Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -23.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -45.1%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.0B | $1.0B | $51M | $52M | $90M | $37M | $273M | $3M | $26M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.8B | $847M | $127M | $88M | $81M | $168M | $365M | $548M | $445M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -23.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | 2.72 | 0.33 | 5.81 | 0.23 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.39 | 4.81 | — | 4.09 | 1.43 | — | 16.46 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | 2.44 | 1.52 | 7.76 | 39.94 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 86.08 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 198.92 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | -47.1% | -47.5% | -133.0% | -123.7% | — | — | 9.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | -161.0% | -75.8% | -190.0% | -247.6% | — | — | -18.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | -183.1% | -80.0% | -289.9% | -721.4% | — | — | -167.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -45.1% | -45.1% | — | -144.9% | -96.1% | — | -820.8% | — | — | -0.0% | -98.4% |
| ROA | -20.2% | -20.2% | -35.6% | -24.4% | -31.1% | -47.2% | -74.3% | -84.4% | 3.4% | -0.0% | -42.3% |
| ROIC | -90.1% | -90.1% | -72.0% | -65.3% | -68.7% | -73.8% | -62.9% | -27.8% | -1.2% | -0.0% | -4.2% |
| ROCE | -22.8% | -22.8% | -27.0% | -21.1% | -30.7% | -52.1% | -42.4% | — | — | -0.0% | -6.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 11.28 | 2.10 | — | 8.89 | — | — | 6.47 | 1.58 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 82.79 | 0.03 | 83.49 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.85 | — | 2.89 | -0.14 | — | 5.50 | — | — | 5.35 | 1.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 81.02 | 0.02 | 82.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -2.70 | -2.70 | -2.06 | -2.00 | -2.33 | -3.67 | -2.18 | -0.56 | 0.79 | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($182M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 23.86 | 23.86 | 9.42 | 9.67 | 12.66 | 1.20 | 5.17 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 23.68 | 23.68 | 9.19 | 9.51 | 12.43 | 0.84 | 4.57 | 0.06 | 0.12 | -10.99 | 0.11 |
| Cash Ratio | 23.60 | 23.60 | 8.63 | 9.04 | 11.80 | 0.39 | 2.60 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | 0.13 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.10 | — | — | 0.33 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 8.95 | 7.66 | 17.41 | 14.76 | 8.52 | 6.89 | 2.46 | 2.35 | 1.20 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | 52.29 | 5.04 | 3.31 | 2.58 | — | — | 4.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $43M | $23M | $21M | $17M | $6M | $3M | $30156 | $264519 | $0 | $11M |
Capital depletion before production
As reported in financial statements, HYMC's P/B ratio of 4.81 suggests a significant valuation premium compared to peers, which appears disconnected from the company's lack of revenue and the speculative nature of its unproven sulfide ore processing project in the Nevada region.
The current valuation reflects investor sentiment regarding the company's massive silver endowment rather than traditional earnings-based multiples, which are rendered irrelevant by the absence of production. Investors should monitor whether this premium can be sustained as the company approaches critical feasibility milestones or if it will compress toward the book value of its physical assets.
Based on the company's reported figures, the ROIC of -112.5% in 2026Q1 highlights the severe capital inefficiency inherent in a pre-revenue mining project that is currently consuming significant resources to fund exploration and metallurgical testing without generating any offsetting operational returns.
The persistent decay in return metrics underscores the challenge of maintaining capital discipline while transitioning to a new processing strategy. This trend suggests that until the company achieves a bankable feasibility study and subsequent production, capital will continue to be destroyed rather than compounded.
As indicated by historical data, the company's inventory days have fluctuated significantly, reaching 187 days in 2026Q1, which reflects the unpredictable nature of managing exploration-related materials in the absence of a steady-state production cycle or consistent operational throughput.
The lack of a stable cash conversion cycle is a direct consequence of the company's development-stage status, where inventory is tied to testing rather than sales. This volatility warrants further investigation into how management plans to optimize supply chain costs once the transition to full-scale milling begins.
According to recent SEC filings, the current ratio of 45.60 provides a superficial appearance of strength, yet this liquidity is primarily composed of cash reserves that are being steadily depleted to fund ongoing administrative and exploration activities without any revenue-generating operations.
While the high current ratio suggests no immediate solvency risk, it masks the underlying reality that the company is burning through its primary liquidity source. Investors should monitor the rate of cash consumption relative to the timeline for completing the sulfide milling infrastructure to assess the risk of future dilution.
The P/B ratio is frequently misapplied to HYMC, as it obscures the fact that the book value of the company's assets is largely tied to historical exploration costs rather than the proven economic value of the underlying mineral resources in the ground.
Using P/B to gauge value in this context is misleading because it fails to account for the metallurgical complexity and the massive capital expenditure required to bring the sulfide ore to market. A more appropriate metric would be an adjusted Net Asset Value (NAV) that incorporates the probability-weighted outcomes of the feasibility studies.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HYMC stock.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's current P/E ratio is -23.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -45.1%. The historical average is -53.8%.
Based on historical data, Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation is trading at a P/E of -23.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.