Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -12.1x · EV/EBITDA 18.2x · ROE -12.2%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $676M | $896M | $458M | $769M | $393M | $602M | $122M | $146M | $199M | $259M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $253M | $473M | $528M | $828M | $496M | $631M | $135M | $154M | $202M | $253M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -12.08 | — | 48.86 | 9.93 | 3.38 | 15.11 | — | 5.87 | 7.98 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 0.69 | 1.11 | 0.69 | 2.12 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 4.24 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.28 | 1.85 | 1.26 | 2.08 | 1.27 | 2.85 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 1.41 | 2.28 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 10.44 | 9.84 | 6.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 343.11 | 455.02 | 4.06 | 4.77 | 2.09 | 11.28 | 9.19 | 3.45 | 5.53 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.88 | 0.79 | 1.19 | 0.88 | 2.23 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 4.14 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.23 | 34.12 | 6.31 | 5.49 | 2.57 | 9.52 | 56.32 | 3.10 | 5.45 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 25.11 | 7.29 | 3.24 | 13.45 | — | 4.92 | 7.57 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 12.06 | 10.60 | 7.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 2.5% | 2.5% | 9.9% | 20.8% | 33.7% | 21.6% | 1.1% | 20.7% | 16.7% | -5.4% | -1.5% |
| Operating Margin | -10.4% | -10.4% | 2.5% | 13.7% | 26.6% | 13.9% | -11.3% | 12.8% | 10.6% | -26.0% | -144.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -9.6% | -9.6% | 1.7% | 11.9% | 20.5% | 14.0% | -2.9% | 10.8% | 11.0% | -25.3% | -144.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -12.2% | -12.2% | 3.1% | 24.3% | 44.6% | 20.9% | -2.9% | 16.0% | 19.7% | -15.6% | -16.6% |
| ROA | -5.7% | -5.7% | 1.7% | 13.0% | 25.1% | 14.3% | -2.2% | 12.0% | 14.9% | -11.5% | -10.8% |
| ROIC | -17.0% | -17.0% | 2.9% | 17.0% | 34.5% | 14.1% | -8.0% | 13.8% | 14.4% | -12.1% | -10.6% |
| ROCE | -7.1% | -7.1% | 3.2% | 20.5% | 42.0% | 16.4% | -9.5% | 16.5% | 17.0% | -13.8% | -12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.07 | — | 0.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 7.35 | 0.27 | 0.26 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.87 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | -0.05 | 0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -30.49 | -30.49 | 0.84 | 0.39 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 5.13 | 0.15 | 0.07 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 1.61 | 0.76 | 1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.17 | -7.17 | 3.44 | 12.76 | 22.41 | 18.37 | -5.86 | 26.23 | 18.22 | -673.95 | -59.61 |
Net cash position: cash ($440M) exceeds total debt ($18M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.46 | 5.46 | 1.37 | 1.12 | 0.91 | 1.86 | 1.46 | 1.68 | 1.17 | 1.31 | 4.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.66 | 4.66 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 1.52 | 1.05 | 1.10 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 4.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.02 | 4.02 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.47 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.50 | 3.94 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.47 | 0.99 | 1.04 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 1.01 | 1.21 | 0.41 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.00 | 6.00 | 13.85 | 14.78 | 8.34 | 14.07 | 13.98 | 11.96 | 13.36 | 6.40 | 3.49 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 36.97 | 40.31 | 50.98 | 26.57 | 57.25 | 43.86 | 30.53 | 17.21 | 42.85 | 64.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 0.5% | 5.4% | 3.4% | 5.1% | — | — | — | — | 2.1% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 219.8% | 31.4% | 17.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 2.0% | 10.1% | 29.6% | 6.6% | — | 17.0% | 12.5% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 9.6% | 10.2% | 16.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.7% | 0.5% | 5.4% | 3.4% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.1% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $45M | $45M | $45M | $44M | $42M | $41M | $40M | $38M | $39M |
Unsustainable negative operating margins
Based on recent financial data, METC's EV/EBITDA of 18.70 suggests a valuation premium that appears disconnected from its current negative operating margins, potentially reflecting investor anticipation of non-coal asset monetization rather than traditional metallurgical coal production performance relative to peers like Alpha Metallurgical Resources.
The current valuation multiples imply that the market is pricing in significant optionality, likely related to specialty mineral rights or future strategic pivots, rather than the immediate cash-generating capacity of the core mining business. Investors should monitor whether this premium holds if the company fails to demonstrate a clear path back to positive EBITDA generation.
As reported in quarterly filings, METC's gross margin has deteriorated to -3.3% in 2026Q1, a stark reversal from the 24.0% achieved in 2023Q4, indicating that the company's current cost structure is failing to cover the direct expenses of metallurgical coal production in the current pricing environment.
The shift to negative operating margins of -20.0% highlights a structural inability to absorb corporate overhead and depreciation, suggesting that the company's cost-per-ton is currently uncompetitive. This trend warrants further investigation into whether geological challenges at primary sites are permanently impairing the company's ability to achieve historical profitability levels.
According to recent financial statements, METC's ROIC has plummeted to -18.8% in 2026Q1, reflecting a rapid decay in capital efficiency as the company continues to invest in mining infrastructure despite a 19.46% year-over-year revenue contraction and persistent negative net margins.
The decline in ROIC from positive territory in 2024 to deep negative levels suggests that recent capital expenditures are not yielding adequate returns, potentially due to the high fixed-cost nature of underground mining. This trend indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value with every dollar of capital deployed into its core operations.
Data from recent SEC filings reveals that METC's cash conversion cycle has extended to 78 days in 2026Q1, up from 32 days in 2023Q4, signaling mounting inefficiencies in inventory management and receivables collection during this period of significant market volatility and revenue contraction.
The lengthening of the cash conversion cycle suggests that the company is struggling to convert its produced coal into cash, which exacerbates the strain on its liquidity. Investors should monitor whether this inefficiency is a temporary byproduct of logistical bottlenecks or a more permanent shift in the company's ability to manage its working capital cycle.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for METC, as it obscures the company's true earning power by failing to account for the significant non-cash depreciation charges and the potential value of non-coal mineral assets that are not yet contributing to the bottom line.
Given the company's current negative net income and heavy capital intensity, the P/E ratio provides a distorted view of the firm's health. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or cash-based metrics to better understand the underlying operational performance and the value of the company's land-based optionality.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying METC stock.
Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -12.1x. The historical average is 15.2x.
Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 18.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.4x.
Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -12.2%. The historical average is -0.1%.
Based on historical data, Ramaco Resources, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -12.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.70%.
Ramaco Resources, Inc. has 2.5% gross margin and -10.4% operating margin.
Ramaco Resources, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.