Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -664.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -0.3%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $626M | $464M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $586M | $407M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -664.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.87 | 1.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -0.3% | -0.3% | -13.9% | -10.1% | -12.1% | -29.0% | -17.9% | -4.3% | -4.0% | -6.1% | -6.5% |
| ROA | -0.3% | -0.3% | -12.2% | -8.4% | -8.1% | -20.7% | -15.5% | -4.2% | -4.0% | -6.0% | -6.4% |
| ROIC | -1.1% | -1.1% | -10.1% | -7.0% | -7.5% | -18.3% | -14.4% | -3.7% | -4.0% | -5.3% | -5.7% |
| ROCE | -1.4% | -1.4% | -14.4% | -11.0% | -11.2% | -19.5% | -15.7% | -4.3% | -4.7% | -6.2% | -6.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.83 | 0.45 | 0.27 | 0.00 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.14 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.53 | 0.21 | 0.00 | -0.12 | -0.13 | -0.08 | -0.17 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -4.20 | -4.20 | -31.10 | -15.63 | -10.96 | -21.78 | -36.22 | -180.60 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($63M) exceeds total debt ($6M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.60 | 9.60 | 1.70 | 1.35 | 0.86 | 36.15 | 46.82 | 10.46 | 8.03 | 13.73 | 14.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.60 | 9.60 | 1.70 | 1.35 | 0.86 | 36.15 | 46.82 | 10.46 | 8.03 | 13.73 | 14.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 9.38 | 9.38 | 1.49 | 1.32 | 0.86 | 35.78 | 45.96 | 10.14 | 7.84 | 13.46 | 13.86 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $51M | $47M | $29M | $27M | $25M | $22M | $17M | $13M | $11M | $5M |
Exploration and Permitting Uncertainty
Based on reported financial data, IsoEnergy trades at a price-to-book ratio of 1.83, which suggests that the market assigns a significant premium to the company's mineral assets relative to their historical cost, reflecting high expectations for the Hurricane deposit's future economic viability within the Athabasca Basin.
The lack of meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples underscores that the company is currently valued as a development-stage entity rather than a cash-generating business. Investors appear to be pricing in the potential for successful resource conversion, though this valuation remains highly sensitive to uranium spot price fluctuations and the successful execution of future feasibility studies.
As indicated by the company's financial statements, ROIC has remained consistently negative or near-zero, with a recent figure of -1.2% in 2026Q1, confirming that capital deployed into exploration activities has yet to generate any productive return on invested capital for shareholders.
The volatility in ROE and ROIC, which saw a brief positive spike in 2025Q1, appears to be driven by non-operating accounting adjustments rather than operational efficiency. Until the company transitions to a production-ready state, these metrics will likely continue to reflect the inherent costs of resource definition rather than the compounding of capital.
According to recent quarterly filings, the company maintains a robust current ratio of 17.06 as of 2026Q1, which provides a significant liquidity cushion that effectively insulates the firm from short-term capital market volatility while it continues to fund its intensive exploration and evaluation programs.
This liquidity position is a structural strength that distinguishes the company from smaller, more vulnerable juniors that rely on frequent, dilutive financing. However, the high current ratio also suggests a significant amount of capital is currently sitting in cash or equivalents, which may be subject to inflationary erosion if not deployed efficiently into high-value drilling projects.
Based on reported figures, IsoEnergy maintains a minimal debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 as of 2026Q1, indicating a disciplined approach to capital management that avoids the interest-bearing obligations that often constrain the operational flexibility of peers in the uranium exploration sector.
The company's ability to maintain such low leverage while scaling its exploration footprint suggests a reliance on equity-based funding, which preserves the balance sheet but necessitates careful monitoring of share dilution. This conservative stance appears to be a strategic choice to avoid debt service pressure during the long-dated and uncertain permitting process.
Investors frequently misapply the price-to-book ratio to IsoEnergy, as this metric fails to capture the intrinsic value of unproven mineral resources that are not fully reflected in the historical cost-based carrying value of the company's assets on the balance sheet.
Relying on P/B for a pre-revenue mining company obscures the true value of the Hurricane deposit, which is better assessed through Net Asset Value (NAV) modeling. Analysts should prioritize technical resource reports and discounted cash flow projections over accounting-based book value, which is inherently backward-looking and disconnected from the project's future economic potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ISOU stock.
IsoEnergy Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -664.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
IsoEnergy Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -0.3%. The historical average is -10.4%.
Based on historical data, IsoEnergy Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -664.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.