Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.9x · EV/EBITDA 225.9x · ROE N/A. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $339M | $353M | $306M | $295M | $640M | $781M | $389M | $753M | $794M | $871M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.6B | $3.6B | $3.4B | $3.4B | $3.7B | $3.8B | $3.8B | $5.1B | $5.2B | $5.3B | $6.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.23 | 4.41 | 7.30 | 42.15 | 4.16 | 4.91 | 1.38 | 2.68 | 4.99 | 2.15 | 4.92 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.61 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.44 |
| P/FCF | 8.91 | 9.29 | — | — | — | 1.53 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 8.91 | 9.29 | — | — | — | 1.53 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 45.36 | 81.99 | 478.72 | 23.88 | 24.11 | 13.42 | 18.21 | 32.89 | 13.03 | 22.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 225.92 | 226.80 | — | — | 114.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | 226.80 | — | — | 114.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 95.50 | — | — | — | 7.52 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | 15.0% | -347.6% | -2500.0% | 70.1% | -123.9% | -91.5% | 10.0% | 47.8% | -74.3% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | -226.3% | -226.3% | -1050.0% | -6914.3% | -96.1% | -279.9% | -205.0% | -127.0% | -186.2% | -163.2% | -117.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -221.3% | -221.3% | -1057.1% | -6957.1% | -131.8% | -279.9% | -205.0% | -127.8% | -186.2% | -396.3% | -117.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | -117.0% | -36.4% | -23.2% | -68.8% | -9.7% |
| ROA | -8.5% | -8.5% | -18.6% | -16.3% | -5.0% | -8.5% | -8.9% | -4.7% | -3.4% | -15.9% | -2.6% |
| ROIC | -12.9% | -12.9% | -26.8% | -20.3% | -4.5% | -10.6% | -9.9% | -5.0% | -3.9% | -7.1% | -2.6% |
| ROCE | -12.4% | -12.4% | -18.5% | -19.0% | -3.9% | -8.5% | -8.9% | -4.7% | -3.5% | -6.9% | -2.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.91 | 5.30 | 4.17 | 3.19 | 1.58 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 209.19 | 209.19 | — | — | 96.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.79 | 5.20 | 3.92 | 3.09 | 1.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 204.75 | 204.75 | — | — | 94.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 86.21 | — | — | — | 5.98 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.08 | 0.08 | -1.11 | -1.29 | 0.18 | -1.46 | -1.54 | -0.26 | -0.01 | -1.43 | -0.53 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.69 | 2.69 | — | 0.94 | 5.82 | 1388.33 | 383.25 | 87.82 | 43.09 | 2.74 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.69 | 2.69 | — | 5.30 | 7.47 | 2057.67 | 383.25 | 128.63 | 60.57 | 29.29 | 11.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.43 | 2.43 | — | 0.23 | 5.14 | 897.00 | 225.50 | 55.43 | 29.61 | 18.76 | 7.81 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 100.0% | — | 7.7% | — | — | 14.1% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 11.2% | 10.8% | — | — | — | 65.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.1% | 2.0% | 1.3% | 12.9% | 0.5% | 0.1% | 51.5% | 14.1% | 5.5% | 37.9% | 7.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.1% | 2.0% | 1.3% | 100.0% | 0.5% | 7.8% | 51.5% | 14.1% | 19.6% | 37.9% | 7.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $49M | $47M | $48M | $50M | $49M | $59M | $81M | $89M | $119M | $133M |
Negative equity insolvency risk
As reported in financial statements, MBI's P/B ratio is effectively non-meaningful due to a negative equity position of $2.3 billion as of 2026Q1, which suggests that traditional valuation multiples are insufficient to capture the liquidation-oriented nature of the company's remaining run-off insurance book.
The absence of a positive book value renders standard P/B analysis inapplicable, forcing investors to rely on Adjusted Net Worth or liquidation estimates. This valuation profile implies that the market is pricing the equity as a speculative call option on the potential for future capital releases from the National subsidiary rather than as a going concern.
Based on reported figures, the combined ratio has exhibited extreme volatility, ranging from 2.4% in 2024Q4 to 146.7% in 2025Q3, which indicates that the company's underwriting performance is heavily influenced by lumpy loss reserve adjustments rather than consistent, predictable insurance operations.
The wide swings in the combined ratio suggest that the company's underwriting profitability is largely a function of legacy credit events rather than current business production. This instability makes it difficult to forecast future underwriting margins, as the expense ratio remains burdened by the fixed costs of managing a shrinking portfolio.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's negative equity position severely restricts its ability to maintain traditional underwriting leverage, as the capital base is insufficient to support new business, effectively forcing the firm into a permanent state of portfolio run-off and capital preservation.
The lack of positive surplus capital means that the premium-to-surplus ratio is not a meaningful metric for assessing growth capacity, but rather a signal of structural insolvency risk. Investors should monitor whether the company can successfully upstream dividends from its National subsidiary to address the parent company's capital deficit.
As noted in financial analysis, the most commonly misapplied metric for MBI is the combined ratio, which often obscures the underlying reality of a run-off entity by failing to account for the non-recurring nature of reserve releases and the impact of legacy litigation settlements.
Using the combined ratio to evaluate MBI's operational health is misleading because it ignores the fact that the company is not actively writing new business to offset the decay of its book. A more appropriate focus would be the net present value of future cash flows from the remaining insured portfolio, adjusted for the probability of credit defaults.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MBI stock.
MBIA Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.9x. The historical average is 14.8x.
MBIA Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 225.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.6x.
Based on historical data, MBIA Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MBIA Inc. has 15.0% gross margin and -226.3% operating margin.
MBIA Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 209.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.