Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.2x · EV/EBITDA 8.0x · ROE 35.1%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.8B | $2.9B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $608M | $394M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.3B | $3.5B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.8B | $741M | $482M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.23 | 10.97 | — | 16.11 | 12.50 | 6.92 | 28.96 | 18.04 | — | 17.54 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.44 | 3.68 | 2.96 | 3.51 | 2.97 | 2.84 | 4.62 | 5.85 | 2.61 | 2.65 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.94 | 3.15 | 2.35 | 1.85 | 2.34 | 3.52 | 6.99 | 8.36 | 5.85 | 3.03 | — |
| P/FCF | 30.18 | 32.30 | — | — | — | 7.61 | 33.22 | 77.24 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 7.68 | 8.22 | 9.56 | 9.19 | 8.84 | 3.81 | 9.19 | 13.03 | 7.33 | 18.53 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.34 | 4.17 | 4.29 | 3.56 | 2.71 | 4.95 | 6.34 | 3.18 | 3.25 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.99 | 8.46 | 9.50 | 9.79 | 8.14 | 4.17 | 14.45 | 14.95 | 7.98 | 14.89 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 12.13 | 12.84 | 18.39 | 14.02 | 10.30 | 5.47 | 22.40 | 18.70 | 42.03 | 26.81 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 38.06 | — | — | — | 7.26 | 35.60 | 83.74 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 43.2% | 38.4% | 36.7% | 43.9% | 65.1% | 58.1% | 41.1% | 35.3% | 12.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.8% | 33.8% | 25.7% | 22.3% | 29.9% | 55.3% | — | 27.5% | 19.8% | -5.1% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | 33.6% | 33.6% | -14.6% | 21.7% | 23.9% | 41.0% | 15.9% | 32.3% | -1.4% | 15.2% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 35.1% | 35.1% | -9.8% | 13.7% | 21.7% | 66.0% | 25.0% | 60.7% | -2.7% | 29.2% | -12.3% |
| ROA | 15.9% | 15.9% | -4.6% | 6.9% | 10.8% | 33.9% | 10.8% | 22.3% | -0.9% | 6.4% | -0.9% |
| ROIC | 15.5% | 15.5% | 7.9% | 7.4% | 17.0% | 62.3% | — | 20.4% | 15.2% | -2.9% | -2.4% |
| ROCE | 18.6% | 18.6% | 9.4% | 7.9% | 15.7% | 55.8% | — | 23.0% | 14.8% | -3.3% | -4.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.05 | 0.55 | 0.79 | 0.17 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 1.47 | 1.07 | 6.65 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.54 | 1.54 | 3.01 | 2.38 | 2.30 | 0.21 | 1.53 | 1.35 | 1.64 | 4.30 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.56 | 0.96 | 0.41 | 0.46 | -0.16 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 1.28 | 0.68 | 5.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.28 | 1.28 | 2.76 | 1.79 | 1.35 | -0.20 | 0.97 | 1.16 | 1.44 | 2.72 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.77 | — | — | — | -0.35 | 2.38 | 6.50 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 12.26 | 12.26 | 58.76 | 10.23 | 6.98 | 43.38 | 5.99 | 6.41 | 1.18 | 0.85 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.67 | 1.15 | 3.04 | 1.70 | 1.39 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 1.77 | 0.29 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.47 | 0.90 | 2.80 | 1.49 | 1.11 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 1.62 | 0.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 2.46 | 1.06 | 0.68 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.92 | 0.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.39 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.11 | 4.11 | 6.88 | 6.40 | 7.73 | 6.57 | 5.23 | 8.22 | 10.30 | 15.36 | 0.16 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 22.54 | 31.25 | 24.14 | 28.06 | 34.13 | 41.00 | 35.08 | 17.47 | 9.64 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.8% | 9.1% | — | 6.2% | 8.0% | 14.5% | 3.5% | 5.5% | — | 5.7% | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.3% | 3.1% | — | — | — | 13.1% | 3.0% | 1.3% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $104M | $103M | $95M | $92M | $91M | $92M | $91M | $84M | $66M | $49M |
Jurisdictional and commodity volatility
According to current market data, ERO trades at a forward P/E of 6.62, which, when compared to the broader copper peer group, suggests that investors are pricing in significant production growth while discounting the inherent risks of its concentrated Brazilian operational footprint.
The low PEG ratio of 0.29 indicates that the market may be undervaluing the company's near-term earnings growth trajectory relative to its current valuation multiples. This valuation gap warrants further investigation into whether the market is overly skeptical of the company's ability to sustain its high-grade production profile as it scales.
Based on reported figures, ROIC has shown a volatile but upward trend, reaching 4.4% in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company is beginning to see the benefits of its recent capital-intensive investments in the MCSA Mining Complex and the Tucumã project.
While the return on capital remains modest compared to larger, more established peers, the trend indicates that management is successfully transitioning from a development-heavy phase to an operational-efficiency phase. Investors should monitor whether this improvement in ROIC can be sustained as the company moves toward full-scale production.
As reported in recent financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 29 days in 2026Q1, which highlights the company's sensitivity to the timing of concentrate shipments and the inherent complexities of managing inventory in a high-grade underground mining environment.
The variability in the cash conversion cycle suggests that working capital management is a primary driver of short-term liquidity, rather than just operational output. This volatility appears to be a structural feature of the company's concentrate-based revenue model, requiring careful monitoring of DSO and DIO trends.
According to quarterly balance sheet data, ERO maintained a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.55 in 2026Q1, demonstrating a disciplined approach to capital structure that remains conservative relative to the significant infrastructure development requirements of its core Brazilian mining operations.
The company's ability to maintain a manageable debt load while funding major projects suggests a strong internal cash generation capability. This financial positioning appears to provide a buffer against potential commodity price downturns, though investors should remain cautious of the impact of currency fluctuations on debt serviceability.
As noted in industry analysis, the P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to ERO, as it fails to account for the non-cash nature of depletion and the company's unique success in identifying 'blind' ore bodies that extend mine life beyond standard reserve estimates.
Relying solely on P/E ratios obscures the underlying value of the company's exploration-and-processing engine, which may sustain high margins longer than traditional depletion models suggest. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA and cash flow-based metrics to better capture the true earning power of the business.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ERO stock.
Ero Copper Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 10.2x. The historical average is 15.9x. This places it at the 14th percentile of its historical range.
Ero Copper Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.3x.
Ero Copper Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 35.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 22.7%.
Based on historical data, Ero Copper Corp. is trading at a P/E of 10.2x. This is at the 14th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ero Copper Corp. has 43.2% gross margin and 33.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Ero Copper Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.