suggest that management has struggled to deploy capital effectively across its gaming and esports segments. This inconsistency warrants further investigation into whether the company's core assets are capable of generating sustainable returns or if the business model is fundamentally hampered by its high fixed-cost structure.
As reported in recent filings, MSGM's asset turnover remains low at 0.31 in 2026Q1, while the company's DPO has shown extreme volatility, reaching as high as 551 days in 2025Q1, which suggests significant challenges in managing supplier relationships and optimizing the cash conversion cycle.
The inability to maintain a stable working capital cycle appears to be a structural weakness that forces the company to rely on external financing or equity dilution. Investors should be wary of these efficiency metrics, as they indicate that the company's operational leverage is not being utilized to drive meaningful cash flow generation.
Based on an analysis of the business model, the P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for MSGM, as it fails to account for the non-recurring accounting gains that frequently distort the company's net income and mask the underlying cash-burning nature of its operations.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/Sales or cash-based metrics to better understand the company's true valuation, as the P/E ratio is heavily influenced by one-time items that do not reflect repeatable earning power. Relying on traditional earnings multiples in this context may lead to a significant misinterpretation of the company's actual financial health and long-term viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MSGM stock.
Motorsport Games Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 3.3x. The historical average is 2.2x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Motorsport Games Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 3.7x.
Motorsport Games Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 157.3%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -71.5%.
Based on historical data, Motorsport Games Inc. is trading at a P/E of 3.3x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Motorsport Games Inc. has 81.1% gross margin and 14.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Motorsport Games Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.