Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -14.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -38.7%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $174M | $172M | $46M | $21M | $12M | $19M | $14M | $12M | $10M | $2M | $999654 |
| Enterprise Value | $163M | $161M | $49M | $24M | $17M | $23M | $12M | $13M | $9M | $138031 | $3M |
| P/E Ratio → | -14.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 6.44 | 6.36 | 6.35 | 2.80 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.75 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.50 | 0.16 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.99 | 3.54 | 20.46 | 3.89 | 3.05 | 24.25 | 7.47 | — | — | 3.13 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.96 | 6.67 | 3.15 | 1.10 | 2.82 | 1.49 | 0.98 | 0.77 | 0.04 | 0.48 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.3% | 29.3% | 6.4% | 17.5% | 31.6% | 24.7% | 2.9% | 47.5% | 43.2% | 40.9% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | -36.1% | -36.1% | -150.9% | -153.2% | -45.7% | -90.3% | -82.5% | -17.6% | -13.0% | -88.6% | -28.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -36.4% | -36.4% | -147.8% | -150.5% | -45.7% | -72.7% | -83.9% | -18.1% | -13.1% | -132.6% | -42.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -38.7% | -38.7% | -282.2% | -238.8% | -284.1% | -450.9% | -768.3% | — | -700.2% | -827.7% | — |
| ROA | -20.0% | -20.0% | -45.0% | -86.7% | -60.8% | -75.6% | -113.0% | -49.3% | -43.0% | -255.8% | -207.4% |
| ROIC | -34.7% | -34.7% | -131.8% | -105.7% | -77.0% | -230.1% | -879.2% | -5340.2% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -27.4% | -27.4% | -77.2% | -125.9% | -97.1% | -179.4% | -452.2% | -1462.5% | -639.9% | -520.4% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 3.77 | 0.94 | 1.32 | 6.67 | 0.98 | — | — | 0.21 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.22 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 1.04 | 5.52 | -1.13 | — | — | -2.91 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -22.23 | -22.23 | -36.62 | -1569.29 | -745.90 | -295.47 | -43.94 | -34.64 | -91.02 | -0.14 | -3.56 |
Net cash position: cash ($15M) exceeds total debt ($5M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | 2.08 | 0.50 | 1.93 | 1.52 | 0.83 | 1.60 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 1.25 | 0.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.05 | 2.05 | 0.47 | 1.46 | 1.20 | 0.76 | 1.57 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 1.25 | 0.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.39 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 1.09 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.88 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.43 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 1.15 | 0.87 | 1.26 | 2.47 | 2.68 | 1.36 | 5.25 |
| Inventory Turnover | 62.41 | 62.41 | 11.25 | 4.04 | 7.19 | 20.85 | 69.41 | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 92.00 | 52.10 | 102.81 | 93.46 | 76.98 | 61.17 | 106.69 | 83.23 | 67.85 | 43.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.4% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 14.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 16.4% | 14.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $15M | $8M | $7M | $6M | $4M | $3M | $2M | $1M | $257601 | $134543 |
High customer concentration dependency
Based on reported figures, the company trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 7.77, which appears disconnected from its negative operating margins and suggests that investors are pricing in a successful transition to a high-margin software model that has yet to materialize in the financial statements.
The forward P/E of 7.80 implies an expectation of rapid earnings inflection, yet this valuation remains speculative given the historical volatility of project-based revenue. Investors should monitor whether the current premium is justified by backlog conversion or if it reflects an over-optimistic assessment of the company's ability to scale its AI platform.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -4.7% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its heavy investments in railcar inspection hardware and proprietary AI development.
The persistent negative returns on invested capital suggest that the cost of deploying physical assets significantly outweighs the incremental profit generated by the software layer. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company can achieve a positive ROIC without a fundamental shift in its capital-intensive deployment strategy.
According to recent SEC filings, the cash conversion cycle has exhibited extreme volatility, swinging from 259 days in 2024Q1 to -123 days in 2026Q1, reflecting the inherent difficulty in managing receivables and payables within a business model dominated by lumpy, project-based rail infrastructure installations.
The erratic nature of the CCC suggests that the company lacks consistent leverage over its suppliers or customers, making liquidity planning highly unpredictable. Analysts should view these fluctuations as a sign of operational friction rather than improved working capital management, as the negative cycle may be driven by timing differences in milestone payments.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the current ratio of 3.40 in 2026Q1 provides a superficial appearance of strength, yet this liquidity is heavily dependent on the timing of project-based cash inflows and does not account for the ongoing cash burn required to sustain operations.
While the current ratio appears adequate compared to historical lows, the company's reliance on external financing to bridge operational gaps remains a critical vulnerability. Investors should monitor the quick ratio closely, as any delay in customer acceptance certificates could rapidly erode the firm's ability to meet its short-term obligations.
The P/S ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model, as it fails to distinguish between low-margin hardware pass-through revenue and high-margin AI subscription income, thereby masking the true earning power of the company's proprietary software platform.
Analysts should instead focus on the ratio of software-to-hardware revenue and the gross margin expansion, as these metrics provide a clearer picture of the company's transition toward a sustainable SaaS profile. Relying on top-line multiples in a business undergoing such a structural pivot may lead to a significant mispricing of the underlying software value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DUOT stock.
Duos Technologies Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -14.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Duos Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -38.7%. The historical average is -211.5%.
Based on historical data, Duos Technologies Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -14.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Duos Technologies Group, Inc. has 29.3% gross margin and -36.1% operating margin.