Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -13.8x · EV/EBITDA 97.0x · ROE -77.8%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.1B | $267M | $211M | $367M | $421M | $596M | $232M | $226M | $263M | $657M | $639M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $421M | $352M | $523M | $571M | $652M | $365M | $459M | $460M | $913M | $868M |
| P/E Ratio → | -13.84 | — | — | — | 22.86 | 20.55 | — | — | 22.38 | 3.74 | 31.82 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.45 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 1.23 | 1.30 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 1.23 | 2.47 |
| P/B Ratio | 19.56 | 4.82 | 1.45 | 1.38 | 1.48 | 2.32 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 1.88 | 3.48 |
| P/FCF | 311.69 | 75.99 | 3.19 | 7.66 | 6.25 | 10.03 | 4.27 | 57.11 | 19.28 | 2.56 | 13.25 |
| P/OCF | 102.85 | 25.08 | 2.83 | 4.87 | 5.34 | 9.13 | 3.65 | 7.16 | 7.78 | 2.18 | 11.15 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.94 | 0.96 | 1.76 | 1.76 | 0.86 | 1.06 | 1.68 | 1.54 | 1.70 | 3.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 96.98 | 32.69 | — | 346.31 | 10.14 | 7.86 | 15.28 | 30.63 | 9.10 | 3.09 | 13.44 |
| EV / EBIT | 2305.27 | 777.16 | — | — | 17.40 | 10.69 | 43.53 | 194.35 | 12.37 | 3.32 | 17.72 |
| EV / FCF | — | 119.87 | 5.32 | 10.93 | 8.46 | 10.96 | 6.73 | 116.09 | 33.71 | 3.55 | 17.99 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | 21.1% | 34.7% | 35.9% | 44.5% | 23.3% | 38.4% | 42.9% | 42.8% | 69.4% | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 0.1% | -14.2% | -8.9% | 9.4% | 8.0% | 1.9% | -0.6% | 11.3% | 51.9% | 18.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -17.5% | -17.5% | -40.8% | -5.2% | 5.6% | 3.9% | -1.1% | -7.2% | 4.1% | 32.9% | 7.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -77.8% | -77.8% | -72.2% | -5.6% | 6.7% | 10.3% | -1.3% | -6.3% | 3.6% | 66.2% | 11.6% |
| ROA | -17.9% | -17.9% | -22.0% | -1.8% | 2.1% | 3.7% | -0.6% | -2.9% | 1.7% | 27.5% | 3.9% |
| ROIC | 0.2% | 0.2% | -11.0% | -4.6% | 6.1% | 12.0% | 1.0% | -0.2% | 4.4% | 41.1% | 8.6% |
| ROCE | 0.2% | 0.2% | -10.2% | -4.3% | 4.9% | 9.8% | 1.1% | -0.3% | 5.0% | 46.9% | 10.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.85 | 3.85 | 1.62 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 1.58 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 16.58 | 16.58 | — | 173.70 | 4.62 | 2.90 | 10.57 | 17.77 | 4.82 | 1.00 | 4.50 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.78 | 0.96 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.22 | 0.43 | 0.81 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 1.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 11.97 | 11.97 | — | 103.73 | 2.66 | 0.67 | 5.58 | 15.56 | 3.90 | 0.87 | 3.54 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 43.88 | 2.13 | 3.27 | 2.22 | 0.93 | 2.46 | 58.98 | 14.43 | 1.00 | 4.75 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.04 | 0.04 | -3.02 | -1.47 | 3.11 | 8.68 | 1.01 | 0.17 | 2.36 | 16.48 | 3.17 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 3.02 | 1.42 | 1.64 | 1.82 | 2.26 | 3.17 | 5.02 | 5.64 | 3.80 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 3.02 | 1.42 | 1.64 | 1.82 | 2.26 | 3.17 | 5.02 | 5.64 | 3.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 1.63 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.82 | 1.07 | 1.89 | 3.32 | 0.63 | 1.78 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.16 | 0.75 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.89 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.50 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 77.40 | 68.60 | 289.79 | 253.16 | 96.87 | 150.66 | 95.27 | 97.20 | 57.43 | 91.88 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.7% | 6.8% | 8.5% | 4.8% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 4.5% | 7.5% | 6.8% | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 47.1% | 29.1% | — | — | 146.2% | 8.3% | 54.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 4.4% | 4.9% | — | — | 4.5% | 26.7% | 3.1% |
| FCF Yield | 0.3% | 1.3% | 31.4% | 13.1% | 16.0% | 10.0% | 23.4% | 1.8% | 5.2% | 39.1% | 7.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 5.6% | 5.3% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.7% | 6.8% | 9.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 1.4% | 4.8% | 13.1% | 12.0% | 3.0% | 1.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $91M | $90M | $88M | $88M | $88M | $84M | $86M | $90M | $92M | $91M |
Digital segment margin volatility
Based on reported figures, Entravision’s negative TTM P/E of -13.99 and elevated EV/EBITDA of 97.91 suggest that the market is pricing the company as a distressed legacy broadcaster rather than a growth-oriented digital platform, reflecting deep skepticism regarding the long-term scalability of its current business model.
The valuation gap compared to peers like Nexstar suggests investors are discounting the company's digital pivot due to the thin operating margins and the recent loss of key platform partnerships. This pricing implies that the market views the current earnings profile as unsustainable, warranting further investigation into whether the digital segment can achieve a valuation premium independent of its broadcast roots.
As reported in financial statements, Entravision’s ROIC has experienced extreme volatility, swinging from a negative 14.5% in 2025Q1 to a positive 11.3% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is struggling to consistently compound returns on invested capital during its transition toward digital-first operations.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that capital allocation is currently being disrupted by non-recurring impairments and the integration costs of digital acquisitions. Investors should monitor whether the recent improvement in ROIC is a sustainable trend or merely a temporary artifact of aggressive cost-cutting and balance sheet downsizing.
According to recent SEC filings, Entravision’s DSO has fluctuated wildly, reaching a high of 151 days in 2024Q2, which suggests that the company faces significant challenges in managing its cash conversion cycle and maintaining consistent leverage over its diverse customer base in both broadcast and digital segments.
The lack of stability in working capital metrics indicates that the company's operational efficiency is highly sensitive to the timing of large digital ad campaigns and political advertising cycles. This inconsistency may imply that the company lacks the necessary scale to enforce favorable payment terms, leaving it vulnerable to liquidity pressures during off-cycle periods.
Based on quarterly filings, Entravision’s debt-to-EBITDA ratio has shown extreme instability, peaking at 103.01 in 2025Q2, which indicates that the company's ability to service its debt is currently highly sensitive to earnings volatility and the erosion of its core broadcast profitability.
While the debt-to-equity ratio of 1.05 in 2026Q1 appears manageable on the surface, the underlying interest coverage ratios suggest that the company has little margin for error in a rising rate environment. The reliance on volatile digital revenue to support debt service warrants close monitoring, as any further contraction in margins could quickly jeopardize the company's financial flexibility.
As indicated by the company's evolving revenue mix, the most commonly misapplied metric for Entravision is the traditional P/E ratio, which fails to account for the significant non-cash impairments and the high-volume, low-margin nature of the digital reseller business that currently dominates the top line.
Analysts should instead focus on the 'Digital Take Rate' and net margin on digital services to better understand the company's true earning power, as the P/E ratio obscures the impact of the transition from high-margin linear TV to programmatic ad-tech. Relying on legacy broadcasting valuation multiples likely leads to an inaccurate assessment of the company's long-term growth potential and operational risks.
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EVC stock.
Entravision Communications Corporation's current P/E ratio is -13.8x. The historical average is 20.1x.
Entravision Communications Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 97.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.0x.
Entravision Communications Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -77.8%. The historical average is -27.4%.
Based on historical data, Entravision Communications Corporation is trading at a P/E of -13.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Entravision Communications Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.68%.
Entravision Communications Corporation has 21.1% gross margin and 0.1% operating margin.
Entravision Communications Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 16.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.