Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.8x · EV/EBITDA 6.6x · ROE 12.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.4B | $7.4B | $3.1B | $2.5B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $2.3B | $1.3B | $457M | $1.1B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.9B | $7.8B | $3.1B | $2.7B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $2.4B | $1.6B | $773M | $1.2B | $2.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.76 | 14.31 | 10.55 | 24.02 | — | — | 17.46 | 15.75 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.48 | 3.99 | 2.31 | 2.51 | 1.76 | 1.79 | 2.26 | 2.11 | 0.99 | 2.75 | 5.33 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.54 | 1.73 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.65 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 123.01 | — | — | 21.00 | 10.61 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 9.39 | 10.75 | 5.13 | 6.61 | 7.27 | 4.65 | 5.46 | 7.82 | 6.88 | 38.47 | 20.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.22 | 2.37 | 2.63 | 2.03 | 1.82 | 2.34 | 2.64 | 1.68 | 3.04 | 4.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.62 | 7.52 | 4.65 | 5.94 | 6.23 | 4.09 | 4.99 | 5.38 | — | 31.12 | 14.12 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.95 | 13.41 | 7.55 | 13.68 | 37.58 | 7.62 | 9.34 | 10.35 | — | 298.32 | 34.91 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 126.26 | — | — | 21.38 | 10.95 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.9% | 44.9% | 56.5% | 26.7% | 19.7% | 31.0% | 35.4% | 20.8% | 18.3% | 32.2% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 41.5% | 41.5% | 31.7% | 18.0% | 4.8% | 23.1% | 25.4% | 23.8% | -103.9% | -9.8% | 15.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 27.9% | 27.9% | 21.9% | 10.4% | -40.6% | -14.4% | 12.2% | 13.1% | -78.8% | -2.5% | -79.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.6% | 12.6% | 7.8% | 3.1% | -10.3% | -3.7% | 3.5% | 2.4% | -10.2% | -0.3% | -9.2% |
| ROA | 8.2% | 8.2% | 5.3% | 2.2% | -7.5% | -2.8% | 2.6% | 1.7% | -7.4% | -0.2% | -6.7% |
| ROIC | 13.3% | 13.3% | 8.3% | 3.9% | 0.9% | 4.4% | 5.2% | 3.0% | -9.5% | -0.8% | 1.3% |
| ROCE | 13.5% | 13.5% | 8.3% | 4.1% | 0.9% | 4.7% | 5.7% | 3.3% | -10.1% | -0.8% | 1.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.39 | 1.48 | 1.81 | 1.22 | 1.10 | 1.67 | — | 15.52 | 4.14 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.03 | -0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.83 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 1.08 | — | 2.99 | -2.04 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 3.26 | — | — | 0.38 | 0.34 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 20.67 | 20.67 | 20.64 | 6.36 | 1.34 | 3.33 | 5.07 | 3.26 | -0.53 | 1.25 | 5.92 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.83 | 1.83 | 3.60 | 3.39 | 3.00 | 3.52 | 2.88 | 1.97 | 3.63 | 6.46 | 12.04 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 2.92 | 2.53 | 2.06 | 2.66 | 2.25 | 1.23 | 2.66 | 4.98 | 10.71 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 | 2.42 | 1.98 | 1.49 | 2.33 | 1.95 | 0.83 | 2.09 | 4.29 | 10.11 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.44 | 3.44 | 2.06 | 3.14 | 3.52 | 3.65 | 4.04 | 2.99 | 2.72 | 1.57 | 2.23 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 54.97 | 30.34 | 36.12 | 28.08 | 19.63 | 20.18 | 20.80 | 51.88 | 55.58 | 34.93 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.0% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.8% | 7.0% | 9.5% | 4.2% | — | — | 5.7% | 6.4% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 0.8% | — | — | 4.8% | 9.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.4% | 3.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.4% | 3.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $205M | $206M | $195M | $183M | $180M | $175M | $162M | $159M | $151M | $143M |
Capital intensive project execution
According to current market data, EGO trades at a forward P/E of 7.85, which appears to discount the company relative to peers like Agnico Eagle, suggesting investors remain cautious regarding the execution risks inherent in the Skouries project and the broader Mediterranean portfolio.
The current EV/EBITDA multiple of 6.49 indicates that the market is pricing in a significant risk premium compared to senior producers, likely due to the historical volatility of the Turkish and Greek operating environments. This valuation suggests that the market is not yet fully crediting the potential for a re-rating as the company transitions toward a more diversified gold-copper production profile.
Based on reported financial figures, EGO's ROIC has fluctuated between 1.2% and 4.5% over the last ten quarters, reflecting the drag of massive, non-productive capital expenditures currently tied up in the Skouries development phase rather than operational inefficiency.
The modest ROIC trend suggests that the company is currently in a capital-intensive phase where significant assets are not yet contributing to earnings. Investors should monitor whether these returns improve once the Skouries project reaches steady-state production, as the current figures likely understate the long-term compounding potential of the underlying assets.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has shown significant volatility, with DIO reaching 116 days in 2026Q1, indicating that inventory management remains a critical lever for maintaining liquidity during this period of heavy infrastructure investment.
The high days inventory outstanding suggests that the company may be holding significant gold-in-process, which ties up capital and impacts short-term cash flow. This efficiency profile warrants further investigation into whether these inventory levels are a structural necessity of the heap leach process or a temporary byproduct of current operational scaling.
According to the latest quarterly filings, EGO maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.29, which provides a robust buffer against commodity price volatility and allows the company to fund its aggressive capital expenditure program without relying on dilutive equity financing.
The interest coverage ratio of 37.76 in 2026Q1 suggests that the company is comfortably servicing its existing debt obligations despite the current cash burn. This balance sheet strength appears to be a key differentiator, allowing management to navigate the high-friction regulatory environments in Greece and Turkey with greater financial flexibility than more levered peers.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to EGO, as it fails to account for the significant non-cash depreciation and amortization charges associated with the company's heavy mining infrastructure, which obscures the true underlying cash-generating power of the operating assets.
Investors should prioritize EV/EBITDA or P/FCF metrics to better assess the company's valuation, as these ratios normalize for the capital-intensive nature of the mining business model. Relying solely on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's value, particularly during periods of heavy investment where earnings are artificially suppressed by accounting charges.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EGO stock.
Eldorado Gold Corporation's current P/E ratio is 12.8x. The historical average is 29.8x. This places it at the 8th percentile of its historical range.
Eldorado Gold Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 6.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.8x.
Eldorado Gold Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 12.6%. The historical average is -6.1%.
Based on historical data, Eldorado Gold Corporation is trading at a P/E of 12.8x. This is at the 8th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Eldorado Gold Corporation has 44.9% gross margin and 41.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Eldorado Gold Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.2x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.