Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 2.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE 140.8%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.9B | $8.1B | $5.3B | $5.8B | $3.9B | $14.3B | $15.3B | $9.8B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6.0B | $8.2B | $5.7B | $6.3B | $4.7B | $14.8B | $16.0B | $9.9B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 2.27 | 2.84 | 234.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.93 | 1.28 | 0.92 | 1.31 | 0.95 | 4.46 | 6.49 | 2.71 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.97 | 2.47 | 6.96 | 10.67 | 10.06 | 10.66 | 9.15 | 3.43 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 5.25 | 7.25 | 6.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 5.02 | 6.92 | 6.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.30 | 0.99 | 1.42 | 1.15 | 4.62 | 6.77 | 2.74 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 191.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 105.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.38 | 7.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | 41.5% | 42.3% | 42.2% | 40.5% | 46.9% | 38.8% | 39.8% | 42.3% | 37.8% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | -3.0% | -2.1% | -10.8% | -35.6% | -35.4% | -76.5% | -74.7% | -45.3% | -66.8% | -201.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 45.0% | 45.0% | 0.4% | -7.7% | -38.7% | -33.1% | -74.1% | -72.0% | -42.3% | -64.9% | -198.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 140.8% | 140.8% | 3.5% | -73.2% | -183.2% | -70.4% | -77.4% | -111.1% | -44.1% | -42.5% | -73.0% |
| ROA | 39.3% | 39.3% | 0.5% | -7.5% | -34.0% | -22.5% | -33.8% | -55.1% | -26.9% | -32.3% | -54.7% |
| ROIC | -6.1% | -6.1% | -8.1% | -32.5% | -72.3% | -40.4% | -51.0% | -94.6% | -58.4% | -63.8% | -111.5% |
| ROCE | -6.2% | -6.2% | -7.5% | -31.4% | -79.3% | -46.7% | -61.9% | -105.9% | -46.7% | -43.4% | -73.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.39 | 0.39 | 1.53 | 1.92 | 2.73 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.17 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 39.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.04 | 0.54 | 0.89 | 2.01 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.04 | -0.28 | -0.48 | -0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 13.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.13 | 0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.57 | -1.57 | 1.88 | -11.65 | -78.99 | -19.35 | -54.00 | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 1.10 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.22 | 3.68 | 3.51 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 1.10 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.22 | 3.68 | 3.51 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 1.07 | 3.43 | 3.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.70 | 1.06 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.35 | 0.27 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 21.12 | 25.30 | 23.82 | 21.26 | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 44.1% | 35.2% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 19.0% | 13.8% | 14.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 8.5% | 6.2% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.5% | 6.2% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $418M | $414M | $385M | $355M | $335M | $312M | $227M | $284M | $238M | $238M |
Regulatory labor classification risk
Based on current market data, Lyft trades at a P/S ratio of 0.86, which appears to reflect a persistent 'runner-up' discount compared to larger, more diversified industry peers like Uber, suggesting that investors remain skeptical of the company's ability to achieve long-term, sustainable margin expansion.
The forward P/E of 23.90 implies that the market is pricing in a transition toward profitability, yet the lack of a clear PEG ratio highlights the difficulty in forecasting earnings growth given the volatility in insurance and incentive costs. This valuation suggests that the market views Lyft as a commodity-like service provider rather than a high-growth technology platform, warranting caution regarding potential multiple compression if growth continues to decelerate.
According to reported financial statements, Lyft's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, fluctuating between -4.6% and 3.1% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company has yet to consistently generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of capital.
The erratic nature of these returns is largely driven by the company's historical reliance on aggressive incentive spending and the ongoing burden of non-cash stock-based compensation. Investors should monitor whether the recent pivot toward operational efficiency can drive a sustained positive ROIC, or if the business model remains structurally incapable of compounding capital effectively.
As indicated by recent quarterly filings, Lyft's asset turnover remains low at 0.18, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of maintaining insurance reserves and rental fleets, which continues to constrain the company's ability to convert gross bookings into efficient, high-margin operational revenue.
The lack of consistent data for DIO and CCC suggests that the company's working capital cycle is heavily influenced by the timing of insurance-related liabilities rather than standard inventory management. This reliance on liability timing to manage cash flow may obscure the underlying operational efficiency of the core rideshare marketplace.
Based on the most recent quarterly data, Lyft's current ratio has declined to 0.58, a trend that suggests a tightening liquidity position as the company navigates its high-variable-cost structure and the ongoing requirement to maintain significant insurance reserves in a volatile regulatory environment.
This downward trend in liquidity warrants close monitoring, as it indicates that the company has less room for error in managing its short-term obligations. While the company has improved its debt-to-equity profile, the persistent pressure on current assets suggests that any unexpected spike in insurance premiums or a downturn in ride volume could rapidly strain the firm's financial flexibility.
Investors frequently misapply the reported net margin, which reached 173.0% in 2025Q4, as a proxy for operational success, when in reality, such figures are often distorted by one-time tax valuation allowance releases and other non-recurring accounting adjustments that do not reflect the company's true earning power.
Relying on GAAP net income for this business model is fundamentally flawed due to the significant impact of stock-based compensation and volatile insurance reserve adjustments. Analysts should instead focus on adjusted EBITDA or free cash flow margins to better understand the underlying cash-generating capability of the rideshare platform.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LYFT stock.
Lyft, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 2.3x. The historical average is 2.8x.
Lyft, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 140.8%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -53.1%.
Based on historical data, Lyft, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 2.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lyft, Inc. has 41.5% gross margin and -3.0% operating margin.