Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.9x · EV/EBITDA 136.6x · ROE -28.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $34M | $37M | $162M | $275M | $477M | $302M | $41M | $55M | $127M | $127M | $176M |
| Enterprise Value | $220M | $222M | $335M | $402M | $569M | $442M | $276M | $328M | $179M | $181M | $233M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.94 | — | 54.40 | 9.93 | 5.36 | 5.35 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 0.87 | 0.60 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.39 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.31 | 0.34 | 1.15 | 1.84 | 3.48 | 5.19 | — | 0.95 | 2.16 | 1.82 | 1.99 |
| P/FCF | 18.51 | 19.78 | 87.14 | 8.53 | 9.48 | 4.30 | — | 23.08 | 45.63 | 15.14 | 30.74 |
| P/OCF | 1.16 | 1.24 | 5.48 | 5.54 | 7.96 | 4.00 | — | 3.51 | 8.06 | 4.11 | 5.03 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 1.04 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.69 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | 136.56 | 138.02 | 19.01 | 7.20 | 7.69 | 5.58 | — | 13.96 | 9.64 | 13.90 | 7.48 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 66.49 | 9.55 | 9.74 | 7.41 | — | — | — | — | 238.90 |
| EV / FCF | — | 119.47 | 180.00 | 12.48 | 11.31 | 6.29 | — | 136.64 | 64.26 | 21.59 | 40.80 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 39.9% | 46.5% | 48.4% | 49.9% | 49.5% | 32.9% | 43.1% | 44.6% | 45.0% | 45.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | -3.2% | 0.8% | 8.0% | 10.7% | 12.3% | -19.0% | -0.2% | -2.1% | -3.9% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.3% | -8.3% | 0.7% | 5.3% | 16.3% | 11.2% | -20.2% | -1.6% | -2.9% | -4.0% | -0.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -28.8% | -28.8% | 2.1% | 19.5% | 91.2% | 209.5% | -237.5% | -13.3% | -21.0% | -23.8% | -2.6% |
| ROA | -9.6% | -9.6% | 0.8% | 7.9% | 28.3% | 19.3% | -18.5% | -2.5% | -5.8% | -7.4% | -0.8% |
| ROIC | -3.4% | -3.4% | 0.9% | 12.5% | 20.5% | 21.7% | -16.1% | -0.3% | -6.5% | -10.0% | 0.5% |
| ROCE | -4.8% | -4.8% | 1.3% | 16.2% | 27.0% | 36.9% | -29.4% | -0.5% | -8.1% | -12.7% | 0.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.31 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 2.67 | — | 4.75 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.71 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 129.95 | 129.95 | 10.48 | 2.77 | 1.95 | 1.96 | — | 11.78 | 3.06 | 4.56 | 2.02 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.72 | 1.22 | 0.85 | 0.67 | 2.41 | — | 4.67 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.65 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 115.17 | 115.17 | 9.81 | 2.28 | 1.25 | 1.77 | — | 11.60 | 2.79 | 4.15 | 1.84 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 99.69 | 92.86 | 3.95 | 1.83 | 1.99 | — | 113.56 | 18.63 | 6.44 | 10.06 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | 232.78 | 13.71 | -15.45 | -1.33 | -2.92 | -5.37 | 0.32 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.45 | 1.71 | 1.51 | 1.11 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 1.18 | 1.11 | 1.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.19 | 1.23 | 1.46 | 1.56 | 1.80 | 1.04 | 1.21 | 2.10 | 1.95 | 1.67 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.55 | 3.55 | 3.31 | 3.33 | 2.94 | 3.12 | 2.52 | 2.63 | 2.46 | 2.49 | 2.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1.56 | 1.27 | 2.74 | 1.15 | 1.52 | 7.34 | 4.79 | 3.41 | 2.38 | 5.77 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 1.8% | 10.1% | 18.7% | 18.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.4% | 5.1% | 1.1% | 11.7% | 10.5% | 23.3% | — | 4.3% | 2.2% | 6.6% | 3.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.3% | 8.5% | 8.9% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 3.7% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.3% | 8.5% | 8.9% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 3.7% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $54M | $60M | $64M | $67M | $68M | $51M | $50M | $49M | $49M | $50M |
Negative operating leverage
According to current market data, DXLG trades at a P/S ratio of 0.08 and a P/B of 0.32, suggesting that investors are pricing the company as a distressed asset rather than a specialty retailer with a durable competitive moat in the Big & Tall apparel segment.
The extremely low P/S multiple indicates that the market has largely discounted the company's revenue-generating potential, likely due to the persistent top-line contraction. Investors should monitor whether this valuation floor holds as the company attempts to navigate its transition away from legacy store formats.
Based on reported financial figures, DXLG's ROIC has deteriorated from a positive 2.1% in 2023Q4 to -1.2% in 2026Q1, signaling that the company is currently failing to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital while investing in its physical store footprint.
This downward trend in return on capital suggests that the capital-intensive strategy of maintaining large-format stores is not yielding the expected incremental profitability. The erosion of ROIC appears to be driven by both margin compression and an inability to optimize asset turnover in a softening retail environment.
As reported in recent financial statements, the Cash Conversion Cycle has fluctuated significantly, reaching 77 days in 2026Q1, which reflects the inherent difficulty of managing inventory turnover for a specialized product range that requires deep sizing across a vast number of unique stock-keeping units.
The volatility in DIO, which peaked at 129 days in 2024Q3, suggests that the company may be struggling with inventory obsolescence risks associated with extreme sizes. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a structural challenge that limits the company's ability to free up cash during periods of declining demand.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, DXLG's debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to 2.08 as of 2026Q1, indicating that the company is increasingly relying on debt to bridge the gap created by persistent operating losses and ongoing capital expenditures for store renovations.
While the company has historically maintained a conservative debt profile, the recent surge in leverage relative to equity suggests a weakening balance sheet position. Investors should monitor whether this trend limits the firm's financial flexibility, particularly if the current negative operating margin environment persists.
The market frequently misapplies standard P/E multiples to DXLG, which obscures the company's true financial health because the metric is rendered meaningless by the current negative net income and the significant non-cash charges associated with its large-format store lease obligations.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/Sales or adjusted EBITDA metrics that account for the capitalized value of operating leases, as these provide a more accurate picture of the company's enterprise value. Relying on P/E ratios in this context may lead to a fundamental misunderstanding of the company's turnaround potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DXLG stock.
Destination XL Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.9x. The historical average is 27.0x.
Destination XL Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 136.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.6x.
Destination XL Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -28.8%. The historical average is -6.9%.
Based on historical data, Destination XL Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Destination XL Group, Inc. has 39.9% gross margin and -3.2% operating margin.
Destination XL Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 130.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.