Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -143.6%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $99M | $93M | $7M | $9M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $221M | $215M | $4M | $4M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 8.73 | 8.18 | 3.23 | 4.36 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.61 | 0.94 | 1.93 | 1.50 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 18.86 | 2.03 | 1.86 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 97.8% | 97.8% | 98.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -67.0% | -67.0% | -143.0% | -170.0% | -80.0% | -53.3% | 25.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -648.1% | -648.1% | -129.9% | -168.4% | -58.7% | -81.6% | 20.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -143.6% | -143.6% | -58.5% | -106.4% | -267.1% | -1134.3% | — |
| ROA | -47.3% | -47.3% | -49.3% | -84.1% | -79.0% | -124.5% | 43.1% |
| ROIC | -5.2% | -5.2% | -249.5% | -1101.1% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -6.6% | -6.6% | -61.3% | -95.4% | -118.3% | -84.9% | 55.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.21 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.22 | -0.71 | -0.86 | -1.65 | -4.07 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -25.93 | -1.20 |
| Interest Coverage | -7.26 | -7.26 | — | — | — | -10108.59 | 4.40 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 5.52 | 7.84 | 5.01 | 22.26 | 24.62 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 5.52 | 7.84 | 5.01 | 22.26 | 24.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 4.82 | 7.52 | 4.79 | 20.65 | 14.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 1.61 | 1.07 | 2.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1.67 | 33.97 | 15.70 | 6.50 | 24.03 | 70.16 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 165.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 87.7% | 93.5% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 87.7% | 93.5% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $10M | $7M | $9M | $9M | $9M |
Treasury-linked liquidity volatility
Based on current market data, DFDV trades at a 7.22x price-to-sales multiple, a valuation that appears to prioritize the company's crypto-treasury exposure and explosive 442% revenue growth over the underlying software business's negative net margins and significant operational cash burn.
The P/S multiple suggests investors are pricing the firm as a high-beta proxy for the Solana ecosystem rather than a traditional SaaS entity. This valuation disconnect warrants caution, as the lack of a positive P/E or FCF multiple makes it difficult to anchor the stock price to fundamental software performance metrics.
As reported in historical financial data, DFDV's ROIC has experienced extreme volatility, collapsing from a peak of 25.8% in 2025Q2 to -1.8% in 2026Q1, which suggests that recent capital deployment is failing to generate productive returns relative to the firm's cost of capital.
The sharp decline in return on invested capital indicates that the company's aggressive scaling efforts are currently dilutive to shareholder value. Investors should monitor whether this trend is a temporary byproduct of heavy R&D investment or a structural inability to achieve profitable growth at scale.
According to the latest quarterly filings, DFDV's asset turnover remains exceptionally low at 0.01, indicating that the company's massive asset base is not yet effectively driving revenue, a trend that contrasts sharply with the high-velocity nature of its core AI-driven software platform.
The extremely low asset turnover suggests that a significant portion of the balance sheet is tied up in non-operational assets, likely the crypto-treasury holdings. This inefficiency obscures the true operational leverage of the software business and complicates standard benchmarking against traditional infrastructure software peers.
Based on recent financial statements, DFDV's debt-to-equity ratio has surged to 12.53 in 2026Q1 from near-zero levels in previous periods, indicating a rapid shift toward a highly leveraged capital structure that may increase the firm's sensitivity to interest rate volatility and credit market tightening.
This dramatic increase in leverage, combined with negative interest coverage, suggests that the company's debt service capacity is becoming increasingly strained. The reliance on debt to fund operations in a high-burn environment warrants close investigation into the terms and covenants of these obligations.
The most commonly misapplied metric for DFDV is the price-to-sales ratio, which fails to account for the distortive impact of the company's crypto-treasury holdings on the balance sheet and the non-recurring nature of its current revenue growth trajectory.
Using standard SaaS valuation multiples ignores the fact that DFDV functions as a hybrid entity where treasury performance often outweighs software subscription revenue. Analysts should instead focus on 'Core Software Revenue' excluding treasury-related gains and losses to better assess the underlying viability of the AI platform.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DFDV stock.
DeFi Development Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -0.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
DeFi Development Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -143.6%. The historical average is -143.9%.
Based on historical data, DeFi Development Corp. is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
DeFi Development Corp. has 97.8% gross margin and -67.0% operating margin.