Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -72.2%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $1.3B | $419M | $899M | $131M | $352M | $84M | $162M | $96M | $60M | $89M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $1.3B | $342M | $623M | $81M | $213M | $81M | $190M | $75M | $61M | $74M |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 37.45 | 42.66 | 9.69 | 19.54 | 3.15 | 9.53 | 2.45 | 7.94 | 32.47 | 8.02 | 55.24 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.35 | 4.37 | 1.25 | 3.38 | 1.36 | 1.91 | 4.56 | 19.41 | 8.23 | 4.53 | 4.29 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 479.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 40.08 | 7.89 | 13.53 | 1.96 | 5.76 | 2.34 | 9.33 | 25.22 | 8.07 | 45.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 93.4% | 93.4% | 91.4% | 89.9% | 79.9% | 77.9% | 83.1% | 86.8% | -524.9% | 100.0% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -776.0% | -776.0% | -337.1% | -163.1% | -240.6% | -149.6% | -108.3% | -235.0% | -887.3% | -246.4% | -1344.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -739.4% | -739.4% | -302.4% | -153.8% | -247.0% | -158.1% | -131.8% | -278.9% | -1795.7% | -245.2% | -1330.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -72.2% | -72.2% | -43.4% | -39.0% | -72.8% | -57.6% | -337.9% | -567.4% | -425.0% | -108.0% | -97.4% |
| ROA | -59.3% | -59.3% | -33.8% | -26.4% | -46.1% | -32.9% | -55.1% | -78.5% | -117.7% | -73.5% | -67.3% |
| ROIC | -75.5% | -75.5% | -88.0% | -303.9% | -162.3% | -139.1% | -108.9% | -266.5% | -993.5% | -144.3% | -332.8% |
| ROCE | -69.9% | -69.9% | -44.1% | -34.3% | -51.7% | -34.9% | -53.9% | -85.9% | -82.9% | -93.1% | -78.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.21 | 2.21 | 6.07 | 1.48 | 1.30 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.26 | -0.23 | -1.04 | -0.51 | -0.76 | -0.21 | 3.41 | -1.84 | 0.03 | -0.73 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7376.79 | -7376.79 | -9340.43 | -55.71 | -31.06 | -9.63 | -5.26 | -8.20 | -54.19 | -72.85 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($102M) exceeds total debt ($21M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.88 | 8.88 | 7.81 | 5.45 | 5.00 | 10.05 | 4.24 | 3.62 | 1.84 | 3.35 | 5.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 8.83 | 8.83 | 7.77 | 5.39 | 4.92 | 9.90 | 3.88 | 3.44 | 1.86 | 3.40 | 5.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 8.27 | 8.27 | 7.56 | 5.23 | 4.19 | 8.94 | 3.02 | 1.93 | 1.79 | 3.19 | 5.69 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.61 | 1.19 | 2.88 | 2.26 | 1.09 | 1.26 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 7.57 | 5.12 | 6.38 | 136.67 | 181.36 | 100.19 | 203.75 | 43.51 | 17.09 | 56.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $73M | $56M | $39M | $37M | $29M | $13M | $10M | $5M | $4M | $3M |
Clinical trial funding runway
According to current market data, EyePoint trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 36.49, a valuation that appears to price in significant clinical success for the EYP-1901 program rather than reflecting the company's current, substantially reduced revenue base following the strategic divestiture of its commercial assets.
The elevated P/S ratio suggests that investors are valuing the firm as a high-growth biotechnology pipeline rather than a specialty pharmaceutical company. This valuation implies a high probability of regulatory approval, as the current revenue figures are insufficient to justify such a premium on a fundamental basis.
As reported in financial statements, EyePoint's ROIC has deteriorated to -32.9% in 2026Q1, illustrating a consistent trend of value destruction as the company aggressively deploys capital into non-revenue-generating clinical trials while failing to achieve the necessary scale to offset its high fixed-cost R&D structure.
The negative return on capital is a direct consequence of the company's pivot toward a capital-intensive, pipeline-focused model. Investors should monitor whether the eventual commercialization of the Durasert platform can reverse this trend, as current returns remain deeply suppressed by the lack of operational efficiency.
Based on reported figures, the company's cash conversion cycle has remained deeply negative, reaching -5600 days in 2026Q1, which reflects the extreme disconnect between the company's minimal commercial activity and the massive, non-discretionary cash outflows required to sustain its ongoing clinical trial operations and vendor obligations.
The erratic nature of the CCC, characterized by extreme swings in days payable outstanding, suggests that management is actively managing cash outflows to preserve liquidity. This operational inefficiency is typical of clinical-stage firms but warrants further investigation into the sustainability of vendor relationships as cash reserves continue to dwindle.
As indicated by recent SEC filings, EyePoint's current ratio of 6.66 provides a superficial appearance of liquidity, yet this metric masks the reality that the company's cash reserves are being rapidly consumed by the high-burn requirements of its Phase 3 clinical trials for the EYP-1901 program.
While the current ratio appears healthy compared to peers, it is misleading in a pre-revenue context where the primary asset is a depleting cash balance. The company's liquidity position is highly vulnerable to any delays in clinical readouts, which would necessitate further dilutive financing to maintain operations.
Based on an analysis of the company's business model, the price-to-sales ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric, as it fails to account for the structural shift from a commercial product-sales model to a royalty-based income stream following the divestiture of the YUTIQ asset.
Using P/S to evaluate EyePoint obscures the underlying value of the pipeline, as the current revenue figures are essentially legacy remnants. Analysts should instead focus on the net present value of the pipeline or cash-burn-to-runway metrics, which provide a more accurate assessment of the company's true economic viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EYPT stock.
EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -4.4x. The historical average is 13.0x.
EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -72.2%. The historical average is -90.9%.
Based on historical data, EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -4.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has 93.4% gross margin and -776.0% operating margin.