Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 62.8x · EV/EBITDA 7.8x · ROE 3.8%. (2015–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $943M | $1.1B | $780M | $1.2B | $2.0B | $2.9B | $4.4B | $2.2B | $5.4B | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.2B | $1.8B | $2.5B | $3.2B | $4.5B | $2.5B | $5.4B | $3.8B | $1.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 62.79 | 49.86 | 8.20 | 21.16 | 27.90 | 30.26 | 61.33 | 14.63 | 37.52 | 38.86 | 76.00 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.92 | 1.67 | 2.62 | 4.83 | 2.31 | 6.46 | 6.30 | 4.03 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.17 | 1.73 | 1.40 | 2.90 | 4.26 | 6.72 | 7.55 | 6.05 | 13.45 | 15.30 | 11.14 |
| P/FCF | 9.46 | 7.66 | 2.85 | 11.36 | 29.81 | 25.12 | 38.12 | 11055.74 | 222.70 | 40.32 | 124.67 |
| P/OCF | 6.97 | 5.65 | 2.67 | 7.46 | 17.48 | 18.96 | 28.77 | 42.93 | 73.12 | 29.53 | 41.40 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.96 | 0.88 | 1.36 | 2.05 | 2.92 | 4.99 | 2.58 | 6.53 | 6.37 | 4.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.78 | 6.63 | 5.68 | 10.53 | 9.74 | 12.56 | 30.42 | 10.12 | 24.72 | 24.74 | 36.00 |
| EV / EBIT | 19.30 | 16.44 | 7.37 | 10.99 | 16.83 | 19.10 | 47.83 | 13.76 | 27.59 | 27.33 | 42.02 |
| EV / FCF | — | 10.33 | 4.34 | 16.76 | 36.67 | 28.03 | 39.39 | 12362.16 | 225.05 | 40.77 | 135.11 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 61.1% | 69.9% | 68.8% | 67.0% | 66.8% | 60.3% | 61.9% | 62.2% | 58.8% | 52.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 5.8% | 12.2% | 9.3% | 12.1% | 14.5% | 12.9% | 19.5% | 23.7% | 23.4% | 10.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.5% | 1.5% | 7.0% | 4.4% | 6.0% | 8.6% | 7.8% | 15.4% | 17.3% | 16.2% | 5.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.8% | 3.8% | 19.3% | 13.0% | 16.1% | 18.8% | 14.9% | 38.7% | 44.7% | 49.3% | 15.0% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | 6.1% | 3.8% | 5.0% | 6.7% | 6.2% | 19.6% | 22.5% | 20.7% | 5.9% |
| ROIC | 6.8% | 6.8% | 12.5% | 9.6% | 13.0% | 16.1% | 13.0% | 25.9% | 39.8% | 36.5% | 10.9% |
| ROCE | 6.7% | 6.7% | 13.3% | 10.3% | 12.9% | 14.0% | 12.6% | 30.4% | 39.2% | 37.8% | 13.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.72 | 1.58 | 1.45 | 1.08 | 0.78 | 0.36 | 0.56 | 1.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.55 | 4.23 | 2.94 | 2.43 | 4.20 | 1.16 | 0.66 | 0.90 | 2.98 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.60 | 0.73 | 1.38 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.25 | 0.71 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.71 | 1.71 | 1.95 | 3.39 | 1.82 | 1.30 | 0.98 | 1.07 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 2.78 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.67 | 1.49 | 5.40 | 6.85 | 2.91 | 1.26 | 1306.42 | 2.35 | 0.45 | 10.44 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.54 | 2.54 | 3.93 | 3.87 | 4.63 | 5.85 | 4.14 | 11.73 | 17.87 | 10.70 | 4.22 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.63 | 2.63 | 2.67 | 2.39 | 2.45 | 2.71 | 3.42 | 2.55 | 3.02 | 2.25 | 2.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.50 | 0.95 | 1.11 | 1.31 | 2.12 | 0.57 | 1.07 | 1.01 | 0.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.02 | 0.47 | 0.81 | 1.02 | 1.82 | 0.15 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 1.22 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.06 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 1.05 | 1.26 | 1.17 | 1.47 | 1.53 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 30.64 | 25.17 | 19.27 | 15.54 | 14.55 | 16.52 | 11.86 | 10.72 | 10.50 | 11.68 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.6% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1173.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.6% | 2.0% | 12.2% | 4.7% | 3.6% | 3.3% | 1.6% | 6.8% | 2.7% | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| FCF Yield | 10.6% | 13.1% | 35.1% | 8.8% | 3.4% | 4.0% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.5% | 0.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.5% | 1.3% | 8.8% | 5.8% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.5% | 1.3% | 8.8% | 5.8% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 19.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $99M | $98M | $102M | $106M | $109M | $111M | $111M | $112M | $112M | $102M |
Seasonal inventory demand volatility
According to recent market data, the company trades at a TTM P/E of 62.36, which appears disconnected from its 1.47% net margin, suggesting that investors are pricing in a significant recovery in profitability that may not materialize if seasonal demand continues to fluctuate as observed in filings.
The forward P/E of 12.06 implies that the market expects a sharp rebound in earnings, yet this valuation assumes a level of operational consistency that the company has historically struggled to maintain. Investors should monitor whether the current valuation premium over broader apparel peers is justified by brand equity or if it represents an overly optimistic outlook on the DTC transition.
Based on reported financial statements, the company's ROIC has shown significant volatility, peaking at 14.7% in 2026Q3 before contracting to 4.9% in 2026Q4, which indicates that the capital deployed into new retail locations is not yet generating consistent, compounding returns for shareholders relative to historical performance.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy is highly sensitive to seasonal sell-through rates. If the company cannot stabilize its ROIC above its cost of capital during non-peak quarters, the long-term value creation of its aggressive retail expansion strategy warrants further investigation.
As reported in recent filings, the company's cash conversion cycle reached 175 days in 2026Q4, a figure that highlights the structural difficulty of managing inventory in a seasonal luxury business where DIO often exceeds 200 days, creating significant pressure on the company's liquidity and operational cash flow.
The high DIO suggests that the company is carrying substantial inventory risk, which could lead to margin-eroding markdowns if consumer demand softens. The reliance on long-dated inventory cycles implies that the company's working capital efficiency is structurally inferior to peers with faster-turning product lines, necessitating a cautious approach to inventory management.
According to the latest balance sheet data, the company's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.25 in 2026Q4, combined with interest coverage that swings into negative territory during off-peak quarters, suggests that the company's ability to service its debt is heavily dependent on the success of its winter-season sales performance.
While the current leverage level appears manageable, the volatility in interest coverage ratios indicates that the company lacks the financial flexibility to absorb prolonged periods of weak demand. Investors should monitor whether the company's debt structure remains sustainable if the current trend of narrow net margins persists through future fiscal cycles.
Based on an analysis of the company's business model, the P/E ratio is a frequently misapplied metric that obscures the true earning power of the firm, as it fails to account for the extreme seasonal volatility and the high fixed-cost burden inherent in the company's retail-heavy strategy.
Instead of relying on P/E, analysts should focus on EV/EBITDA or cash-flow-based metrics to better understand the company's ability to generate sustainable returns across the full fiscal year. The P/E ratio is particularly misleading here because it treats seasonal losses in off-peak quarters as permanent, which distorts the perceived valuation of the company's core luxury business.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GOOS stock.
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 62.8x. The historical average is 36.6x. This places it at the 90th percentile of its historical range.
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.1x.
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.8%. The historical average is 22.2%.
Based on historical data, Canada Goose Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of 62.8x. This is at the 90th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Canada Goose Holdings Inc. has 61.1% gross margin and 5.8% operating margin.
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.