Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.4x · EV/EBITDA 12.6x · ROE 12.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.3B | $1.0B | $953M | $785M | $820M | $776M | $658M | $827M | $701M | $831M | $871M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.6B | $1.3B | $904M | $820M | $983M | $807M | $748M | $871M | $851M | $958M | $1.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.40 | 10.41 | 11.50 | 10.06 | 10.03 | 8.83 | 11.06 | 12.81 | 11.82 | 16.13 | 18.37 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.23 | 2.49 | 2.54 | 2.41 | 3.21 | 3.25 | 2.85 | 3.51 | 3.14 | 4.07 | 4.47 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.54 | 1.19 | 1.26 | 1.12 | 1.31 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 1.35 | 1.24 | 1.57 | 1.74 |
| P/FCF | 13.57 | 10.48 | 9.82 | 9.89 | 8.77 | 6.85 | 10.80 | 10.23 | 11.19 | 13.87 | 15.04 |
| P/OCF | 12.59 | 9.72 | 9.06 | 9.16 | 8.22 | 6.71 | 10.55 | 9.91 | 10.71 | 13.34 | 14.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.29 | 2.40 | 2.51 | 3.84 | 3.38 | 3.24 | 3.70 | 3.81 | 4.69 | 5.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.55 | 10.26 | 8.09 | 7.89 | 9.25 | 6.98 | 9.89 | 11.23 | 11.44 | 13.21 | 14.84 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.97 | 10.60 | 8.47 | 8.32 | 9.73 | 7.30 | 10.64 | 12.09 | 12.06 | 13.98 | 15.71 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.84 | 9.31 | 10.33 | 10.51 | 7.12 | 12.28 | 10.76 | 13.58 | 15.97 | 18.03 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 66.7% | 66.7% | 63.2% | 68.6% | 86.9% | 96.4% | 82.0% | 80.8% | 84.1% | 87.4% | 89.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | 31.0% | 28.4% | 30.2% | 39.5% | 46.4% | 30.4% | 30.6% | 31.6% | 33.6% | 34.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 24.0% | 24.0% | 22.0% | 23.9% | 32.0% | 36.9% | 25.8% | 27.4% | 26.5% | 25.2% | 24.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.2% | 12.2% | 11.3% | 11.7% | 12.3% | 13.0% | 9.4% | 10.9% | 10.8% | 10.0% | 9.7% |
| ROA | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| ROIC | 8.2% | 8.2% | 7.7% | 7.7% | 7.7% | 7.8% | 5.3% | 6.1% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.8% |
| ROCE | 13.7% | 13.7% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 13.1% | 14.1% | 9.4% | 10.4% | 11.0% | 11.3% | 10.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.64 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.97 | 2.97 | 2.87 | 2.95 | 2.75 | 2.96 | 5.67 | 3.98 | 3.95 | 4.29 | 4.52 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.38 | -0.07 | 0.05 | 0.26 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.49 | 2.49 | -0.44 | 0.34 | 1.53 | 0.27 | 1.19 | 0.56 | 2.01 | 1.74 | 2.46 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.36 | -0.51 | 0.44 | 1.74 | 0.27 | 1.48 | 0.54 | 2.38 | 2.11 | 2.99 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 1.03 | 3.53 | 7.33 | 2.76 | 1.78 | 2.41 | 3.74 | 4.90 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.7% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.6% | 4.1% | 3.2% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 36.7% | 36.7% | 40.3% | 41.3% | 36.6% | 31.7% | 45.6% | 40.6% | 41.2% | 44.6% | 46.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.5% | 9.6% | 8.7% | 9.9% | 10.0% | 11.3% | 9.0% | 7.8% | 8.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% |
| FCF Yield | 7.4% | 9.5% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 11.4% | 14.6% | 9.3% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 7.2% | 6.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.7% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.6% | 4.3% | 3.2% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M |
Regional economic concentration
Based on reported figures, CTBI trades at a P/B of 1.53, which appears to reflect a premium valuation relative to peers like WesBanco, suggesting that investors may be pricing in the bank's consistent dividend history and the structural durability of its Appalachian trust and wealth management franchise.
The current P/E of 13.33 indicates that the market views CTBI as a stable, utility-like institution rather than a high-growth regional player. This valuation suggests that investors are prioritizing the bank's historical earnings consistency over the potential for rapid asset expansion, which is typical for banks with deep geographic moats.
According to recent financial statements, CTBI's ROE has remained in a narrow 2.6% to 3.2% range, indicating that profitability is primarily driven by stable net interest margins rather than aggressive leverage, as evidenced by the bank's exceptionally low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46% reported in recent filings.
The decomposition of profitability suggests that CTBI's earnings quality is supported by its fee-based trust income, which acts as a non-interest buffer. However, the relatively low ROE compared to peers like First Financial Bancorp may imply that the bank is under-utilizing its balance sheet capacity to drive higher shareholder returns.
As reported in quarterly filings, CTBI maintained an efficiency ratio between 34% and 37%, demonstrating that the bank's cost control measures are effectively insulating its bottom line from the inflationary pressures on non-interest expenses that have impacted many regional banking peers during the current interest rate cycle.
The stability of the NIM at approximately 0.8% to 0.9% suggests that the bank's rural deposit base remains sticky, allowing for effective management of funding costs. This operational efficiency appears to be a core pillar of the bank's ability to maintain profitability despite the inherent cyclicality of its regional loan book.
Based on the provided quarterly data, CTBI maintains a consistent equity-to-assets ratio of 12% to 13%, which, when combined with minimal debt, indicates a fortress-like capital structure that provides a significant buffer against regional economic downturns but may also constrain the bank's potential for aggressive asset growth.
The bank's capital adequacy appears well above regulatory minimums, suggesting that management has significant capacity for capital return or strategic investment. Investors should monitor whether this conservative posture persists, as it may limit the bank's ability to capture market share in a more competitive interest rate environment.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to CTBI, as it obscures the volatility introduced by the CECL provisioning model and the lumpiness of trust fee income, which can lead to distorted earnings perceptions that do not accurately reflect the bank's underlying operational cash flow and long-term stability.
Investors should instead focus on P/TBV and ROE to better assess the bank's value, as these metrics are less sensitive to the accounting-driven fluctuations in credit loss provisions. Relying solely on P/E may lead to an incomplete understanding of the bank's true earnings power and its structural competitive advantages.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CTBI stock.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 13.4x. The historical average is 13.3x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.1x.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.2%. The historical average is 11.5%.
Based on historical data, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 13.4x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.74% with a payout ratio of 36.7%.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. has 66.7% gross margin and 31.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.