VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
HYMC
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
HYMCHycroft Mining Holding Corporation
$21.71$2.0B
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. HYMC
  4. Financial Ratios

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -23.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -45.1%. (2012–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

HYMC Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2014
Market Cap$2.0B$1.0B$51M$52M$90M$37M$273M$3M$26M——
Enterprise Value$1.8B$847M$127M$88M$81M$168M$365M$548M$445M——
P/E Ratio →-23.10——————————
P/S Ratio————2.720.335.810.23———
P/B Ratio4.394.81—4.091.43—16.46————
P/FCF———————————
P/OCF———————————

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

HYMC EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2014
EV / Revenue————2.441.527.7639.94———
EV / EBITDA————————86.08——
EV / EBIT————————198.92——
EV / FCF———————————

HYMC Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2014
Gross Margin————-47.1%-47.5%-133.0%-123.7%——9.2%
Operating Margin————-161.0%-75.8%-190.0%-247.6%——-18.3%
Net Profit Margin————-183.1%-80.0%-289.9%-721.4%——-167.2%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2014
ROE-45.1%-45.1%—-144.9%-96.1%—-820.8%——-0.0%-98.4%
ROA-20.2%-20.2%-35.6%-24.4%-31.1%-47.2%-74.3%-84.4%3.4%-0.0%-42.3%
ROIC-90.1%-90.1%-72.0%-65.3%-68.7%-73.8%-62.9%-27.8%-1.2%-0.0%-4.2%
ROCE-22.8%-22.8%-27.0%-21.1%-30.7%-52.1%-42.4%——-0.0%-6.7%

HYMC Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2014
Debt / Equity———11.282.10—8.89——6.471.58
Debt / EBITDA————————82.790.0383.49
Net Debt / Equity—-0.85—2.89-0.14—5.50——5.351.55
Net Debt / EBITDA————————81.020.0282.05
Debt / FCF———————————
Interest Coverage-2.70-2.70-2.06-2.00-2.33-3.67-2.18-0.560.79——

Net cash position: cash ($182M) exceeds total debt ($0)

HYMC Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2014
Current Ratio23.8623.869.429.6712.661.205.170.070.130.150.50
Quick Ratio23.6823.689.199.5112.430.844.570.060.12-10.990.11
Cash Ratio23.6023.608.639.0411.800.392.600.020.070.150.01
Asset Turnover————0.130.780.200.10——0.33
Inventory Turnover——8.957.6617.4114.768.526.892.462.351.20
Days Sales Outstanding————52.295.043.312.58——4.42

HYMC Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2014
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2014
Earnings Yield———————————
FCF Yield———————————
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%——
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%——
Shares Outstanding—$43M$23M$21M$17M$6M$3M$30156$264519$0$11M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeContracting
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetVulnerable
Cash FlowBurning
Top Statement Risk

Capital depletion before production

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q1)

Speculative Premium Overrides Fundamental Metrics

As reported in financial statements, HYMC's P/B ratio of 4.81 suggests a significant valuation premium compared to peers, which appears disconnected from the company's lack of revenue and the speculative nature of its unproven sulfide ore processing project in the Nevada region.

The current valuation reflects investor sentiment regarding the company's massive silver endowment rather than traditional earnings-based multiples, which are rendered irrelevant by the absence of production. Investors should monitor whether this premium can be sustained as the company approaches critical feasibility milestones or if it will compress toward the book value of its physical assets.

Negative Returns Reflect Development Phase

Based on the company's reported figures, the ROIC of -112.5% in 2026Q1 highlights the severe capital inefficiency inherent in a pre-revenue mining project that is currently consuming significant resources to fund exploration and metallurgical testing without generating any offsetting operational returns.

The persistent decay in return metrics underscores the challenge of maintaining capital discipline while transitioning to a new processing strategy. This trend suggests that until the company achieves a bankable feasibility study and subsequent production, capital will continue to be destroyed rather than compounded.

Working Capital Volatility Signals Inefficiency

As indicated by historical data, the company's inventory days have fluctuated significantly, reaching 187 days in 2026Q1, which reflects the unpredictable nature of managing exploration-related materials in the absence of a steady-state production cycle or consistent operational throughput.

The lack of a stable cash conversion cycle is a direct consequence of the company's development-stage status, where inventory is tied to testing rather than sales. This volatility warrants further investigation into how management plans to optimize supply chain costs once the transition to full-scale milling begins.

Liquidity Buffer Masks Operational Burn

According to recent SEC filings, the current ratio of 45.60 provides a superficial appearance of strength, yet this liquidity is primarily composed of cash reserves that are being steadily depleted to fund ongoing administrative and exploration activities without any revenue-generating operations.

While the high current ratio suggests no immediate solvency risk, it masks the underlying reality that the company is burning through its primary liquidity source. Investors should monitor the rate of cash consumption relative to the timeline for completing the sulfide milling infrastructure to assess the risk of future dilution.

Misapplication of Price-to-Book Multiples

The P/B ratio is frequently misapplied to HYMC, as it obscures the fact that the book value of the company's assets is largely tied to historical exploration costs rather than the proven economic value of the underlying mineral resources in the ground.

Using P/B to gauge value in this context is misleading because it fails to account for the metallurgical complexity and the massive capital expenditure required to bring the sulfide ore to market. A more appropriate metric would be an adjusted Net Asset Value (NAV) that incorporates the probability-weighted outcomes of the feasibility studies.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

HYMC — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HYMC stock.

What is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's P/E ratio?

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's current P/E ratio is -23.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's ROE?

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -45.1%. The historical average is -53.8%.

Is HYMC stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation is trading at a P/E of -23.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.