Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.1x · EV/EBITDA 4.9x · ROE -41.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.9B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $4.1B | $2.9B | $5.6B | $2.6B | $3.6B | $4.9B | $8.2B | $8.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $8.3B | $9.0B | $10.6B | $11.8B | $10.6B | $13.0B | $7.9B | $9.2B | $9.8B | $12.9B | $12.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.10 | — | 37.50 | — | 14.30 | 7.38 | — | — | 7.04 | 23.58 | 6.51 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 0.54 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.56 | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.53 | 1.09 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.96 | 1.69 | 1.74 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 69.49 | 5.46 | 8.29 | 46.46 | 29.51 | 16.16 |
| P/OCF | 2.37 | 3.19 | 3.71 | 3.95 | 5.57 | 5.30 | 2.29 | 3.00 | 5.33 | 7.06 | 5.46 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.92 | 5.30 | 5.37 | 6.97 | 5.25 | 6.58 | 12.11 | 5.73 | 4.97 | 5.85 | 4.94 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.80 | 28.83 | 15.61 | — | 12.45 | 14.40 | — | 17.88 | 7.39 | 10.60 | 7.95 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 160.01 | 16.85 | 21.16 | 93.71 | 46.43 | 24.72 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 18.4% | 19.6% | 17.5% | 18.5% | 21.7% | 16.1% | 21.3% | 22.7% | 24.0% | 27.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 3.6% | 4.9% | 3.5% | 5.1% | 6.2% | -1.7% | 5.6% | 7.8% | 9.2% | 12.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -9.4% | -9.4% | 0.4% | -3.4% | 1.0% | 4.4% | -10.2% | -2.1% | 4.5% | 2.3% | 8.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -41.4% | -41.4% | 1.4% | -13.4% | 3.8% | 18.1% | -32.1% | -6.5% | 14.0% | 7.2% | 28.5% |
| ROA | -8.8% | -8.8% | 0.3% | -3.1% | 0.9% | 4.0% | -7.4% | -1.8% | 4.1% | 2.1% | 7.7% |
| ROIC | 4.3% | 4.3% | 5.4% | 4.1% | 6.2% | 7.7% | -1.7% | 6.1% | 9.2% | 11.4% | 15.6% |
| ROCE | 5.2% | 5.2% | 6.6% | 4.7% | 7.0% | 8.3% | -1.8% | 6.8% | 10.0% | 11.9% | 15.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.13 | 2.13 | 1.79 | 1.79 | 1.63 | 1.62 | 2.11 | 1.44 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 1.16 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.28 | 4.28 | 4.46 | 5.10 | 4.42 | 4.27 | 10.56 | 4.04 | 2.91 | 2.61 | 2.16 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.90 | 1.63 | 1.60 | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.64 | 1.24 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.92 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.80 | 3.80 | 4.05 | 4.57 | 3.81 | 3.72 | 8.19 | 3.48 | 2.51 | 2.13 | 1.71 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 90.52 | 11.40 | 12.86 | 47.26 | 16.92 | 8.56 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.16 | -0.27 | 1.88 | 2.33 | -2.33 | 1.38 | 3.73 | 3.62 | 3.38 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 1.07 | 1.21 | 1.11 | 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 1.21 | 1.19 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.92 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.17 | 4.17 | 4.22 | 4.48 | 3.71 | 3.81 | 4.80 | 4.07 | 4.19 | 4.19 | 4.16 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 46.74 | 47.16 | 49.46 | 45.79 | 49.85 | 50.09 | 47.48 | 47.88 | 48.07 | 42.60 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.4% | 4.1% | 2.8% | 1.3% | 1.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.9% | 31.8% | 6.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 2.7% | — | 7.0% | 13.6% | — | — | 14.2% | 4.2% | 15.4% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 1.4% | 18.3% | 12.1% | 2.2% | 3.4% | 6.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.5% | 4.9% | 6.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 4.1% | 7.3% | 6.2% | 7.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $290M | $288M | $285M | $286M | $264M | $234M | $233M | $239M | $253M | $266M |
High Leverage and Liquidity
Based on current market data, Goodyear trades at a P/S multiple of 0.11x and an EV/EBITDA of 4.96x, suggesting that investors are pricing in significant execution risk regarding the company's ability to restore margins following the recent period of negative net income and structural contraction.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio underscores the market's focus on enterprise-level valuation rather than earnings-based metrics, which is typical for industrial firms undergoing deep restructuring. This valuation level appears to imply that the market is skeptical of the 'Goodyear Forward' plan's ability to drive a sustainable recovery in profitability.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has trended toward negative territory, reaching -1.3% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the capital deployed into the business is currently failing to generate returns that exceed the cost of financing the firm's substantial debt obligations.
The persistent decay in ROIC suggests that the integration of large-scale acquisitions like Cooper Tire has not yet yielded the expected synergies to offset the capital intensity of the manufacturing footprint. Investors should monitor whether the ongoing divestiture program can successfully prune low-return assets to stabilize the return profile.
According to recent quarterly filings, the asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant near 0.21x, reflecting a structural inability to generate sufficient revenue from the existing asset base, which is further complicated by erratic shifts in the cash conversion cycle and inventory management efficiency.
The inability to optimize the cash conversion cycle suggests that the company lacks the leverage to dictate terms to suppliers or customers, leaving it vulnerable to production-related cash traps. This inefficiency appears to be a primary driver of the company's inconsistent free cash flow generation.
Based on the latest balance sheet data, the debt-to-equity ratio has escalated to 2.53x as of 2026Q1, signaling that the company's reliance on external financing has increased significantly while its equity base has been eroded by consecutive periods of net losses and restructuring charges.
The interest coverage ratio of -1.89x in the most recent quarter indicates that the company is currently unable to service its debt obligations from operating income alone. This level of leverage appears to leave the firm with minimal room for operational error, necessitating a successful execution of the planned divestitures.
As indicated by the company's recent financial performance, the P/E ratio is a fundamentally flawed metric for evaluating Goodyear, as it fails to account for the massive non-cash restructuring charges and LIFO inventory accounting effects that frequently distort the reported net income figures.
Investors should instead prioritize EV/EBITDA or cash-flow-based metrics to assess the underlying earning power of the business, as these measures are less susceptible to the accounting noise inherent in the company's current transformation phase. Relying on P/E in this context may lead to a misinterpretation of the firm's true operational health.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GT stock.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company's current P/E ratio is -1.1x. The historical average is 22.1x.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company's current EV/EBITDA is 4.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.8x.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company's return on equity (ROE) is -41.4%. The historical average is 1.5%.
Based on historical data, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is trading at a P/E of -1.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company has 18.4% gross margin and 3.6% operating margin.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.