Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -69.2x · EV/EBITDA 0.5x · ROE N/A. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $36M | $32M | $29M | $45M | $94M | $272M | $399M | $311M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $93M | $89M | $139M | $113M | $135M | $281M | $444M | $366M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -69.18 | — | — | — | — | 12.96 | 26.04 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.45 | 0.90 | 1.61 | 3.39 | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | 6.66 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 371.96 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | 125.36 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 0.93 | 1.80 | 3.99 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.48 | 0.46 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.52 | 1.97 | 2.99 | 9.72 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 3.21 | 4.01 | 6.78 | 11.09 | — | 7.35 | 12.13 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 384.84 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -28.9% | -28.9% | 18.5% | 18.8% | 17.9% | 29.4% | 32.3% | 22.5% | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 9.9% | -3.3% | -8.5% | -13.6% | -0.5% | 14.9% | -10.2% | -30.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.5% | 0.5% | -10.5% | -16.5% | -19.3% | 7.0% | 9.1% | -20.5% | -54.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | -209.0% | 106.4% | — | — | — |
| ROA | 1.4% | 1.4% | -26.7% | -31.8% | -27.3% | 13.9% | 23.9% | -53.7% | -111.8% |
| ROIC | 39.6% | 39.6% | -11.7% | -35.3% | -47.8% | -2.6% | 73.4% | -32.1% | — |
| ROCE | — | — | -124.2% | -27.1% | -24.7% | -1.2% | 50.7% | -50.6% | -92.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | 2.50 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 1.20 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.66 | 2.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | 0.23 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.30 | 1.46 | 2.81 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 12.88 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.09 | 0.57 | -1.10 | 2.32 | 2.69 | -1.19 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 2.31 | 2.53 | 10.20 | 8.04 | 1.87 | 2.99 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 2.31 | 2.53 | 10.20 | 8.04 | 1.87 | 2.99 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.51 | 1.31 | 5.74 | 3.79 | 0.29 | 0.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.70 | 2.65 | 2.20 | 1.61 | 1.82 | 1.77 | 1.87 | 2.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | 8.24 | — | 2.42 | 2.42 | 3.67 | 9.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 7.7% | 3.8% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.3% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $3M | $1M | $1M | $318587 |
Asset impairment and liquidity
As reported in recent financial data, KPLT trades at a P/S multiple of 0.11 and an EV/EBITDA of 0.46, suggesting that the market is pricing the company as a distressed turnaround play rather than a growth-oriented fintech entity within the competitive lease-to-own landscape.
The extremely low valuation multiples indicate that investors are heavily discounting the company's future cash flows due to persistent profitability concerns. This pricing suggests the market remains skeptical of the company's ability to achieve sustainable margins, effectively treating the equity as a high-risk option on the durability of its subprime lease portfolio.
Based on the provided quarterly figures, KPLT's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching 10.1% in 2026Q1 after periods of deep negative returns, which highlights the extreme sensitivity of capital compounding to the underlying performance of the lease-to-own asset base.
The volatility in ROIC suggests that the company struggles to maintain a consistent return on its invested capital, largely driven by the cyclical nature of asset impairments. Investors should monitor whether the recent improvement in returns is a structural shift or merely a temporary reprieve from high write-down cycles.
According to historical financial statements, KPLT's asset turnover remains low, hovering around 0.75 in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company requires a substantial and growing asset base to generate each dollar of revenue in its lease-to-own business model.
This low turnover ratio implies that the company is capital-intensive, requiring constant reinvestment to maintain its revenue footprint. The lack of significant improvement in asset velocity suggests that the company has yet to achieve the operational leverage necessary to decouple revenue growth from the rapid consumption of working capital.
As evidenced by the company's unique lease-to-own accounting, the most commonly misapplied metric is traditional revenue, which obscures the true economic reality of the business by failing to account for the high depreciation and impairment costs inherent in the lease portfolio.
Analysts should prioritize cash-based metrics or adjusted EBITDA over headline revenue, as the latter does not reflect the actual cash recovery from lease agreements. Relying on standard revenue figures may lead to an overestimation of the company's earning power, as it ignores the significant capital drag caused by asset depreciation.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying KPLT stock.
Katapult Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -69.2x. The historical average is 19.5x.
Katapult Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 0.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 2.7x.
Based on historical data, Katapult Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -69.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. has -28.9% gross margin and 9.9% operating margin.
Katapult Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.