Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.7x · EV/EBITDA 11.2x · ROE 11.5%. (1995–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $854M | $702M | $702M | $717M | $750M | $810M | $690M | $907M | $656M | $732M | $772M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $917M | $672M | $678M | $859M | $331M | $466M | $1.1B | $851M | $814M | $909M |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.67 | 9.95 | 11.35 | 10.58 | 9.88 | 10.85 | 11.62 | 12.32 | 9.77 | 14.19 | 17.02 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.49 | 2.04 | 1.98 | 2.19 | 2.87 | 3.42 | 2.73 | 3.41 | 2.79 | 3.42 | 3.50 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.41 | 1.10 | 1.17 | 1.25 | 1.41 | 1.31 | 1.10 | 1.50 | 1.23 | 1.55 | 1.80 |
| P/FCF | 12.90 | 10.59 | 17.93 | 9.77 | 16.14 | 10.22 | 18.30 | 12.18 | 7.74 | 13.25 | 11.09 |
| P/OCF | 10.99 | 9.03 | 15.93 | 8.88 | 11.26 | 9.53 | 14.98 | 10.50 | 6.96 | 11.66 | 9.57 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.67 | 1.89 | 2.08 | 3.29 | 1.40 | 1.84 | 4.02 | 3.62 | 3.80 | 4.12 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.17 | 9.57 | 7.96 | 7.17 | 8.27 | 3.14 | 5.47 | 10.51 | 9.11 | 9.91 | 12.07 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.26 | 10.51 | 8.91 | 7.95 | 9.12 | 3.51 | 6.37 | 11.87 | 10.38 | 11.58 | 14.69 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.85 | 17.18 | 9.24 | 18.49 | 4.18 | 12.36 | 14.34 | 10.04 | 14.73 | 13.06 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 66.9% | 66.9% | 61.1% | 69.2% | 87.2% | 93.7% | 77.7% | 77.2% | 80.9% | 82.7% | 85.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 25.4% | 21.3% | 26.1% | 36.1% | 39.8% | 28.9% | 33.9% | 34.9% | 32.8% | 28.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 20.7% | 20.7% | 17.4% | 20.7% | 29.1% | 31.5% | 23.5% | 27.7% | 28.6% | 24.1% | 20.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.5% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 12.3% | 13.2% | 12.0% | 9.6% | 13.0% | 13.4% | 11.4% | 11.0% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.5% | 8.2% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 5.6% | 7.1% | 7.1% | 6.4% | 5.6% |
| ROCE | 8.6% | 8.6% | 6.8% | 10.2% | 12.8% | 12.2% | 9.4% | 13.0% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 9.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.97 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.23 | 4.23 | 1.97 | 1.83 | 2.68 | 2.26 | 3.99 | 3.75 | 4.26 | 3.94 | 5.53 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.34 | -0.05 | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.78 | -0.36 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.17 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.25 | 2.25 | -0.35 | -0.41 | 1.05 | -4.54 | -2.63 | 1.59 | 2.09 | 1.00 | 1.82 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.25 | -0.75 | -0.52 | 2.36 | -6.04 | -5.94 | 2.17 | 2.30 | 1.48 | 1.97 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.82 | 3.44 | 4.55 | 1.80 | 1.65 | 2.17 | 2.52 | 2.80 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 26.4% | 26.4% | 30.3% | 28.4% | 25.3% | 25.2% | 56.4% | 39.5% | 23.6% | 25.0% | 27.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.9% | 10.1% | 8.8% | 9.5% | 10.1% | 9.2% | 8.6% | 8.1% | 10.2% | 7.0% | 5.9% |
| FCF Yield | 7.8% | 9.4% | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.2% | 9.8% | 5.5% | 8.2% | 12.9% | 7.6% | 9.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.2% | 6.3% | 2.2% | 3.3% | 8.2% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.3% | 9.0% | 4.8% | 5.9% | 10.8% | 7.1% | 8.1% | 3.3% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $11M | $12M | $12M | $13M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M |
Urban CRE concentration risk
Based on recent market data, GSBC trades at a P/B of 1.42, which suggests that investors are currently pricing the bank as a commodity balance sheet rather than a premium franchise, despite its historical deposit dominance in the Springfield MSA.
The current P/B multiple appears to discount the bank's specialized LPO-driven growth strategy in favor of its slower-growth regional utility characteristics. This valuation implies that the market remains skeptical of the bank's ability to generate superior returns on tangible equity given the persistent margin compression observed in recent quarters.
According to quarterly financial disclosures, GSBC's ROE has remained muted at 2.8% in 2026Q1, reflecting a structural inability to leverage its asset base effectively while net interest margins remain compressed at 0.8% across the observed ten-quarter period.
The decomposition of profitability indicates that the bank's reliance on interest-based income is currently failing to drive meaningful ROE expansion. Investors should monitor whether the bank's high fixed-cost retail branch network continues to drag on operating leverage, as the current efficiency ratio of 48.9% suggests rising overhead relative to revenue.
As reported in financial statements, the bank's efficiency ratio has deteriorated to 48.9% in 2026Q1 from a 37.1% low in 2024Q3, indicating that operating expenses are consuming a larger portion of revenue as the net interest margin remains stagnant at 0.8%.
The lack of expansion in the net interest margin suggests that the bank's funding costs are likely tracking closely with asset yields, limiting the benefit of its low-cost deposit base. This trend may indicate that the bank is struggling to maintain operating leverage in a high-rate environment, necessitating a closer look at cost-control initiatives.
Based on reported figures, GSBC maintains a stable equity-to-assets ratio of 0.11 as of 2026Q1, which, when combined with a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.64, provides a significant capital buffer against potential credit volatility in its urban commercial real estate portfolio.
This conservative capitalization appears to be a deliberate management strategy to mitigate risks associated with the bank's geographic expansion into volatile urban markets. While this fortress-like position limits potential ROE upside, it provides the necessary resilience to navigate potential downturns in the CRE sector without immediate capital constraints.
Investors should be wary of relying on the P/E ratio of 12.77, as it is frequently distorted by the bank's inconsistent provisioning for loan losses, which ranged from a $1.6 million expense to a zero-provision stance over the last two years.
The P/E ratio fails to account for the underlying credit risk inherent in the bank's construction and CRE-heavy loan book, which is subject to CECL-driven volatility. A more accurate assessment of the bank's earnings power would require adjusting for these non-cash provision swings to reveal the core operating performance.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GSBC stock.
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 12.7x. The historical average is 14.4x. This places it at the 55th percentile of its historical range.
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.2x.
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 11.5%. The historical average is 14.6%.
Based on historical data, Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 12.7x. This is at the 55th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.09% with a payout ratio of 26.4%.
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. has 66.9% gross margin and 25.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.