Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 8.6x · EV/EBITDA 6.6x · ROE 11.0%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23M | $24M | $41M | $40M | $43M | $63M | $52M | $48M | $45M | $54M | $47M |
| Enterprise Value | $16M | $17M | $37M | $38M | $38M | $60M | $46M | $43M | $42M | $49M | $38M |
| P/E Ratio → | 8.62 | 8.85 | 8.61 | 7.84 | 8.08 | 10.72 | 9.59 | 9.64 | 8.77 | 9.55 | 11.18 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.17 | 1.22 | 1.90 | 1.86 | 1.99 | 2.39 | 2.23 | 2.12 | 2.46 | 3.00 | 2.63 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.80 | 2.66 | 2.26 | 2.19 | 2.13 | 2.58 | 2.23 |
| P/FCF | 5.76 | 5.99 | 9.93 | 9.94 | 9.67 | 9.25 | 8.11 | 7.26 | 10.24 | 20.25 | 9.18 |
| P/OCF | 5.72 | 5.95 | 9.91 | 9.79 | 9.40 | 9.14 | 8.03 | 7.20 | 10.13 | 19.73 | 9.06 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.85 | 1.73 | 1.75 | 1.78 | 2.29 | 1.96 | 1.89 | 2.31 | 2.72 | 2.12 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.63 | 7.02 | 8.14 | 7.65 | 6.73 | 8.59 | 8.08 | 8.27 | 7.70 | 10.26 | 7.14 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.49 | 7.93 | 7.44 | 6.81 | 6.75 | 8.70 | 7.80 | 7.75 | 7.50 | 7.90 | 7.12 |
| EV / FCF | — | 4.18 | 9.05 | 9.37 | 8.68 | 8.85 | 7.11 | 6.47 | 9.61 | 18.38 | 7.41 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 51.0% | 50.1% | 50.3% | 53.4% | 52.7% | 52.3% | 55.3% | 66.1% | 61.1% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 10.7% | 20.4% | 22.0% | 25.6% | 25.9% | 23.4% | 22.2% | 29.5% | 25.9% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.4% | 13.4% | 21.6% | 23.9% | 24.5% | 22.6% | 23.0% | 22.3% | 28.3% | 31.1% | 23.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.0% | 11.0% | 19.0% | 21.4% | 22.2% | 25.4% | 23.9% | 23.6% | 24.4% | 26.5% | 19.5% |
| ROA | 8.6% | 8.6% | 14.9% | 16.3% | 16.3% | 18.1% | 17.0% | 17.7% | 19.5% | 20.2% | 14.2% |
| ROIC | 8.6% | 8.6% | 15.3% | 17.1% | 20.5% | 27.2% | 24.5% | 21.6% | 23.4% | 25.0% | 34.7% |
| ROCE | 7.8% | 7.8% | 16.0% | 17.7% | 20.4% | 25.2% | 21.2% | 21.3% | 23.6% | 20.2% | 21.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.06 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.25 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.31 | -0.15 | -0.09 | -0.18 | -0.11 | -0.28 | -0.24 | -0.13 | -0.24 | -0.43 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.05 | -3.05 | -0.79 | -0.47 | -0.77 | -0.39 | -1.13 | -1.00 | -0.50 | -1.05 | -1.71 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.82 | -0.88 | -0.57 | -0.99 | -0.40 | -1.00 | -0.79 | -0.63 | -1.87 | -1.77 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 207.83 | 205.67 | 68.67 | 141.47 | 255.00 | 395.50 | 507.55 | 444.50 | 414.23 |
Net cash position: cash ($8M) exceeds total debt ($929000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.83 | 3.83 | 5.78 | 4.41 | 3.92 | 3.64 | 3.49 | 3.03 | 5.44 | 4.94 | 3.84 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.83 | 3.83 | 5.78 | 4.41 | 3.92 | 3.64 | 3.49 | 3.03 | 5.44 | 4.93 | 3.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.23 | 3.23 | 4.81 | 3.71 | 3.38 | 3.28 | 3.01 | 2.41 | 4.60 | 4.48 | 3.54 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2531.50 | 1536.50 | 1758.25 | 1366.20 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 32.13 | 46.91 | 44.57 | 43.05 | 27.00 | 37.52 | 58.93 | 54.14 | 42.07 | 25.76 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 19.5% | 19.0% | 11.9% | 12.1% | 12.2% | 8.2% | 9.2% | 10.5% | 13.0% | 11.4% | 10.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 172.9% | 172.9% | 105.1% | 93.7% | 98.9% | 87.4% | 88.7% | 99.9% | 113.0% | 110.0% | 123.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 11.6% | 11.3% | 11.6% | 12.8% | 12.4% | 9.3% | 10.4% | 10.4% | 11.4% | 10.5% | 8.9% |
| FCF Yield | 17.4% | 16.7% | 10.1% | 10.1% | 10.3% | 10.8% | 12.3% | 13.8% | 9.8% | 4.9% | 10.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 20.1% | 19.5% | 11.9% | 12.1% | 12.2% | 8.2% | 9.2% | 10.5% | 13.0% | 11.4% | 10.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $21M | $21M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $19M |
Revenue contraction and volatility
According to current market data, MNDO trades at a P/E of 7.85 and a P/S of 1.07, suggesting that investors are pricing in a permanent decline rather than a cyclical recovery, despite the company's significant cash position and high dividend yield of 21.4%.
The low valuation multiples appear to be a direct response to the persistent revenue contraction and the lack of a clear forward growth catalyst. Investors should monitor whether the current P/E ratio represents a value opportunity or a value trap, as the market may be discounting the company's ability to maintain its current dividend payout in the face of shrinking top-line performance.
Based on reported financial figures, ROIC has trended downward from 4.8% in early 2024 to 3.8% in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is struggling to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital as the core billing business faces competitive headwinds.
The compression in ROIC suggests that the company's capital allocation is not currently driving incremental value, likely due to the high fixed-cost nature of its software development relative to the declining revenue base. This trend warrants further investigation into whether management can optimize its R&D spend or if the current asset base is becoming increasingly inefficient.
As reported in recent financial statements, DSO has fluctuated significantly between 35 and 59 days over the last ten quarters, reflecting inconsistent collection cycles that may be tied to the lumpy nature of project-based billing contracts within the mid-market telecom sector.
The volatility in DSO suggests that the company lacks tight control over its receivables, which may be exacerbating the cash flow instability observed in recent periods. Investors should monitor these trends as a proxy for customer health and the company's ability to enforce payment terms during periods of regional economic uncertainty.
As indicated by recent SEC filings, MNDO maintains a negligible debt-to-equity ratio of 0.04, which effectively insulates the company from interest rate volatility and provides a robust buffer against the operational risks associated with its current revenue contraction.
The company's minimal reliance on external financing appears to be a strategic choice that prioritizes balance sheet safety over aggressive growth. While this conservative stance limits financial risk, it also suggests that management may lack the appetite or the necessary leverage to pursue transformative acquisitions to reverse the current growth deceleration.
Financial analysis suggests that the 21.4% dividend yield is the most commonly misapplied metric for MNDO, as it masks the underlying volatility in free cash flow and the potential for future dividend sustainability to be compromised by persistent revenue contraction.
Relying on the dividend yield as a primary indicator of value is misleading because it ignores the fact that the payout may be funded by cash reserves rather than sustainable operating earnings. A more appropriate metric would be the free cash flow payout ratio, which would likely reveal a much tighter margin of safety than the headline yield suggests.
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MNDO stock.
MIND C.T.I. Ltd's current P/E ratio is 8.6x. The historical average is 16.9x. This places it at the 23th percentile of its historical range.
MIND C.T.I. Ltd's current EV/EBITDA is 6.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.7x.
MIND C.T.I. Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is 11.0%. The historical average is 16.3%.
Based on historical data, MIND C.T.I. Ltd is trading at a P/E of 8.6x. This is at the 23th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MIND C.T.I. Ltd's current dividend yield is 19.49% with a payout ratio of 172.9%.
MIND C.T.I. Ltd has 51.0% gross margin and 10.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
MIND C.T.I. Ltd's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.