Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA 20.3x · ROE -173.9%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $108M | $210M | $696M | $1.6B | $840M | $2.6B | $2.6B | $2.4B | $1.5B | $4.3B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.9B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $4.1B | $3.8B | $3.9B | $2.9B | $5.4B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.17 | — | — | 25.86 | 18.21 | 15.33 | 28.18 | 37.76 | 10.45 | 398.08 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.38 | 0.18 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.35 | 1.14 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.13 | 2.23 | 1.12 | 1.91 | 1.16 | 3.08 | 2.57 | 2.93 | 1.97 | 5.43 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 6.57 | — | 28.17 | 9.97 | 11.82 | 14.96 | 21.21 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 6.55 | 4.70 | 27.70 | 14.76 | 7.25 | 7.86 | 6.88 | 16.18 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.66 | 1.42 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.26 | 21.68 | — | 9.63 | 13.39 | 11.65 | 11.85 | 11.96 | 9.64 | 14.30 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 16.87 | 22.69 | 18.06 | 20.02 | 20.23 | 14.22 | 24.19 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 10.99 | — | 44.69 | 14.81 | 19.28 | 28.44 | 26.40 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 16.0% | 16.0% | 18.2% | 19.3% | 17.3% | 19.7% | 21.3% | 20.3% | 21.3% | 22.5% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | -1.3% | -3.3% | 3.3% | 1.3% | 5.2% | 4.5% | 4.4% | 4.0% | 7.0% | 5.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -19.3% | -19.3% | -5.0% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 4.0% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 0.3% | 9.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -173.9% | -173.9% | -25.7% | 7.9% | 5.8% | 18.3% | 10.1% | 8.0% | 18.5% | 2.6% | 244.8% |
| ROA | -26.3% | -26.3% | -6.8% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 4.4% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 4.9% | 0.4% | 15.2% |
| ROIC | -1.9% | -1.9% | -5.1% | 4.8% | 1.9% | 7.0% | 6.2% | 6.4% | 6.5% | 11.6% | 10.0% |
| ROCE | -2.3% | -2.3% | -5.9% | 5.6% | 2.1% | 7.3% | 6.6% | 7.6% | 7.4% | 12.3% | 10.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 15.81 | 15.81 | 2.13 | 1.62 | 2.60 | 2.28 | 1.98 | 2.13 | 1.92 | 1.61 | 38.66 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 20.65 | 20.65 | — | 4.90 | 9.85 | 5.43 | 6.15 | 5.32 | 4.96 | 3.40 | 5.32 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 14.36 | 1.89 | 1.28 | 2.38 | 1.81 | 1.25 | 1.85 | 1.77 | 1.33 | 36.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 18.76 | 18.76 | — | 3.88 | 8.99 | 4.31 | 3.88 | 4.63 | 4.57 | 2.81 | 4.98 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 4.43 | — | 16.52 | 4.85 | 7.46 | 13.47 | 5.20 | 12.43 |
| Interest Coverage | -6.06 | -6.06 | -1.54 | 2.23 | 1.37 | 2.97 | 2.56 | 2.67 | 2.85 | 2.80 | 2.68 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.92 | 2.20 | 2.16 | 1.96 | 2.03 | 1.62 | 1.72 | 1.98 | 0.71 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.18 | 1.49 | 1.40 | 1.26 | 1.44 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.28 | 0.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.21 | 0.45 | 0.85 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.38 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.53 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.30 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 1.27 | 1.42 | 1.31 | 1.46 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.07 | 6.07 | 6.71 | 7.21 | 6.32 | 5.45 | 6.51 | 6.77 | 6.67 | 7.19 | 8.57 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.06 | 37.55 | 43.81 | 42.67 | 48.19 | 41.15 | 39.97 | 40.51 | 44.36 | 41.19 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 113.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 3.9% | 5.5% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 2.6% | 9.6% | 0.3% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 15.2% | — | 3.6% | 10.0% | 8.5% | 6.7% | 4.7% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.7% | 0.1% | 16.0% | 12.5% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 8.3% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.7% | 0.1% | 16.0% | 12.5% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 8.3% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $85M | $85M | $86M | $87M | $98M | $102M | $102M | $106M | $109M | $105M |
Insolvency and leverage risk
According to current market data, JELD trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 20.49, a figure that appears disconnected from its negative net margins and suggests the market is pricing in a recovery scenario that remains unsupported by the company's recent 14.95% year-over-year revenue contraction.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio highlights the company's current inability to generate consistent bottom-line earnings. Investors should monitor whether the EV/EBITDA multiple reflects a genuine turnaround expectation or merely a valuation floor that fails to account for the significant risk of further equity dilution.
Based on reported figures, JELD's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -2.9% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its capital-intensive manufacturing operations and vertical integration strategy in the door skin market.
The persistent negative returns on invested capital suggest that the company's asset base is not generating sufficient operating income to cover its cost of capital. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current manufacturing footprint is structurally oversized for the prevailing demand environment.
As reported in financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has remained stubbornly high at 74 days in 2026Q1, reflecting a lack of improvement in inventory turnover and suggesting that JELD struggles to optimize its working capital despite the ongoing efforts to streamline its operational footprint.
The consistent DIO of over 60 days indicates that inventory management remains a significant drag on liquidity. This inefficiency appears to be a structural hurdle that prevents the company from freeing up cash to address its precarious debt-to-equity position.
According to recent SEC filings, JELD's debt-to-equity ratio has surged to an alarming 112.28, a dramatic escalation that underscores the extreme financial risk posed by the company's reliance on debt amidst a rapidly shrinking equity cushion and persistent negative interest coverage ratios.
The negative interest coverage ratio of -3.10 in 2026Q1 suggests that the company is currently unable to service its debt obligations from operating income alone. This situation warrants immediate monitoring, as it may necessitate further restructuring or capital raises that could significantly impact existing shareholders.
Investors frequently misapply the P/E ratio to JELD, which obscures the company's true financial health by ignoring the massive debt load and the volatility of restructuring charges that render traditional earnings-based valuation models largely irrelevant for this specific industrial turnaround play.
Instead of P/E, analysts should focus on EV/Revenue or liquidation-based metrics to better understand the company's floor value. Relying on earnings multiples in a period of negative margins and extreme leverage may lead to a dangerous underestimation of the company's ongoing solvency risks.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JELD stock.
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.2x. The historical average is 22.6x.
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 20.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.0x.
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -173.9%. The historical average is 10.3%.
Based on historical data, JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. has 16.0% gross margin and -1.3% operating margin.
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 20.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.