Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1216.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -4.2%. (2017–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $198.2B | $113.9B | $97.4B | $71.3B | $24.7B | $41.0B | $47.0B | $13.0B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $193.8B | $109.5B | $93.9B | $68.7B | $23.0B | $39.8B | $45.9B | $12.7B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1216.38 | — | — | 790.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 41.18 | 23.68 | 24.64 | 23.32 | 11.02 | 28.27 | 53.74 | 27.02 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 44.93 | 25.48 | 29.36 | 30.49 | 16.60 | 39.54 | 53.90 | 17.52 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 151.25 | 86.96 | 91.23 | 76.71 | 36.61 | 93.02 | 160.53 | 1044.22 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 122.91 | 70.67 | 70.51 | 61.11 | 26.24 | 71.38 | 131.79 | 130.14 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 22.76 | 23.75 | 22.48 | 10.27 | 27.42 | 52.44 | 26.47 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 1003.95 | 479.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 1161.43 | 462.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 83.60 | 87.93 | 73.93 | 34.13 | 90.25 | 156.64 | 1022.97 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 74.7% | 74.9% | 75.3% | 73.2% | 73.6% | 73.7% | 70.6% | 65.1% | 54.1% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | -6.1% | -3.0% | -0.1% | -8.5% | -9.8% | -10.6% | -30.3% | -54.8% | -110.7% | -171.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3.4% | -3.4% | -0.5% | 2.9% | -8.2% | -16.2% | -10.6% | -29.5% | -56.1% | -114.1% | -173.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -4.2% | -4.2% | -0.7% | 4.7% | -14.5% | -24.6% | -11.5% | -34.9% | -542.3% | — | — |
| ROA | -1.6% | -1.6% | -0.3% | 1.5% | -4.2% | -7.4% | -4.5% | -15.4% | -43.0% | -87.7% | -100.0% |
| ROIC | -351.6% | -351.6% | — | — | — | — | -66.1% | -47.7% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -4.8% | -4.8% | -2.6% | -0.1% | -7.4% | -7.0% | -6.7% | -27.5% | -134.4% | -485.7% | -3911.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.89 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 8.44 | 5.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.99 | -1.06 | -1.10 | -1.12 | -1.18 | -1.31 | -0.36 | -1.26 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -37.79 | -18.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -3.37 | -3.31 | -2.78 | -2.48 | -2.77 | -3.89 | -21.26 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.53 | -3.53 | 3.07 | 5.77 | -5.31 | -5.34 | -55.36 | -315.25 | -323.09 | -80.35 | -147.38 |
Net cash position: cash ($5.2B) exceeds total debt ($820M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.64 | 1.74 | 2.56 | 2.29 | 1.08 | 0.83 | 0.71 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.64 | 1.74 | 2.56 | 2.29 | 1.08 | 0.83 | 0.71 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.29 | 1.28 | 1.42 | 2.22 | 1.85 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.38 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.58 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 103.30 | 104.19 | 101.91 | 101.98 | 92.57 | 99.84 | 125.09 | 135.11 | 183.84 | 170.59 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 2.7% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.0B | $979M | $975M | $933M | $909M | $871M | $852M | $685M | $685M | $685M |
Operational outage liability exposure
According to current market data, CRWD trades at a forward P/E of 141.97 and a P/S of 37.09, suggesting that investors are pricing in significant long-term expansion despite the company's recent revenue growth deceleration and the heightened operational risks following the July 2024 global outage.
The valuation premium relative to peers like Palo Alto Networks suggests the market assigns a higher quality score to CrowdStrike's unified data architecture. However, the lack of a meaningful PEG ratio and the extreme P/E multiple indicate that the current price is highly sensitive to future margin expansion and the successful mitigation of potential litigation costs.
Based on reported financial figures, ROIC has exhibited extreme volatility, swinging from 14.9% in 2026Q4 to -4.6% in 2027Q1, which highlights the difficulty in maintaining efficient capital deployment while simultaneously absorbing large-scale acquisitions and managing the heavy R&D investment required to sustain the platform's competitive edge.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the company is currently in a phase of heavy reinvestment where the benefits of scale are frequently offset by the costs of inorganic growth. Investors should monitor whether ROIC stabilizes as the company integrates recent acquisitions and shifts focus toward operational efficiency over pure market share capture.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's DSO has fluctuated between 65 and 84 days, indicating that while the firm maintains a consistent collection cycle, the timing of large enterprise contract renewals may introduce periodic variability in cash conversion efficiency compared to historical averages.
The relatively stable asset turnover of 0.12 to 0.14 suggests that the company is effectively utilizing its growing asset base to generate revenue, though the reliance on deferred revenue remains a critical component of its working capital health. The absence of DIO data is expected for a software-as-a-service model, shifting the focus entirely to the management of receivables and payables.
According to the latest balance sheet, the company maintains a current ratio of 1.53, which, when combined with a minimal debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18, provides a substantial liquidity cushion to navigate potential SLA credit payouts and legal liabilities arising from the recent global IT outage.
This liquidity position is a structural strength that distinguishes the firm from smaller, more leveraged peers in the cybersecurity space. The ability to self-fund operations and potential remediation costs without tapping debt markets suggests that the company's financial flexibility remains intact despite the recent operational setbacks.
The most commonly misapplied metric for this business model is GAAP net margin, which, at -3.38%, obscures the company's underlying cash-generating power by including significant non-cash stock-based compensation expenses that do not reflect the actual economic reality of the firm's subscription-based cash flow generation.
Analysts should instead prioritize Free Cash Flow (FCF) margins, which have remained robust at over 30% in recent periods, as this better captures the platform's ability to convert recurring revenue into liquidity. Relying on GAAP net income in this context risks underestimating the company's financial health by failing to account for the front-loaded nature of customer acquisition costs.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Wall Street verdict, signals, and target summaries.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CRWD stock.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1216.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -4.2%. The historical average is -12.2%.
Based on historical data, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1216.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. has 74.7% gross margin and -6.1% operating margin.