Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -12.5x · EV/EBITDA 9.1x · ROE -12.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.2B | $4.9B | $7.2B | $10.1B | $8.9B | $19.7B | $9.7B | $1.1B | $530M | $862M | $831M |
| Enterprise Value | $31.6B | $30.3B | $31.4B | $34.2B | $33.3B | $44.9B | $34.8B | $4.6B | $4.5B | $2.9B | $1.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | -12.54 | — | — | 12.88 | — | — | — | 13.20 | 5.57 | 11.71 | 34.00 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 2.06 | 2.66 | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.58 | 0.92 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.71 | 1.32 | 1.64 | 2.15 | 2.37 | 4.35 | 1.92 | 0.96 | 0.51 | 0.91 | 2.78 |
| P/FCF | 11.89 | 9.36 | — | 18.58 | 387.06 | 30.27 | — | 7.54 | 3.02 | 18.48 | 17.56 |
| P/OCF | 4.67 | 3.67 | 6.45 | 5.60 | 9.13 | 16.84 | — | 3.42 | 1.64 | 6.64 | 8.77 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.64 | 2.79 | 2.97 | 3.08 | 4.69 | 9.60 | 1.82 | 2.20 | 1.98 | 1.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.05 | 8.68 | 8.65 | 9.16 | 11.31 | 17.37 | 174.15 | 7.25 | 9.67 | 14.53 | 10.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.23 | 14.59 | 13.93 | 14.91 | 19.45 | 43.12 | — | 11.19 | 14.72 | 51.74 | 17.74 |
| EV / FCF | — | 58.31 | — | 62.74 | 1447.45 | 68.91 | — | 32.45 | 25.80 | 62.57 | 33.18 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 37.7% | 51.8% | 53.2% | 50.1% | 51.4% | 49.1% | 49.0% | 45.0% | 45.2% | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 18.1% | 20.5% | 21.4% | 16.1% | 15.3% | -10.6% | 16.2% | 15.1% | 6.4% | 9.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -4.4% | -4.4% | -2.5% | 6.8% | -8.3% | -10.6% | -48.4% | 3.2% | 4.6% | 5.0% | 2.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -12.5% | -12.5% | -6.1% | 18.6% | -21.7% | -21.3% | -57.1% | 7.5% | 9.6% | 11.8% | 8.6% |
| ROA | -1.6% | -1.6% | -0.8% | 2.4% | -2.5% | -2.7% | -8.4% | 1.4% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 1.9% |
| ROIC | 5.4% | 5.4% | 6.0% | 6.5% | 4.5% | 3.7% | -1.6% | 6.4% | 5.8% | 3.5% | 6.3% |
| ROCE | 7.0% | 7.0% | 7.6% | 8.0% | 5.5% | 4.4% | -2.0% | 7.8% | 7.0% | 4.2% | 7.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 7.15 | 7.15 | 5.73 | 5.31 | 6.78 | 5.78 | 5.35 | 3.35 | 4.10 | 2.32 | 2.68 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.54 | 7.54 | 6.91 | 6.72 | 8.64 | 10.16 | 134.66 | 5.89 | 9.03 | 10.91 | 5.26 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 6.91 | 5.53 | 5.10 | 6.50 | 5.55 | 5.00 | 3.16 | 3.88 | 2.17 | 2.48 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.28 | 7.28 | 6.67 | 6.45 | 8.28 | 9.74 | 125.87 | 5.57 | 8.54 | 10.24 | 4.86 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 48.96 | — | 44.16 | 1060.39 | 38.64 | — | 24.91 | 22.78 | 44.09 | 15.62 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.75 | 0.45 | -0.34 | 1.44 | 1.79 | 0.57 | 1.74 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 1.13 | 2.41 | 0.88 | 1.43 | 1.12 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 1.12 | 2.40 | 0.85 | 1.37 | 1.05 | 0.89 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.20 | 0.71 | 0.35 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.70 |
| Inventory Turnover | 166.51 | 166.51 | 120.42 | 117.28 | 91.54 | 110.64 | 41.95 | 71.61 | 54.92 | 47.83 | 49.46 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 15.13 | 15.26 | 19.25 | 20.61 | 18.00 | 38.83 | 7.80 | 13.53 | 12.59 | 5.96 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 7.8% | — | — | — | 7.6% | 18.0% | 8.5% | 2.9% |
| FCF Yield | 8.4% | 10.7% | — | 5.4% | 0.3% | 3.3% | — | 13.3% | 33.1% | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.7% | 4.7% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.7% | 4.7% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $208M | $215M | $216M | $214M | $211M | $130M | $79M | $78M | $68M | $98M |
High Debt Service Burden
Based on current market data, CZR trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of 9.04, which appears to incorporate a significant discount relative to peers like MGM, likely reflecting investor apprehension regarding the company's elevated debt load and the persistent volatility in its quarterly net income performance.
The current valuation suggests the market is pricing in a risk premium for the company's high leverage rather than its underlying asset quality. Investors should monitor whether the forward EV/EBITDA of 7.34 indicates an expectation of margin expansion or simply a reflection of the market's skepticism toward the company's ability to deleverage in the current interest rate environment.
According to recent financial statements, CZR's ROIC has hovered near 1.3% to 1.7% over the last ten quarters, a level that suggests the company is struggling to generate returns on invested capital that meaningfully exceed its cost of capital, thereby limiting long-term value creation for shareholders.
The persistent low ROIC indicates that the capital-intensive nature of the resort portfolio, combined with the heavy debt burden, is suppressing the company's ability to compound returns. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current reinvestment strategy is effectively driving incremental growth or merely maintaining the existing asset base.
As reported in quarterly filings, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at 0.09, highlighting the difficulty in extracting higher revenue productivity from its extensive physical footprint, while the cash conversion cycle remains erratic due to timing differences in payables and inventory management across properties.
The low asset turnover suggests that the company's revenue generation is not keeping pace with its massive property base, which may be a structural limitation of the regional gaming model. Investors should monitor whether management can optimize the hub-and-spoke network to improve throughput without incurring additional, margin-dilutive capital expenditures.
Based on the provided balance sheet data, the current ratio has consistently remained below 1.0, reaching 0.85 in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company maintains a limited liquidity buffer to cover its short-term obligations without relying on external financing or revolving credit facilities during periods of stress.
This liquidity profile suggests that the company is operating with minimal margin for error, particularly given the cyclical nature of the gaming industry. The reliance on external financing to manage short-term obligations may expose the company to refinancing risks if credit market conditions tighten unexpectedly.
As noted in industry analysis, the market's heavy reliance on Adjusted EBITDA often obscures the true cash-generating power of CZR, as this metric fails to account for the significant rent expenses associated with gaming REITs and the substantial interest burden stemming from the company's high leverage.
Investors should prioritize EBITDAR or free cash flow metrics to better understand the company's operational reality, as Adjusted EBITDA can provide a misleadingly optimistic view of profitability. Relying solely on EBITDA ignores the structural cash outflows that are essential for maintaining the company's long-term solvency.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CZR stock.
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -12.5x. The historical average is 14.0x.
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.3x.
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -12.5%. The historical average is 1.1%.
Based on historical data, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -12.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. has 37.7% gross margin and 18.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.