Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -83.8%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3M | $4M | $6M | $8M | $7M | $158M | $5M | $15M | $7M | $32M | $10362 |
| Enterprise Value | $22M | $23M | $10M | $7M | $4M | $126M | $-5662505 | $18M | $4M | $31M | $3M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | 33.14 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.29 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 1.37 | 1.12 | 11.28 | 4.20 | 6.14 | 2.09 | 7.65 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 2.59 | 0.47 | 5.22 | 1.21 | 35.51 | 0.00 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | 45.33 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.63 | 0.94 | 1.10 | 0.58 | 8.97 | -4.38 | 7.38 | 1.06 | 7.53 | 0.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 7.89 | — | — | 23.58 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 23.59 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -146.1% | -146.1% | 36.4% | 100.0% | 23.1% | 101.5% | 134.2% | 103.6% | 86.2% | 48.0% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | -206.2% | -206.2% | -58.7% | -304.0% | -412.1% | 38.0% | -313.8% | -127.8% | -14.0% | -124.8% | -79.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -306.2% | -306.2% | -66.5% | -257.6% | -455.6% | 33.9% | -312.4% | -124.7% | -14.0% | -207.2% | -51.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -83.8% | -83.8% | -20.8% | -37.2% | -52.3% | 13.1% | -56.5% | -69.5% | -14.1% | -340.6% | -45.4% |
| ROA | -56.5% | -56.5% | -17.9% | -35.1% | -50.7% | 12.8% | -40.5% | -43.9% | -11.8% | -144.0% | -19.4% |
| ROIC | -29.4% | -29.4% | -12.3% | -32.4% | -35.2% | 10.9% | -32.8% | -37.0% | -10.4% | -75.6% | -23.9% |
| ROCE | -47.9% | -47.9% | -16.4% | -41.4% | -45.9% | 14.6% | -42.4% | -47.0% | -13.9% | -99.3% | -31.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 1.34 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 1.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 5.87 | — | — | 0.03 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.67 | 0.12 | -0.05 | -0.07 | -0.53 | -0.97 | 1.05 | -0.60 | -0.57 | 0.69 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 3.29 | — | — | -6.07 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -22.98 | -22.98 | -18.25 | — | -5988.50 | 8161.25 | -564.64 | -29.95 | -1.02 | -8.46 | -6.19 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 2.18 | — | — | — | 27.35 | 2.92 | 22.53 | 1.63 | 8.31 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 2.18 | — | — | — | 27.35 | 2.92 | 22.53 | 1.63 | 8.31 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 2.16 | — | — | 29.77 | 26.44 | 2.20 | 15.23 | 0.58 | 4.59 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0.56 | 2.12 | 0.46 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 3.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $9M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $5M | $270485 | $636719 | $199342 | $67199 | $66000 |
Imminent liquidity and insolvency
Based on reported figures, LMFA trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.04, a valuation level that suggests the market has largely written off the company's ability to generate future economic value from its current hybrid business model of specialty finance and digital asset mining.
The extremely low P/B multiple indicates that investors are pricing the equity as a liquidation play rather than a going concern. This valuation reflects deep skepticism regarding the company's ability to pivot its mining operations toward profitability, as the current market capitalization fails to account for any meaningful growth premium.
As reported in financial statements, LMFA's ROIC has consistently trended into negative territory, reaching -16.1% in 2026Q1, which highlights the company's inability to deploy capital effectively across its bifurcated segments of HOA debt recovery and capital-intensive Bitcoin mining operations.
The persistent decay in return on invested capital suggests that management's strategic shift into digital assets has failed to create a compounding engine for shareholders. Instead, the capital allocation appears to be eroding the firm's asset base, as the returns generated by the mining fleet remain insufficient to cover the cost of the underlying hardware and energy inputs.
According to recent SEC filings, LMFA's asset turnover ratio has remained at a negligible 0.05 as of 2026Q1, indicating that the company's asset base is not being utilized to generate meaningful revenue relative to the scale of its capital investment.
This low turnover ratio suggests that the company's mining infrastructure is either underutilized or fundamentally inefficient compared to industry standards. The lack of operational velocity implies that the firm is struggling to convert its capital-heavy mining assets into a consistent revenue stream, further exacerbating the pressure on its limited liquidity.
Based on the provided financial data, LMFA's debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 1.07 in 2026Q1, a significant increase from 0.18 in 2025Q3, which indicates that the company is increasingly relying on debt to fund operations as its equity base continues to shrink due to persistent net losses.
The rising leverage profile, coupled with negative interest coverage, suggests that the company's debt service capacity is becoming increasingly strained. Investors should monitor whether the firm can sustain this level of indebtedness without resorting to further dilutive equity offerings or asset liquidations to meet its obligations.
Analysts frequently misapply standard Bitcoin mining efficiency metrics to LMFA, which obscures the reality that the company's legacy HOA finance portfolio provides a non-correlated, albeit declining, cash flow stream that is fundamentally different from the commodity-driven economics of pure-play digital asset miners.
Using standard mining valuation multiples ignores the residual value of the Florida HOA lien portfolio, which may act as a hidden source of liquidity. Instead of focusing solely on hash rate efficiency, analysts should prioritize the 'recovery-to-cost' ratio of the legacy finance segment to determine if the company has any remaining intrinsic value beyond its mining operations.
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LMFA stock.
LM Funding America, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. The historical average is 33.1x.
LM Funding America, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -83.8%. The historical average is -58.2%.
Based on historical data, LM Funding America, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
LM Funding America, Inc. has -146.1% gross margin and -206.2% operating margin.