Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 54.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 2.0%. (2024–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $389M | $306M | $362M |
| Enterprise Value | $391M | $307M | $361M |
| P/E Ratio → | 54.15 | 53.15 | 67.07 |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1.28 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| ROA | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| ROIC | -1.7% | -1.7% | — |
| ROCE | -2.2% | -2.2% | -0.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 1.47 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 1.47 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 1.13 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $29M | $36M |
Failed Merger Execution Risk
Based on reported figures, the P/B ratio of 1.08 suggests the market is pricing the entity near its liquidation value, yet the P/E of 54.10 appears fundamentally disconnected from the company's lack of core operating revenue or sustainable earnings power.
The elevated P/E multiple is likely an artifact of non-operating income rather than a reflection of growth prospects, rendering traditional valuation metrics largely irrelevant for this shell entity. Investors should monitor the gap between the current market price and the trust value per share, as this spread serves as the primary indicator of market sentiment regarding the sponsor's ability to execute a value-accretive merger.
According to recent SEC filings, the current ratio has deteriorated significantly from 1.50 in 2024Q3 to a precarious 0.13 by 2026Q1, indicating that the entity's liquid assets are increasingly insufficient to cover its mounting administrative and due diligence obligations.
This sharp decline in liquidity suggests that the company is approaching a critical juncture where it must either secure a business combination or seek additional capital to maintain its listing status. The reliance on restricted trust funds for operational needs may further constrain management's flexibility, potentially forcing a sub-optimal deal to avoid a total depletion of working capital.
As reported in financial statements, the company has transitioned from a debt-free status to carrying $3.6M in total debt as of 2026Q1, marking a departure from its initial equity-only funding model that warrants close scrutiny by prospective shareholders.
While the absolute debt level remains modest, the introduction of leverage into a shell company structure may indicate increased pressure to accelerate the deal-making process to service these new obligations. This shift suggests that the entity's risk profile is rising, as the cost of servicing this debt could further erode the limited cash available for operational due diligence.
Based on the provided financial data, the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is the P/E ratio, which obscures the reality that the company generates no core operating income and relies entirely on non-recurring, non-operating items to report bottom-line profits.
Using earnings-based multiples for a pre-revenue SPAC is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the binary nature of the business, where value is derived from the potential of a future merger rather than current profitability. Analysts should instead focus on the trust account value and the sponsor's historical success rate in closing accretive deals, as these are the true drivers of long-term shareholder value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 2 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MBAV stock.
M3-Brigade Acquisition V Corp. Class A Ordinary shares's current P/E ratio is 54.1x. The historical average is 60.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
M3-Brigade Acquisition V Corp. Class A Ordinary shares's return on equity (ROE) is 2.0%. The historical average is 1.9%.
Based on historical data, M3-Brigade Acquisition V Corp. Class A Ordinary shares is trading at a P/E of 54.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.