Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -249.0%. (2020–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $171M | $236M | $388M | $925M | $522M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $536M | $556M | $574M | $1.0B | $640M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.91 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.46 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 2.19 | 1.69 | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 2.34 | 3.08 | 1.79 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.69 | 1.35 | 2.39 | 2.07 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 55.6% | 58.9% | 56.3% | 55.0% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -47.6% | -47.6% | -28.7% | -53.4% | -20.3% | -55.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -50.3% | -50.3% | -30.3% | -51.7% | -21.2% | -49.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -249.0% | -249.0% | -55.4% | -73.8% | -24.2% | -44.2% |
| ROA | -25.4% | -25.4% | -18.2% | -30.4% | -10.2% | -19.2% |
| ROIC | -36.7% | -36.7% | -25.0% | -42.7% | -12.2% | -25.8% |
| ROCE | -52.3% | -52.3% | -27.2% | -45.9% | -13.6% | -28.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 1.29 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.62 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 1.12 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -4.46 | -4.46 | -5.49 | -6.94 | -10.85 | -13.33 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.72 | 1.20 | 1.18 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.67 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.33 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.39 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.69 | 1.50 | 1.39 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 45.00 | 39.10 | 42.24 | 47.02 | 36.38 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $117M | $132M | $101M | $54M | $73M |
Liquidity and Solvency Risk
According to recent financial statements, LANV's gross margin has compressed to 53.9% in 2025Q2, while operating margins have plummeted to -55.6%, reflecting a structural inability to cover fixed costs as revenue continues to contract across the group's diverse portfolio of luxury fashion brands.
The persistent decline in operating margins suggests that the company's current revenue base is insufficient to support its global retail footprint and administrative overhead. Investors should monitor whether management can achieve meaningful cost rationalization, as the current profitability profile appears unsustainable without a significant pivot in operational scale.
Based on reported figures, LANV's ROIC has deteriorated to -9.2% as of 2025Q2, indicating that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it, a trend that has worsened consistently since the 2023 fiscal year when returns were closer to -5.3%.
The negative return on invested capital highlights the difficulty of integrating acquired luxury assets while simultaneously managing a declining top-line. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's capital allocation strategy is focused on brand preservation at the expense of necessary commercial returns.
As reported in recent filings, LANV's asset turnover has remained stagnant at 0.11, while the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 85 days in 2025Q2, which suggests ongoing challenges in managing inventory levels relative to the company's current, lower sales velocity.
The high days inventory outstanding, which remains above 200 days, implies that the company is struggling to move seasonal collections efficiently. This inefficiency ties up critical liquidity and may necessitate further discounting, which would continue to pressure gross margins in future periods.
Based on the latest balance sheet data, LANV's current ratio has compressed to 0.35 in 2025Q2, a sharp decline from the 0.95 level observed in 2023Q2, indicating a severe reduction in the company's ability to meet its short-term obligations without external support.
The quick ratio of 0.19 further underscores the company's reliance on inventory liquidation to satisfy immediate liabilities. This liquidity position appears highly vulnerable, and investors should monitor for potential capital calls or debt restructuring requirements to maintain ongoing operations.
Market participants often misapply standard P/S or EV/EBITDA multiples to LANV, failing to account for the company's distressed capital structure and the fact that its current negative earnings render traditional valuation metrics largely irrelevant for assessing its intrinsic value or turnaround potential.
Using standard luxury sector multiples obscures the reality that LANV is currently a special-situations asset rather than a stable compounder. Analysts should instead focus on liquidity-based metrics and the sustainability of parent-company support, as these factors are more material to the company's survival than traditional growth-based valuation models.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LANV stock.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -249.0%. The historical average is -89.3%.
Based on historical data, Lanvin Group Holdings Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lanvin Group Holdings Limited has 55.6% gross margin and -47.6% operating margin.