Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -110.0%. (2020–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8M | $186M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $51M | $228M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.08 | 1.79 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.18 | 3.84 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.20 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 28.7% | 28.7% | 20.9% | 12.2% | 27.7% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | -29.7% | -29.7% | -40.1% | -60.8% | -195.4% | -226.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -51.4% | -51.4% | -101.7% | -77.3% | -235.5% | -262.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -110.0% | -110.0% | — | -808.6% | -273.8% | -111.9% |
| ROA | -40.0% | -40.0% | -66.8% | -57.6% | -77.3% | -55.3% |
| ROIC | -29.8% | -29.8% | -35.9% | -59.1% | -116.6% | -84.6% |
| ROCE | -42.6% | -42.6% | -51.5% | -95.8% | -161.7% | -77.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 8.00 | 6.44 | 0.56 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.88 | — | 7.41 | 5.15 | -0.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.61 | -3.61 | -4.86 | -9.07 | -81.52 | -45.17 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.21 | 1.12 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.90 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.65 | 4.65 | 4.68 | 4.09 | 3.45 | 3.58 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 85.88 | 92.07 | 101.92 | 77.32 | 108.09 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $19M | $19M | $19M | $19M | $19M |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
According to recent market data, Gauzy's P/S ratio of 0.09 suggests that investors are heavily discounting the company's future revenue potential, likely due to the persistent negative net margins and the significant capital requirements needed to sustain its current high-growth, high-burn business model.
The extremely low P/S multiple indicates that the market is pricing the firm as a distressed asset rather than a high-growth technology player. This valuation suggests that investors are skeptical of the company's ability to reach a scale where unit economics turn positive, warranting caution regarding the sustainability of its current market capitalization.
As reported in financial statements, Gauzy's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -11.4% in 2025Q2, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its heavy investments in specialized manufacturing and R&D infrastructure.
The persistent negative return on invested capital highlights a fundamental mismatch between the capital deployed into clean-room facilities and the actual returns generated from product sales. This trend suggests that the company's current operational model is not yet capable of generating returns that exceed its cost of capital, necessitating a strategic pivot.
Based on the reported figures, Gauzy's cash conversion cycle of 48 days in 2025Q2, while improved from previous periods, masks underlying inefficiencies in inventory management and collection cycles that continue to pressure the company's already limited liquidity position in a challenging macroeconomic environment.
The high days inventory outstanding (DIO) of 100 days suggests that the company is struggling to move its specialized film products through the supply chain efficiently. This inefficiency ties up critical cash that could otherwise be used to fund operations, further exacerbating the company's reliance on external financing.
According to recent SEC filings, Gauzy's debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to 3.54 in 2025Q2, signaling a significant increase in financial leverage that appears increasingly unsustainable given the company's inability to generate positive operating cash flow to service its mounting debt obligations.
The negative interest coverage ratio of -3.66 confirms that the company is currently unable to cover its interest expenses from operating income. This leverage profile suggests that the firm is highly vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations and may face significant challenges in refinancing its existing debt without further dilution.
Investors often misapply revenue growth as a primary indicator of success for Gauzy, failing to recognize that in this capital-intensive hardware model, top-line expansion without corresponding improvements in gross margins serves to accelerate cash burn rather than signal long-term operational viability.
Focusing on revenue growth obscures the reality that the company's gross margin of 21.4% is insufficient to cover the high fixed costs of its manufacturing base. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the contribution margin per unit or the path to positive free cash flow, which better reflects the underlying health of the firm.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GAUZ stock.
Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares's current P/E ratio is -0.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is -110.0%. The historical average is -165.2%.
Based on historical data, Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares is trading at a P/E of -0.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares has 28.7% gross margin and -29.7% operating margin.