Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -15325.8%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | $9M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4M | $11M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.42 | 1.60 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 6.89 | 38.64 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.84 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 45.4% | -99.2% | 80.2% | 74.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -159.4% | -159.4% | -778.9% | -381.4% | -142.1% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -632.8% | -632.8% | -1179.2% | -441.3% | -163.6% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -15325.8% | -15325.8% | — | — | -0.7% | -0.1% |
| ROA | -423.9% | -423.9% | -49.0% | -134.3% | -0.6% | -0.1% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | -0.4% | — |
| ROCE | -568.4% | -568.4% | -115.0% | -120.0% | -0.5% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 9.43 | 9.43 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 5.82 | — | — | — | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -22.86 | -22.86 | -4.75 | — | -108.96 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.07 | 17.38 | 18.64 | 2.93 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.07 | 17.38 | 18.64 | 2.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 13.73 | 16.39 | 1.75 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.50 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 100.0% | 54.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 100.0% | 54.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $824720 | $4M | $993080 | $993080 | $2M |
Imminent liquidity exhaustion
As reported in recent financial filings, DAIC trades at a P/B of 5.54, a valuation that appears disconnected from the firm's negative tangible book value per share of -5.83 recorded in 2026Q1, suggesting the market may be pricing in speculative growth rather than fundamental asset backing.
The elevated P/B ratio relative to the firm's negative equity position indicates that investors are likely valuing the company as a high-growth technology option rather than a traditional depository institution. This valuation disconnect warrants caution, as the lack of positive tangible equity suggests that the market price is not supported by the underlying balance sheet strength.
Based on the company's reported figures, the ROE has remained consistently negative, with a -9.8% reading in 2025Q4, highlighting a fundamental inability to generate returns on equity while the firm continues to burn through its remaining capital base to fund ongoing operations.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the firm's profitability is severely hampered by an inability to achieve positive asset utilization or maintain a stable net interest margin. The persistent negative returns suggest that the current business model is not yet capable of covering its fixed cost base, leading to a continuous erosion of shareholder value.
According to the provided financial statements, the efficiency ratio reached an unsustainable 322.7% in 2026Q1, indicating that non-interest expenses are vastly exceeding total revenue and highlighting a severe lack of operating leverage inherent in the firm's current business model and cost structure.
The extreme volatility in the efficiency ratio, swinging from 5.5% in 2025Q3 to over 300% in 2026Q1, suggests that the firm lacks a predictable cost-to-income relationship. This lack of control over operating expenses implies that any future revenue growth may be insufficient to reach profitability without a radical restructuring of the cost base.
As indicated by the financial statements, the equity-to-total-assets ratio plummeted to -0.53 in 2026Q1, reflecting a severe depletion of the capital base that leaves the firm with virtually no buffer against further operational losses or unexpected credit events.
The transition to negative equity is a critical warning sign for institutional analysts, as it indicates that the firm's liabilities now exceed its assets. This capital position appears highly vulnerable and suggests that the company may be forced to seek dilutive financing to maintain even minimal regulatory or operational capital requirements.
The P/B ratio is frequently misapplied to DAIC, as it fails to account for the firm's negative tangible book value, which obscures the reality that the company is currently operating with a deficit in its core capital base.
Investors should prioritize the tangible book value per share over the P/B ratio, as the latter becomes mathematically distorted when equity turns negative. Relying on P/B in this context may lead to an overestimation of the firm's intrinsic value, as it ignores the urgent need for capital replenishment to address the current balance sheet insolvency.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DAIC stock.
CID HoldCo, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
CID HoldCo, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -15325.8%. The historical average is -0.4%.
Based on historical data, CID HoldCo, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CID HoldCo, Inc. has 45.4% gross margin and -159.4% operating margin.