Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -62.7%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $119M | $53M | $26M | $42M | $105M | $434M | $434M | $583M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $37M | $-28658516 | $-29626299 | $-43346615 | $-60016821 | $300M | $355M | $402M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.55 | — | 3.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.46 | 1.56 | 0.38 | 0.86 | 4.17 | 3.76 | 17.87 | 26.23 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.29 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 2.23 | 1.73 | 4.76 | 9.77 | 4.22 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.84 | -0.43 | -0.89 | -2.39 | 2.59 | 14.60 | 18.10 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | -3.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 92.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -152.2% | -152.2% | -38.1% | -89.8% | -248.3% | -34.1% | -452.2% | -392.1% | -440.2% | -338.9% | -125.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -136.0% | -136.0% | 10.4% | -125.8% | -444.8% | -26.5% | -448.9% | -417.6% | -423.0% | -325.4% | -117.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -62.7% | -62.7% | 19.0% | -154.7% | -147.3% | -45.1% | -119.3% | -104.2% | -677.5% | — | — |
| ROA | -32.1% | -32.1% | 4.8% | -30.8% | -49.7% | -16.9% | -56.6% | -49.7% | -43.6% | -24.7% | -8.4% |
| ROIC | -726.2% | -726.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -39.1% | -39.1% | -22.6% | -30.3% | -35.2% | -27.8% | -69.6% | -52.4% | -51.0% | -28.6% | -9.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 1.66 | 0.41 | 0.10 | 0.24 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.89 | -0.99 | -4.53 | -2.72 | -1.48 | -1.78 | -1.31 | -2.58 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.04 |
| Interest Coverage | -36.67 | -36.67 | 5.02 | -18.07 | -64.62 | -230.83 | — | -509.31 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($111M) exceeds total debt ($29M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 13.32 | 13.32 | 6.34 | 2.73 | 3.34 | 4.50 | 2.46 | 7.19 | 8.22 | 6.99 | 11.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 13.32 | 13.32 | 6.34 | 2.73 | 3.34 | 4.50 | 2.46 | 7.19 | 8.22 | 6.99 | 11.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 12.97 | 12.97 | 5.76 | 2.33 | 3.18 | 3.99 | 2.10 | 6.72 | 7.33 | 6.82 | 11.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 0.50 | 0.30 | 0.11 | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 9.02 | 95.87 | 10.47 | 1.54 | 150.30 | 15.84 | 17.54 | 1.24 | 20.08 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $7M | $4M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $1M | $2M | $1M | $17M |
Milestone-dependent liquidity constraints
According to recent market data, DTIL trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 2.73, which appears to discount the company's historical revenue volatility and the speculative nature of its ARCUS platform compared to more established gene-editing peers that command significantly higher market capitalizations despite similar clinical-stage risks.
The current P/S multiple suggests that investors are pricing the company primarily on its remaining cash runway rather than a predictable growth trajectory. Given the absence of a forward P/E or meaningful EBITDA, the valuation remains highly sensitive to the timing of future licensing milestones and the perceived probability of success for the HBV program.
As reported in financial statements, DTIL's return on invested capital has exhibited extreme volatility, swinging from a positive 168.6% in 2025Q4 to negative 14.4% in 2025Q3, which highlights the structural difficulty of compounding returns in a business model entirely dependent on lumpy, non-recurring collaboration milestone payments.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the company is not currently generating sustainable value from its invested capital. Investors should monitor whether the pivot to in vivo applications can eventually stabilize these returns by reducing the reliance on high-cost, internal oncology programs that previously failed to deliver consistent capital efficiency.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's asset turnover remains exceptionally low, often near zero, which reflects the lack of commercial product sales and the reliance on research-based collaboration agreements that do not utilize traditional inventory or receivables cycles to drive operational efficiency.
The lack of a meaningful cash conversion cycle indicates that DTIL's operational focus is entirely on R&D throughput rather than working capital optimization. The significant fluctuations in DSO, which reached 2641 in 2025Q1, suggest that the timing of partner payments is the primary driver of balance sheet liquidity rather than internal process improvements.
As indicated by the company's latest balance sheet, the current ratio of 14.02 provides a superficial appearance of liquidity, yet this is largely an artifact of the company's low liability base rather than a robust ability to fund long-term clinical trials without future capital market access.
While the current and quick ratios appear healthy, they do not account for the high, fixed burn rate associated with the ARCUS platform's clinical development. The company's liquidity position remains vulnerable to any delays in milestone-driven inflows, which could necessitate dilutive equity raises to maintain operations.
Analysts frequently misapply gross margin to DTIL, citing the 91.97% figure as evidence of operational strength, when in reality, this metric is a structural artifact of the licensing model that obscures the underlying cash burn and the lack of a scalable, commercialized manufacturing process for its gene-editing therapies.
Using gross margin to evaluate this business model is misleading because it ignores the massive R&D expenditures required to maintain the platform's competitive edge. A more appropriate metric for assessing the company's health would be the quarterly cash burn rate relative to the remaining cash and equivalents, which provides a clearer picture of the company's survival horizon.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DTIL stock.
Precision BioSciences, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.5x. The historical average is 3.7x.
Precision BioSciences, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -62.7%. The historical average is -87.7%.
Based on historical data, Precision BioSciences, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Precision BioSciences, Inc. has 92.0% gross margin and -152.2% operating margin.