Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -5.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -55.4%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.6B | $1.2B | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.4B | $998M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -5.43 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 27.18 | 19.92 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 6.72 | 5.80 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 16.69 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 40.5% | 1.3% | -139.6% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -177.8% | -177.8% | -305.8% | -1054.0% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -190.3% | -190.3% | -338.4% | -1104.0% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -55.4% | -55.4% | — | — | -1212.9% | -764.0% |
| ROA | -66.6% | -66.6% | -222.5% | -243.5% | -177.6% | -374.3% |
| ROIC | -658.2% | -658.2% | — | — | -8985.7% | — |
| ROCE | -78.6% | -78.6% | -1142.2% | -622.7% | -235.6% | -760.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.22 | 0.22 | — | — | 12.94 | 0.12 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.94 | — | — | -0.85 | -1.38 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -13.70 | -13.70 | -14.10 | -13.96 | -28.04 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($238M) exceeds total debt ($44M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.72 | 6.72 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 3.96 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 6.55 | 6.55 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 3.96 | 1.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.26 | 6.26 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 3.68 | 1.43 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.20 | 0.61 | 0.20 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.42 | 5.42 | 8.34 | 8.65 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 49.31 | 26.22 | 101.08 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $50M | $50M | $50M | $50M |
Unsustainable Operating Cash Burn
Based on current market data, KMTS trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 25.78, which significantly exceeds the valuation of established med-tech peers like Medtronic and Abbott, suggesting that investors are pricing in aggressive future market share capture rather than current earnings or cash flow generation.
The elevated P/S ratio implies that the market is valuing the company as a high-growth disruptor rather than a traditional medical device manufacturer. This valuation appears to hinge on the assumption that the ASSURE platform will achieve widespread clinical adoption and eventually command margins comparable to industry leaders.
According to recent financial statements, KMTS reported an ROIC of -27.3% in 2026Q3, a figure that underscores the substantial capital intensity required to deploy the ASSURE system and the current inability of the business model to generate positive returns on invested capital during this expansion phase.
The negative ROIC trend suggests that the company is currently in a value-destructive phase of its lifecycle, where the cost of capital deployment far outweighs the immediate returns from the installed base. Investors should monitor whether this metric improves as the company achieves greater scale and manufacturing efficiencies.
As reported in quarterly filings, the company's DSO of 189 days in 2026Q3 indicates significant friction in the reimbursement cycle, which is notably higher than the typical med-tech industry standard and suggests potential challenges in converting billings into realized cash from third-party payers.
The extended collection period highlights the complexity of the reimbursement environment for wearable cardiac devices, where administrative hurdles often delay cash inflows. This inefficiency in working capital management may continue to pressure the company's liquidity until billing processes are fully optimized.
Based on the 2026Q3 balance sheet, KMTS maintains a current ratio of 7.32, providing a substantial liquidity cushion that appears sufficient to support the company's ongoing high cash burn rate while it continues to scale its commercial operations in the competitive cardiac rhythm management market.
This robust liquidity position is primarily the result of recent equity capital raises, which have provided the necessary runway to fund operations despite persistent negative operating margins. While this provides short-term stability, the company's long-term viability remains dependent on achieving operational self-sufficiency before these cash reserves are exhausted.
The P/E ratio is a fundamentally misapplied metric for KMTS, as the company's current negative earnings and heavy R&D investment render traditional valuation multiples obsolete and obscure the underlying value of the company's recurring revenue model and its potential for future data-driven service monetization.
Using P/E to evaluate a company in the early stages of commercializing a disruptive medical device ignores the significant non-cash expenses and growth-related investments that currently depress net income. Analysts should instead focus on metrics like EV/Sales or patient-based growth indicators to better assess the company's true market trajectory.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying KMTS stock.
Kestra Medical Technologies, Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -5.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Kestra Medical Technologies, Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -55.4%. The historical average is -55.4%.
Based on historical data, Kestra Medical Technologies, Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -5.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Kestra Medical Technologies, Ltd.'s current dividend yield is 0.12%.
Kestra Medical Technologies, Ltd. has 40.5% gross margin and -177.8% operating margin.