Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.0x · EV/EBITDA 7.5x · ROE 131.9%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $176M | $217M | $121M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $168M | $210M | $122M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.00 | 17.29 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.36 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 8.12 | 10.03 | 35.27 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 18.61 | 22.98 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 17.04 | 21.04 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.56 | 0.36 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.55 | 9.39 | 9.93 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 8.49 | 9.46 | 10.24 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 22.20 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.9% | 27.9% | 24.8% | 26.5% | 62.1% | 62.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 5.3% | 3.0% | 5.5% | 13.4% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.4% | 4.4% | 2.5% | 3.2% | 13.6% | 17.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 131.9% | 131.9% | 334.0% | 704.0% | 66.4% | 145.7% |
| ROA | 28.3% | 28.3% | 107.0% | 164.1% | 12.8% | 17.9% |
| ROIC | 165.8% | 165.8% | 210.0% | 591.0% | 67.4% | — |
| ROCE | 124.0% | 124.0% | 211.7% | 575.8% | 33.9% | 0.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1.05 | 2.11 | 1.33 | 2.48 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 1.39 | 1.69 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.34 | 0.05 | 1.25 | -0.28 | -0.26 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.33 | -0.33 | 0.01 | 0.10 | -0.29 | -0.18 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.77 | — | 3.09 | -0.22 | -0.07 |
| Interest Coverage | 20.58 | 20.58 | 15.22 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($21M) exceeds total debt ($14M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.78 | 1.15 | 1.26 | 1.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.57 | 0.94 | 1.07 | 0.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 1.19 | 0.41 | 0.71 | 0.46 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 3.49 | 38.88 | 45.80 | 0.81 | 1.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | 36.52 | 36.52 | 418.73 | 355.42 | 2.92 | 2.47 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 62.37 | 1.20 | 1.95 | 91.09 | 88.08 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.1% | 5.8% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.4% | 4.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $90M | $15M | $15M | $15M | $15M |
Working capital volatility
According to recent financial data, HTLM trades at a P/E of 13.00 and an EV/EBITDA of 6.98, suggesting that the market is pricing the firm as a mature industrial distributor rather than a high-growth consumer brand, despite its recent double-digit revenue expansion.
The current valuation multiples appear to reflect a significant discount relative to peers like The Lovesac Company, likely due to the market's skepticism regarding the sustainability of HTLM's thin net margins. Investors should monitor whether the current P/S of 0.43 represents a value opportunity or a structural reflection of the company's limited ability to scale profitability alongside its top-line growth.
As reported in financial statements, HTLM's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching 24.3% in 2025Q4 after a period of extreme instability, which indicates that the company's ability to compound capital is currently tied more to working capital management than to consistent operational margin expansion.
The wide variance in ROIC suggests that the firm's capital efficiency is highly sensitive to the timing of project-based deliveries and inventory turnover. Analysts should interpret these returns with caution, as the recent spike in ROIC may be a temporary byproduct of balance sheet normalization rather than a sustainable improvement in the underlying business model.
Based on HTLM's reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has shown extreme volatility, swinging from 1,277 days in 2024Q2 to -4 days in 2025Q4, which highlights a heavy reliance on customer advances to fund operations and manage inventory levels effectively.
The dramatic improvement in the CCC suggests that management has successfully tightened its control over receivables and payables, yet the reliance on negative cycles warrants investigation into potential liquidity risks if customer demand slows. This efficiency gain appears to be the primary lever currently supporting the company's cash position, rather than organic operational improvements.
According to recent SEC filings, HTLM has successfully reduced its debt-to-equity ratio from a peak of 3.88 in 2024Q2 to 0.64 in 2025Q4, indicating a deliberate shift toward a more conservative capital structure that provides a necessary buffer against industry-specific cyclical downturns.
While the reduction in leverage is a positive development for solvency, the company's interest coverage ratio of 14.09 suggests that debt service is currently manageable, provided that operating income remains stable. Investors should monitor whether this conservative stance will persist or if the company will utilize its improved balance sheet to pursue inorganic growth opportunities.
As evidenced by the company's financial data, the market frequently misapplies the debt-to-equity ratio as a proxy for financial health, failing to account for the significant off-balance-sheet commitments inherent in the firm's extensive retail lease portfolio.
Relying solely on the 0.64 D/E ratio obscures the true fixed-cost burden that HTLM carries, which is more accurately reflected in capitalized lease obligations. Analysts should adjust for these operational liabilities to gain a clearer understanding of the company's actual financial leverage and its true sensitivity to retail market downturns.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HTLM stock.
HomesToLife Ltd's current P/E ratio is 14.0x. The historical average is 17.3x.
HomesToLife Ltd's current EV/EBITDA is 7.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.7x.
HomesToLife Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is 131.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 169.5%.
Based on historical data, HomesToLife Ltd is trading at a P/E of 14.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
HomesToLife Ltd has 27.9% gross margin and 5.3% operating margin.
HomesToLife Ltd's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.6x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.