Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -41.3%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22807 | $8M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-2003447 | $6M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.00 | 0.42 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.47 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.31 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 23.3% | 28.8% | 33.0% | 34.5% | 32.4% |
| Operating Margin | -31.6% | -31.6% | 8.2% | 11.0% | 9.8% | 5.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -29.6% | -29.6% | 10.2% | 10.7% | 8.1% | 0.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -41.3% | -41.3% | 16.7% | 16.1% | 13.1% | 10.4% |
| ROA | -25.2% | -25.2% | 9.3% | 10.0% | 4.5% | 0.3% |
| ROIC | -32.9% | -32.9% | 7.9% | 9.3% | 8.2% | 15.1% |
| ROCE | -44.0% | -44.0% | 13.4% | 16.5% | 15.9% | 99.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 4.46 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 2.83 | 2.09 | 2.37 | 2.08 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.13 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 3.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.32 | 1.75 | 2.29 | 1.84 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 1.39 | 17.45 | 1.95 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -33.63 | -33.63 | 9.26 | 10.32 | 7.50 | 1.49 |
Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($5M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.11 | 2.11 | 1.62 | 1.33 | 1.58 | 0.48 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.97 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.60 | 0.48 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.57 | 2.57 | 2.12 | 1.88 | 1.77 | 1.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 119.26 | 89.00 | 120.14 | 122.24 | 98.61 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4969 | $4531 | $4531 | $4531 | $4531 |
Unsustainable Operating Cash Burn
According to recent financial statements, INLF's operating margin deteriorated to -31.60%, reflecting a fundamental inability to achieve economies of scale as the company struggles to convert its 16.52% revenue growth into sustainable gross profitability within the highly competitive Chinese industrial machinery sector.
The gross margin of 23.33% suggests that INLF operates as a low-barrier metal fabricator rather than a high-tech robotics firm, leaving little room to absorb input cost volatility. This lack of pricing power, combined with high fixed G&A expenses, indicates that the current business model may be structurally unprofitable at its present scale.
As reported in historical filings, INLF's ROIC has shifted from positive territory in 2024Q4 to -9.9% in 2025Q2, signaling that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding returns on its invested capital base during this period of aggressive expansion.
The decline in return metrics suggests that the capital deployed into manufacturing infrastructure is not generating sufficient incremental revenue to justify the investment. Investors should monitor whether this trend represents a temporary investment phase or a permanent impairment of the company's ability to generate economic profit.
Based on the latest quarterly data, INLF's cash conversion cycle has expanded to 91 days, driven by rising DSO and DIO figures, which suggests that the company is facing increasing difficulty in collecting payments from its customer base within the Fujian industrial cluster.
The lengthening of the cash conversion cycle indicates that working capital is becoming a significant drag on liquidity, potentially masking underlying operational inefficiencies. This trend warrants further investigation into the credit quality of the company's customer base and the potential for future bad debt provisions.
As reported in recent balance sheet disclosures, INLF maintains a current ratio of 2.43, yet this figure appears misleading given the company's negative operating cash flow and the rapid depletion of its $6.7M cash reserve relative to its ongoing operational losses.
While the current ratio suggests adequate short-term coverage, the reliance on inventory and receivables—which may be difficult to liquidate in a downturn—renders the liquidity position vulnerable. The company's inability to generate self-sustaining cash flow suggests that it may face significant financing risks if market conditions deteriorate further.
The market frequently misapplies P/S multiples to INLF, erroneously valuing it as a high-growth robotics firm, which obscures the reality that the company functions as a low-margin hardware fabricator with limited intellectual property and significant exposure to cyclical industrial CapEx spending.
Investors should instead focus on the company's ability to achieve positive free cash flow and its gross margin stability, as these metrics better reflect the underlying economic reality of the business. Relying on revenue-based valuation multiples in this context risks ignoring the structural profitability challenges inherent in the company's current operating model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying INLF stock.
INLIF Limited's current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
INLIF Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -41.3%. The historical average is 3.0%.
Based on historical data, INLIF Limited is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
INLIF Limited has 23.3% gross margin and -31.6% operating margin.