VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
LAC
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
LACLithium Americas Corp.
$3.62$808M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. LAC
  4. Financial Ratios

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -9.6%. (2007–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

LAC Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2015
Market Cap$808M$1.1B$596M$1.0B$1.6B$2.4B$1.0B$180M$174M$418M$19M
Enterprise Value$406M$660M$25M$835M$1.6B$2.4B$1.0B$216M$151M$363M$17M
P/E Ratio →-7.10——————3.50———
P/S Ratio————————35.8697.41—
P/B Ratio0.560.670.632.67——5.441.132.113.840.31
P/FCF———————————
P/OCF———————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

LAC EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2015
EV / Revenue————————31.1084.71—
EV / EBITDA———————3.56———
EV / EBIT———————3.72———
EV / FCF———————————

LAC Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2015
Gross Margin————————-40.4%-42.3%—
Operating Margin————————-583.7%-589.3%—
Net Profit Margin————————-583.7%-775.1%—

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2015
ROE-9.6%-9.6%-6.4%-2.9%—-63.1%-15.2%42.7%-29.6%-39.2%-18.4%
ROA-6.7%-6.7%-5.7%-2.2%-350.5%-27.9%-8.6%26.0%-26.0%-36.5%-16.3%
ROIC-5.1%-5.1%-7.5%-21.2%-984.4%-40.1%-10.2%35.0%-37.3%-33.4%-13.3%
ROCE-3.1%-3.1%-4.0%-14.9%—-27.4%-8.2%31.5%-26.9%-29.4%-15.6%

LAC Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2015
Debt / Equity0.100.100.020.01——0.650.750.230.010.07
Debt / EBITDA———————1.98———
Net Debt / Equity—-0.25-0.60-0.50——-0.120.23-0.28-0.50-0.02
Net Debt / EBITDA———————0.60———
Debt / FCF———————————
Interest Coverage————-16947.09-18861.81-29575.3219.89———

Net cash position: cash ($568M) exceeds total debt ($166M)

LAC Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2015
Current Ratio5.165.1610.338.370.040.4017.636.2013.9616.441.14
Quick Ratio5.165.1610.338.370.040.4017.426.1213.4815.881.07
Cash Ratio3.213.2110.197.950.010.2116.915.5812.3814.870.89
Asset Turnover————————0.050.04—
Inventory Turnover——————0.28—4.212.93—
Days Sales Outstanding————————146.7486.53—

LAC Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2015
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2015
Earnings Yield———————28.6%———
FCF Yield———————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Shares Outstanding—$244M$201M$160M$134M$134M$134M$92M$89M$76M$27M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeMixed
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Commercial scale execution risk

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Market Pricing Reflects Asset Uncertainty

According to recent market data, LAC trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.58, which suggests that investors are heavily discounting the carrying value of the Thacker Pass project due to the significant technical and execution risks inherent in its unproven clay-based lithium extraction methodology.

The current valuation multiple appears to reflect a deep skepticism regarding the company's ability to convert its massive asset base into profitable production. Investors should monitor whether this discount persists as the company approaches critical construction milestones, as a P/B below 1.0 often signals that the market views the underlying assets as potentially impaired or overly optimistic in their feasibility projections.

Negative Returns Reflect Development Phase

Based on reported figures, LAC's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming out at -6.7% in 2023Q4 and hovering near -0.5% in 2026Q1, which is typical for a pre-revenue developer that is currently consuming capital rather than generating returns on its invested assets.

The persistent negative return on capital highlights the company's status as a capital-intensive project developer rather than an operating business. Until the Thacker Pass facility reaches commercial production, these metrics will continue to reflect the accumulation of non-productive capital expenditures rather than the efficiency of the firm's core business model.

Debt Accumulation Increases Financial Risk

As reported in financial statements, the company's debt-to-equity ratio has risen from 0.01 in 2024Q3 to 0.47 in 2026Q1, indicating a rapid shift toward debt-based financing to fund the massive capital requirements of the Thacker Pass project as equity markets become less receptive to dilution.

While the DOE loan commitment provides a necessary liquidity bridge, the increasing leverage warrants caution, as the company lacks the operating cash flow to service this debt. Investors should monitor the interest coverage profile closely, as the transition from capitalized interest to cash-based debt service could create significant pressure on the balance sheet if production ramp-up is delayed.

High Liquidity Masks Operational Burn

Based on the quarterly balance sheet, the current ratio of 7.36 in 2026Q1 appears robust, yet this figure is misleading as it reflects cash reserves earmarked for construction rather than operational flexibility, leaving the company vulnerable to any unforeseen cost overruns or delays in project completion.

The high current ratio is a function of the company's recent capital raises and loan facilities rather than efficient working capital management. This liquidity position should be viewed as a finite runway; any deviation from the construction timeline will likely necessitate further capital injections, potentially diluting existing shareholders or increasing the debt burden further.

Misapplication of Traditional Mining Multiples

The most commonly misapplied metric for LAC is the EV/EBITDA multiple, which is frequently used by analysts to value the company despite the firm being pre-revenue, thereby obscuring the reality that the company has no EBITDA to measure and no current operational cash flow.

Using EV/EBITDA for a pre-revenue developer like LAC is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the massive, non-cash depreciation and amortization that will eventually hit the income statement once construction is complete. Analysts should instead focus on the Net Present Value (NPV) of the Thacker Pass project and the internal rate of return (IRR) as more accurate proxies for value creation.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

LAC — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LAC stock.

What is Lithium Americas Corp.'s P/E ratio?

Lithium Americas Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -7.1x. The historical average is 18.1x.

What is Lithium Americas Corp.'s ROE?

Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -9.6%. The historical average is -20.0%.

Is LAC stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Lithium Americas Corp. is trading at a P/E of -7.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.