Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.4x · EV/EBITDA 6.0x · ROE 16.2%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.6B | $9.2B | $10.0B | $10.0B | $9.7B | $9.7B | $7.6B | $9.1B | $9.5B | $9.5B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.1B | $9.7B | $10.4B | $10.3B | $9.9B | $9.9B | $7.7B | $8.6B | $9.1B | $8.8B | $8.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.35 | 16.25 | 20.58 | 18.82 | 17.89 | 14.23 | 15.47 | 19.05 | 26.71 | 21.73 | 21.35 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.24 | 2.02 | 1.99 | 2.05 | 2.12 | 2.26 | 1.83 | 2.22 | 2.39 | 2.45 | 2.35 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.68 | 2.64 | 2.85 | 2.81 | 2.72 | 2.67 | 2.09 | 2.56 | 2.72 | 2.65 | 2.53 |
| P/FCF | 8.72 | 14.21 | 16.11 | 14.34 | 18.29 | 13.54 | 16.90 | 17.16 | 29.08 | 18.86 | 17.84 |
| P/OCF | 7.51 | 12.24 | 13.76 | 12.17 | 12.80 | 10.46 | 11.62 | 13.82 | 17.01 | 14.91 | 14.10 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.13 | 2.08 | 2.11 | 2.17 | 2.30 | 1.85 | 2.10 | 2.28 | 2.28 | 2.20 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.01 | 9.49 | 12.67 | 12.12 | 11.17 | 12.21 | 9.71 | 11.08 | 14.17 | 12.06 | 11.77 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.44 | 13.22 | 16.63 | 15.62 | 14.94 | 11.80 | 12.97 | 15.03 | 21.36 | 17.17 | 16.81 |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.99 | 16.82 | 14.75 | 18.77 | 13.78 | 17.01 | 16.27 | 27.79 | 17.57 | 16.68 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 36.6% | 35.1% | 35.3% | 35.4% | 34.5% | 33.9% | 35.1% | 34.7% | 35.2% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.2% | 18.2% | 12.6% | 13.4% | 14.5% | 14.0% | 14.3% | 13.9% | 10.8% | 13.4% | 13.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.5% | 12.5% | 9.9% | 11.1% | 12.0% | 16.1% | 11.9% | 11.7% | 8.9% | 11.3% | 11.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.2% | 16.2% | 14.0% | 15.2% | 15.3% | 18.9% | 13.8% | 13.6% | 10.0% | 12.4% | 11.9% |
| ROA | 8.9% | 8.9% | 7.7% | 8.4% | 8.5% | 10.7% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 6.7% | 8.2% | 7.7% |
| ROIC | 15.6% | 15.6% | 12.1% | 12.8% | 13.1% | 11.9% | 13.1% | 13.9% | 10.7% | 13.4% | 13.2% |
| ROCE | 16.8% | 16.8% | 12.6% | 12.8% | 12.9% | 11.6% | 12.9% | 14.0% | 10.5% | 12.8% | 12.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.28 | — | — | — | 0.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 1.09 | 1.30 | — | — | — | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.01 | -0.13 | -0.12 | -0.18 | -0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.06 | -0.61 | -0.65 | -0.89 | -0.82 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.11 | -0.89 | -1.28 | -1.29 | -1.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 17.24 | 17.24 | 17.94 | 28.56 | 39.34 | 39.28 | 56.94 | 146.20 | 153.51 | 321.57 | 291.76 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.20 | 1.41 | 1.60 | 1.59 | 1.71 | 1.39 | 1.33 | 1.75 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.20 | 1.41 | 1.60 | 1.59 | 1.71 | 1.39 | 1.33 | 1.75 | 1.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 75.35 | 75.00 | 70.53 | 75.51 | 73.77 | 75.38 | 88.23 | 89.21 | 81.65 | 80.35 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.8% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 39.7% | 39.7% | 43.0% | 36.9% | 33.9% | 25.8% | 33.0% | 30.8% | 37.9% | 27.8% | 26.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.7% | 6.2% | 4.9% | 5.3% | 5.6% | 7.0% | 6.5% | 5.2% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| FCF Yield | 11.5% | 7.0% | 6.2% | 7.0% | 5.5% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 5.8% | 3.4% | 5.3% | 5.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 9.8% | 6.0% | 5.6% | 4.9% | 5.3% | 7.0% | 4.7% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 4.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 13.6% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 7.2% | 8.9% | 6.9% | 6.0% | 5.8% | 4.9% | 6.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $112M | $114M | $118M | $122M | $128M | $133M | $137M | $144M | $147M | $151M |
Carrier Capex Concentration Risk
According to current market data, DOX trades at a forward P/E of 7.01, which appears to discount the firm's recent revenue contraction and suggests that investors are pricing in a prolonged period of stagnant growth rather than a recovery in carrier-led digital transformation spending cycles.
The current valuation multiple sits at a significant discount to broader software peers, reflecting the market's skepticism regarding the company's ability to return to historical growth rates. This pricing suggests that the market views DOX as a mature, low-growth utility-like provider rather than a high-growth software entity, warranting caution regarding potential multiple expansion.
Based on reported financial statements, the company's ROIC has hovered in the 3% to 4% range over the last ten quarters, indicating that the firm is struggling to generate returns on invested capital that meaningfully exceed its cost of capital in the current environment.
The persistent low ROIC is a direct consequence of the company's services-heavy business model, which requires significant human capital and infrastructure investment. Investors should monitor whether management can improve these returns through a shift toward more standardized, cloud-native software modules that require less labor-intensive implementation.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's DSO has remained elevated near 73 days, suggesting that the firm's cash conversion cycle is heavily dependent on the payment terms of a few large telecommunications carriers, which introduces significant volatility into its quarterly cash flow generation.
The lack of improvement in DSO indicates that the company possesses limited leverage over its primary customers when it comes to accelerating cash collections. This reliance on large-scale, long-term contracts creates a structural bottleneck where cash flow is frequently tied to the milestone-based billing cycles of its clients.
According to the latest balance sheet data, the company maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.31, which, as noted in recent financial disclosures, provides a robust defensive buffer that allows the firm to navigate cyclical downturns without the immediate pressure of significant interest obligations.
The low leverage profile is a key strength that distinguishes DOX from more capital-intensive peers, offering management the flexibility to pursue strategic acquisitions or maintain shareholder returns during periods of revenue contraction. This financial discipline appears to be a core component of the company's long-term risk mitigation strategy.
Investors frequently misapply pure-play SaaS valuation multiples to DOX, which obscures the reality that the firm's revenue is heavily weighted toward lower-margin managed services rather than high-margin, scalable software subscriptions, leading to an inaccurate assessment of the company's true earnings power and growth potential.
Using EV/Sales or P/E ratios typical of high-growth SaaS firms fails to account for the labor-intensive nature of DOX's delivery model. A more appropriate analytical framework would involve evaluating the firm against IT services and infrastructure peers, focusing on free cash flow yield rather than top-line growth multiples.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DOX stock.
Amdocs Limited's current P/E ratio is 10.4x. The historical average is 24.3x.
Amdocs Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 6.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.4x.
Amdocs Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 16.2%. The historical average is 20.9%.
Based on historical data, Amdocs Limited is trading at a P/E of 10.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Amdocs Limited's current dividend yield is 3.84% with a payout ratio of 39.7%.
Amdocs Limited has 36.6% gross margin and 18.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Amdocs Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.