Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2026–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | — |
| Enterprise Value | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — |
| P/S Ratio | — |
| P/B Ratio | — |
| P/FCF | — |
| P/OCF | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — |
| EV / EBIT | — |
| EV / FCF | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — |
| Operating Margin | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — |
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| ROE | — |
| ROA | — |
| ROIC | — |
| ROCE | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — |
| Debt / FCF | — |
| Interest Coverage | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Current Ratio | — |
| Quick Ratio | — |
| Cash Ratio | — |
| Asset Turnover | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — |
| Payout Ratio | — |
| Metric | TTM |
|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — |
| FCF Yield | — |
| Buyback Yield | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — |
Small-cap credit sensitivity
According to fund prospectus disclosures, IWM maintains a consistent 0.19% expense ratio, which serves as the primary driver of its stable profitability profile despite the absence of traditional operating margins found in standard corporate entities within the broader U.S. equity market landscape.
The fund's profitability is effectively capped by its management fee, yet it benefits from significant operating leverage as the marginal cost of managing additional assets remains near zero. Investors should monitor whether competitive pressure from lower-cost providers forces a fee reduction, which would directly compress the fund's net margin.
Based on institutional market structure analysis, IWM's liquidity profile is characterized by superior daily dollar volume and narrow bid-ask spreads, which provides a distinct execution advantage over lower-cost peers like VTWO and reinforces its role as the primary price discovery vehicle for small-cap equities.
This liquidity premium is the core justification for the fund's higher expense ratio relative to its peers. The ability to facilitate large institutional trades with minimal slippage suggests that the fund's liquidity is a structural asset that remains resilient even during periods of heightened market volatility.
As reported in comparative industry data, IWM consistently trades at a higher holding cost than competitors like IJR, yet it maintains a dominant market share by prioritizing institutional execution quality over the aggressive fee compression strategies employed by other passive small-cap index fund providers.
The gap between IWM and its peers appears structural rather than temporary, as the fund's ecosystem of market makers and authorized participants creates a feedback loop of liquidity. Investors must weigh the trade-off between the higher expense ratio and the potential cost savings achieved through tighter execution spreads.
As noted in recent market commentary, the P/E ratio is a frequently misapplied metric for IWM because the Russell 2000 index includes a high concentration of non-profitable 'zombie' companies, which renders traditional valuation multiples misleading indicators of the fund's underlying economic health or growth potential.
Relying on aggregate P/E ratios obscures the reality that a significant portion of the index constituents may lack the ability to cover interest expenses. Analysts should instead focus on credit-related metrics and the proportion of profitable versus non-profitable firms within the index to better assess the fund's true risk profile.
Includes 30+ ratios · 0 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IWM stock.
Based on historical data, iShares Russell 2000 ETF is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.