Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.9x · EV/EBITDA 12.9x · ROE 153.6%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.7B | $8.3B | $6.2B | $5.0B | $8.0B | $5.9B | $6.0B | $2.6B | $2.1B | $2.8B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.7B | $10.3B | $7.6B | $6.3B | $9.3B | $6.7B | $6.3B | $2.8B | $2.2B | $2.9B | $1.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.86 | 26.29 | 13.94 | 17.60 | 39.51 | 14.68 | 46.93 | — | — | 45.02 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 6.93 | 5.97 | 6.09 | 5.98 | 12.12 | 13.31 | 22.58 | 13.06 | 13.83 | 8.90 | 8.62 |
| P/B Ratio | 207.05 | 170.83 | 17.01 | 59.18 | 47.12 | 29.97 | 40.00 | 27.89 | 8.44 | 13.52 | — |
| P/FCF | 15.01 | 12.94 | 13.21 | 13.29 | 34.00 | 19.81 | 114.11 | — | — | 21.23 | — |
| P/OCF | 14.85 | 12.80 | 12.92 | 12.76 | 33.32 | 19.71 | 108.95 | — | — | 21.02 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.41 | 7.46 | 7.65 | 14.05 | 15.02 | 23.51 | 14.50 | 14.28 | 9.01 | 9.64 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.92 | 11.44 | 11.98 | 15.01 | 29.23 | 23.88 | 42.64 | — | — | 34.28 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 14.31 | 12.68 | 13.17 | 17.27 | 34.88 | 26.01 | 42.03 | — | — | 35.20 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 16.05 | 16.18 | 16.99 | 39.41 | 22.35 | 118.82 | — | — | 21.49 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 78.1% | 84.3% | 76.8% | 78.9% | 81.6% | 83.8% | 76.8% | 93.3% | 90.2% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | 58.4% | 58.4% | 54.3% | 40.7% | 40.5% | 62.2% | 53.9% | -34.5% | -45.7% | 25.6% | -56.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 22.7% | 22.7% | 43.7% | 34.0% | 30.6% | 90.8% | 48.2% | -36.9% | -52.9% | 19.9% | -70.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 153.6% | 153.6% | 198.4% | 222.1% | 110.2% | 231.4% | 106.3% | -42.4% | -35.1% | 71.6% | -1959.0% |
| ROA | 13.8% | 13.8% | 23.4% | 15.8% | 13.7% | 47.8% | 22.5% | -14.4% | -16.7% | 16.1% | -46.5% |
| ROIC | 32.1% | 32.1% | 25.7% | 17.4% | 16.7% | 30.5% | 27.9% | -14.7% | -18.6% | 33.8% | -74.8% |
| ROCE | 38.2% | 38.2% | 31.1% | 20.3% | 19.8% | 48.2% | 45.2% | -17.5% | -20.4% | 27.2% | -51.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 43.89 | 43.89 | 4.14 | 17.89 | 8.87 | 4.45 | 2.63 | 4.39 | 0.51 | 0.97 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.37 | 2.37 | 2.38 | 3.55 | 4.75 | 3.14 | 2.69 | — | — | 2.43 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 41.15 | 3.82 | 16.48 | 7.49 | 3.85 | 1.65 | 3.08 | 0.28 | 0.16 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.22 | 2.22 | 2.20 | 3.27 | 4.01 | 2.72 | 1.69 | — | — | 0.40 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.12 | 2.97 | 3.70 | 5.41 | 2.54 | 4.71 | — | — | 0.25 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 45.03 | 45.03 | 31.79 | 19.57 | 15.69 | 34.02 | 7.35 | -5.21 | -3.84 | 3.68 | -4.10 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.66 | 4.66 | 7.80 | 6.64 | 5.65 | 7.91 | 1.32 | 6.35 | 2.86 | 3.89 | 4.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.66 | 3.66 | 6.78 | 5.50 | 4.88 | 7.45 | 1.17 | 6.00 | 2.71 | 3.85 | 4.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.81 | 0.81 | 4.29 | 2.99 | 2.77 | 6.32 | 0.87 | 4.92 | 2.37 | 3.57 | 3.76 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.12 | 1.51 | 1.39 | 1.51 | 0.71 | 1.55 | 0.45 | 6.05 | 2.27 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 115.33 | 110.89 | 103.09 | 127.77 | 74.90 | 133.30 | 110.70 | 72.12 | 25.52 | 39.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.1% | 3.8% | 7.2% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 6.8% | 2.1% | — | — | 2.2% | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.7% | 7.7% | 7.6% | 7.5% | 2.9% | 5.0% | 0.9% | — | — | 4.7% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.5% | 4.1% | 4.0% | 8.1% | 2.5% | 5.9% | 2.5% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.5% | 4.1% | 4.0% | 8.1% | 2.5% | 5.9% | 2.5% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $124M | $129M | $134M | $141M | $147M | $141M | $144M | $144M | $139M | $128M |
Royalty concentration and leverage
Based on current market data, HALO trades at a forward P/E of 9.24, which appears to discount the company as a mature royalty vehicle rather than a high-growth biotech, despite the 1.27 PEG ratio suggesting investors are paying a premium for expected future earnings growth.
The divergence between the TTM P/E of 29.28 and the forward multiple suggests the market anticipates significant earnings expansion as milestone payments normalize and royalty streams from established blockbusters scale. This valuation profile implies that investors are increasingly viewing the ENHANZE platform as a defensive, cash-generative asset, warranting a closer look at whether the current multiple adequately compensates for the long-term patent expiration risks.
According to recent financial statements, HALO's ROIC has fluctuated between 4.8% and 10.4% over the last ten quarters, indicating that while the core licensing model is inherently capital-light, the company's returns are periodically diluted by acquisition-related goodwill and non-operating charges.
The disparity between ROE and ROIC suggests that the company's capital structure, specifically its elevated debt levels, significantly amplifies equity returns during profitable periods. Analysts should monitor whether the integration of Antares Pharma assets will sustainably improve these returns or if the increased operational complexity will continue to weigh on the efficiency of invested capital.
As reported in quarterly filings, HALO's cash conversion cycle remains elevated, peaking at 366 days in 2024Q4, which highlights a structural inefficiency in converting royalty and milestone receivables into liquid cash compared to more streamlined, pure-play royalty aggregators.
The high DSO and DIO figures suggest that the company's revenue recognition timing is heavily dependent on partner reporting cycles and milestone achievement, rather than standard commercial sales velocity. This creates a persistent working capital drag that necessitates a larger liquidity buffer than would be required for a business with more predictable, short-cycle cash inflows.
Based on reported figures, HALO's D/E ratio reached 9.76 in 2026Q1, reflecting a highly leveraged position that warrants careful monitoring, especially as the company balances debt service obligations against its aggressive share repurchase programs and ongoing M&A integration requirements.
While the interest coverage ratio remains healthy at 33.50, the absolute level of debt relative to equity suggests that the company's balance sheet is less resilient to potential shocks in royalty revenue. Investors should consider whether the current leverage profile limits the company's ability to pursue future strategic acquisitions or if it necessitates a shift toward debt reduction in the coming fiscal periods.
The most commonly misapplied metric for HALO is the Price-to-Book ratio, which, at 190.27, is fundamentally misleading because it ignores the massive off-balance-sheet value of the ENHANZE intellectual property and the recurring nature of its high-margin royalty streams.
Using P/B to evaluate a company whose primary assets are intangible licensing agreements and regulatory safety databases leads to an erroneous conclusion of extreme overvaluation. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or discounted cash flow models that explicitly account for the duration and probability-weighted value of the underlying royalty contracts.
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HALO stock.
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 31.9x. The historical average is 29.1x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 24.1x.
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 153.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -32.3%.
Based on historical data, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 31.9x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. has 78.1% gross margin and 58.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.4x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.