Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.0x · EV/EBITDA 3.6x · ROE 22.1%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $505M | $382M | $493M | $490M | $925M | $704M | $788M | $1.4B | $900M | $600M | $258M |
| Enterprise Value | $984M | $861M | $756M | $890M | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.2B | $892M | $543M |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.02 | 7.72 | 5.12 | 4.42 | 4.12 | 11.57 | — | 23.92 | 12.40 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.02 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.88 | 1.02 | 2.00 | 2.20 | 1.50 | 1.82 | 1.34 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.02 | 1.55 | 2.42 | 2.78 | 8.00 | — | — | 10.42 | 6.29 | 4.74 | 1.82 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 1.76 | 4.81 | 3.10 | 8.04 | 8.44 | 12.69 | 6.84 | 16.43 | 5.92 |
| P/OCF | 34.33 | 25.97 | 1.05 | 1.63 | 1.98 | 3.25 | 4.67 | 5.88 | 3.51 | 4.22 | 3.11 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.75 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 1.26 | 1.89 | 3.54 | 2.74 | 2.03 | 2.70 | 2.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.62 | 3.16 | 1.80 | 2.05 | 2.13 | 4.72 | 188.00 | 5.45 | 3.49 | 5.80 | 11.52 |
| EV / EBIT | 6.35 | 8.38 | 2.72 | 3.54 | 3.03 | 7.28 | — | 8.46 | 5.02 | 15.50 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 2.70 | 8.74 | 4.44 | 14.83 | 14.92 | 15.80 | 9.27 | 24.40 | 12.47 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 47.6% | 55.4% | 53.3% | 56.5% | 56.2% | 38.2% | 56.4% | 55.7% | 47.3% | 25.8% |
| Operating Margin | 31.5% | 31.5% | 43.6% | 41.5% | 50.0% | 27.0% | -28.1% | 33.5% | 42.7% | 23.9% | -14.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.1% | 10.1% | 14.6% | 14.7% | 21.4% | 8.9% | -59.2% | 9.2% | 12.0% | -7.3% | -25.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 22.1% | 22.1% | 50.8% | 76.2% | 836.8% | — | -1966.2% | 41.9% | 53.7% | -18.1% | -28.7% |
| ROA | 4.4% | 4.4% | 8.7% | 11.2% | 24.0% | 6.6% | -25.7% | 6.7% | 8.8% | -3.4% | -7.3% |
| ROIC | 19.5% | 19.5% | 41.5% | 43.1% | 75.1% | 27.1% | -17.1% | 33.8% | 43.7% | 14.0% | -4.7% |
| ROCE | 17.9% | 17.9% | 35.7% | 41.0% | 73.1% | 25.5% | -15.8% | 32.9% | 40.6% | 13.6% | -4.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.66 | 3.03 | 4.58 | — | — | 3.39 | 3.12 | 3.36 | 2.53 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.13 | 2.13 | 1.29 | 1.23 | 0.85 | 2.53 | 108.90 | 1.43 | 1.28 | 2.77 | 7.61 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.95 | 1.30 | 2.27 | 3.47 | — | — | 2.55 | 2.23 | 2.30 | 2.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.76 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 2.16 | 81.65 | 1.07 | 0.92 | 1.89 | 6.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 0.94 | 3.93 | 1.34 | 6.79 | 6.48 | 3.11 | 2.43 | 7.97 | 6.54 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.90 | 1.90 | 6.00 | 6.40 | 8.57 | 3.02 | -2.22 | 5.58 | 6.78 | 1.13 | -0.47 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 1.48 | 1.05 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.14 | 1.11 | 0.98 | 1.09 | 1.42 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.26 | 1.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 1.03 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 1.08 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.42 | 0.30 |
| Inventory Turnover | 20.83 | 20.83 | 27.80 | 26.07 | 31.62 | 27.65 | 18.25 | 23.98 | 28.66 | 30.50 | 40.86 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 28.98 | 22.20 | 31.38 | 32.65 | 49.40 | 68.77 | 55.25 | 9.85 | 29.89 | 48.93 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.9% | 6.3% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 2.6% | 1.0% | 0.6% | 0.2% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 48.7% | 48.7% | 31.2% | 26.8% | 10.8% | 11.8% | — | 4.2% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 10.0% | 13.0% | 19.5% | 22.6% | 24.3% | 8.6% | — | 4.2% | 8.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 56.8% | 20.8% | 32.3% | 12.4% | 11.9% | 7.9% | 14.6% | 6.1% | 16.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.9% | 6.4% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 0.5% | 5.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.9% | 6.3% | 15.0% | 12.4% | 6.5% | 2.7% | 1.1% | 5.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $52M | $53M | $57M | $60M | $61M | $61M | $63M | $65M | $61M | $60M |
Colombian Regulatory Policy Uncertainty
According to current market data, GPRK trades at a forward P/E of 6.82, which suggests that investors are pricing in significant terminal value risk for the company's core Colombian assets rather than anticipating a return to the historical growth rates observed in previous fiscal periods.
The current valuation multiples appear to reflect a deep discount compared to broader energy sector averages, likely driven by the market's skepticism regarding reserve replacement. This low forward P/E indicates that the market is not assigning a premium for the company's cash-generative capacity, instead favoring a conservative outlook on long-term production sustainability.
Based on reported financial figures, ROIC has trended downward from 11.2% in 2024Q2 to 6.5% in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is struggling to maintain its historical compounding efficiency as the core Llanos 34 block matures and requires higher capital intensity to sustain output.
The decline in return on invested capital suggests that the marginal cost of finding and developing new reserves is rising, which may be eroding the competitive advantage of the company's low-cost production base. Investors should monitor whether management can improve these returns through successful exploration in newer, less-proven jurisdictions like Ecuador.
As reported in quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has remained deeply negative, fluctuating between -17 and -165 days, which suggests that GeoPark benefits from significant supplier leverage but faces operational volatility that complicates the predictability of its working capital management and overall liquidity position.
The extreme swings in the cash conversion cycle appear to be driven by the timing of large-scale logistics and pipeline tariff payments rather than fundamental shifts in operational efficiency. This volatility warrants further investigation, as it may mask underlying trends in how effectively the company manages its trade payables and receivables.
According to recent balance sheet data, the debt-to-equity ratio of 2.36 indicates a disciplined capital structure that remains relatively stable, providing the company with a defensive buffer against the cyclicality of Brent crude prices and potential regulatory shocks within the Colombian energy sector.
The company's ability to maintain a manageable leverage profile despite revenue contraction suggests a prudent approach to capital allocation that prioritizes balance sheet health over aggressive, debt-funded expansion. This positioning may offer the company optionality to pursue inorganic growth opportunities if regional peers face liquidity constraints.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to GPRK, as it fails to account for the non-cash nature of reserve depletion and the significant impact of Colombian tax changes on reported net income, which often obscures the company's actual ability to generate distributable cash flow.
Analysts should instead prioritize the operating netback per barrel and free cash flow yield, as these metrics better capture the underlying profitability of the production assets. Relying on P/E ratios in this context may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's value, as it ignores the specific accounting nuances inherent in the E&P business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GPRK stock.
GeoPark Limited's current P/E ratio is 10.0x. The historical average is 29.4x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
GeoPark Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 3.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.1x.
GeoPark Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 22.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 2.8%.
Based on historical data, GeoPark Limited is trading at a P/E of 10.0x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
GeoPark Limited's current dividend yield is 4.88% with a payout ratio of 48.7%.
GeoPark Limited has 47.6% gross margin and 31.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
GeoPark Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.