Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -231.3%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10M | $752796 | $128M | $132M | $139M | $187M | $58M | $49M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-22538483 | $-31594204 | $136M | $141M | $152M | $206M | $39M | $15M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.25 | 0.17 | 9.64 | 2.02 | 1.01 | 1.13 | 0.42 | 0.26 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.01 | 20.36 | 12.04 | 3.55 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -7.25 | 10.22 | 2.16 | 1.11 | 1.24 | 0.29 | 0.08 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -286.2% | -286.2% | 47.3% | 27.3% | 18.2% | 20.4% | 16.5% | 16.8% | 20.0% | 23.3% | 12.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1245.6% | -1245.6% | -89.0% | -39.9% | -134.3% | -31.7% | -35.4% | -13.5% | -1.4% | 3.1% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1965.1% | -1965.1% | -132.9% | -49.2% | -123.7% | -18.4% | -10.5% | -15.6% | -3.3% | 2.6% | 0.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -231.3% | -231.3% | -204.2% | -128.7% | -144.0% | -23.0% | -15.8% | -55.7% | — | 27.2% | 1.2% |
| ROA | -165.3% | -165.3% | -52.9% | -50.4% | -90.3% | -15.0% | -10.5% | -24.9% | -10.9% | 10.1% | 0.5% |
| ROIC | -164.6% | -164.6% | -52.5% | -54.3% | -103.2% | -29.7% | -56.1% | -33.8% | -9.5% | 24.5% | 1.1% |
| ROCE | -146.4% | -146.4% | -128.6% | -79.0% | -136.9% | -35.7% | -47.1% | -28.5% | -8.4% | 27.7% | 1.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.38 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.12 | — | 0.08 | 0.38 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.21 | 4.03 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.48 | 1.24 | 0.79 | 0.34 | 0.10 | -0.27 | -0.30 | — | -0.14 | 0.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.39 | 1.61 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.60 | 0.44 |
| Interest Coverage | -216.19 | -216.19 | -1.97 | -4.93 | -73.38 | -92.05 | -107.72 | -28.63 | -0.74 | 10.17 | 2.07 |
Net cash position: cash ($33M) exceeds total debt ($166000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.01 | 5.01 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 2.15 | 1.76 | 2.30 | 4.39 | 1.88 | 1.19 | 1.55 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.01 | 5.01 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 1.01 | 0.81 | 1.16 | 2.74 | 0.91 | 0.47 | 0.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.51 | 4.51 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.73 | 1.82 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.26 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.46 | 1.72 | 1.53 | 0.58 | 1.13 | 1.21 | 2.29 | 2.98 | 4.17 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 0.49 | 2.32 | 2.76 | 1.97 | 2.44 | 3.55 | 4.85 | 4.78 | 8.82 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 131.75 | 117.18 | 16.79 | 36.16 | 42.87 | 28.29 | 15.96 | 16.76 | 15.55 | 7.32 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1% | 1.0% | 1.8% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.3% | 494.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.2% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 1.0% | 9.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $59936 | $12920 | $3872 | $730 | $187 | $58 | $49 | $51 | $51 | $51 |
Total business model collapse
According to current market data, GNLN trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 2.30, a multiple that appears disconnected from the company's negative gross margins and the severe 67.19% year-over-year revenue decline, suggesting that investors are pricing the equity as a speculative option rather than a going concern.
The lack of meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples underscores the absence of core earnings power, rendering traditional valuation metrics largely irrelevant for this entity. Investors should monitor whether the current market capitalization reflects the liquidation value of the intellectual property portfolio or merely a residual premium for potential restructuring outcomes.
As reported in recent financial statements, Greenlane's gross margin has plummeted to -286.22%, a figure that highlights a fundamental misalignment between the company's cost structure and its current revenue generation, which has contracted significantly compared to historical performance levels observed in previous fiscal periods.
This extreme margin profile suggests that the company is likely incurring heavy inventory write-downs or carrying stranded overhead costs that cannot be supported by the current, diminished revenue base. Such persistent negative profitability warrants extreme caution, as it implies that the core business model is currently incapable of covering its own direct costs of production.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's ROIC has consistently remained in negative territory, reaching -11.6% in 2026Q1, which demonstrates a sustained inability to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the firm's cost of funding or even maintain the integrity of the capital base.
The trend of decaying returns on capital suggests that previous investments in brand acquisitions and infrastructure have failed to yield the expected economic benefits. This persistent destruction of capital indicates that the firm's current operational strategy is not creating value for shareholders and may require a radical pivot to reverse the ongoing erosion of equity.
Data from recent filings indicates that the cash conversion cycle remains highly volatile, with DSO reaching 247 days in 2026Q1, a significant deterioration that suggests the company is struggling to collect receivables effectively while managing its remaining inventory and supplier obligations in a shrinking market environment.
The extended collection periods and erratic asset turnover ratios imply that the company's working capital management is under severe stress, likely exacerbated by the loss of key retail partners. Investors should monitor these efficiency metrics closely, as they serve as a leading indicator of the firm's ability to manage its remaining cash runway.
Analysts frequently misapply the price-to-sales ratio to Greenlane, failing to account for the fact that the company's revenue is currently burdened by massive, non-recurring inventory liquidations that distort the underlying demand for its proprietary lifestyle brands and mask the true, much smaller, core revenue run-rate.
Using revenue multiples in this context obscures the reality that the firm is effectively a distressed asset portfolio rather than a functional consumer goods distributor. A more appropriate analytical framework would involve valuing the company based on the estimated liquidation value of its intellectual property and brand assets, rather than its top-line performance.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GNLN stock.
Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -231.3%. The historical average is -86.0%.
Based on historical data, Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has -286.2% gross margin and -1245.6% operating margin.