Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -24.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.8B | $4.6B | $3.6B | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7.6B | $5.4B | $4.0B | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -24.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 21.46 | 14.52 | 7.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 24.61 | 16.64 | 83.79 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 16.86 | 7.75 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 39.22 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 11.9% | 23.7% | 24.6% | 1.3% | 43.9% | 15.6% | 17.7% |
| Operating Margin | -70.4% | -70.4% | -3.8% | 1.8% | -329.5% | 30.6% | -10.5% | -19.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -90.5% | -90.5% | -257.5% | -49.1% | -335.2% | 8.7% | -20.2% | -20.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | -460.7% | 6.4% | -9.1% | -8.8% |
| ROA | -14.6% | -14.6% | -113.8% | -32.4% | -132.2% | 3.6% | -6.3% | -7.4% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | 3.1% | -191.2% | 11.3% | -3.1% | — |
| ROCE | -14.8% | -14.8% | -2.3% | 2.1% | -154.0% | 14.7% | -4.2% | -8.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | 0.61 | 0.30 | 0.06 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 11.89 | 8.21 | — | 4.09 | 13.10 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | 0.52 | 0.24 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 3.60 | 7.73 | — | 3.50 | 10.28 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 16.65 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -34.45 | -1.85 | -21.34 | 2.42 | -1.75 | -49.73 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 | 6.72 | 0.20 | 0.46 | 2.36 | 1.02 | 0.57 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 | 6.72 | 0.20 | 0.46 | 2.36 | 1.02 | 0.57 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 6.21 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.34 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.37 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 0.73 | 5.20 | 2.02 | 1.13 | 6.70 | 1.76 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $318M | $256M | $380M | $341M | $233M | $380M | $380M |
Energy cost volatility exposure
Based on reported financial data, Core Scientific trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 27.10, which appears significantly elevated compared to historical norms and suggests that investors are pricing in a successful transition to high-margin AI hosting rather than current crypto-mining operational realities.
The lack of meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples reflects the company's ongoing struggle to achieve consistent profitability following its restructuring. This valuation premium warrants caution, as it implies a high growth trajectory that may not materialize if the company fails to convert its power capacity into stable, non-mining revenue streams.
According to recent quarterly filings, the company's ROIC of -11.2% in 2025Q1 highlights a fundamental inability to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the cost of its infrastructure-heavy expansion, signaling a period of value destruction rather than compounding.
The negative return profile is largely driven by the massive capital expenditure required to maintain competitive hashrate levels and the high depreciation of specialized hardware. Investors should monitor whether the shift toward HPC hosting can eventually drive ROIC into positive territory, as current levels suggest the business model remains structurally inefficient.
As reported in financial statements, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.04 in 2026Q1, indicating that the massive investment in physical data center infrastructure is not yet being utilized with sufficient efficiency to drive meaningful revenue generation.
The high DPO of 182 days suggests the company may be relying on extended payment terms with suppliers to manage its liquidity, which could pose risks if vendor relationships deteriorate. This inefficiency in asset utilization underscores the difficulty of scaling a capital-intensive mining operation in a competitive global market.
Based on the latest quarterly data, the current ratio has declined to 0.55 in 2026Q1 from 1.15 in 2025Q4, indicating that the company's ability to cover short-term obligations is becoming increasingly constrained as it burns through cash to fund infrastructure growth.
This liquidity profile leaves little room for error, particularly given the company's sensitivity to energy price spikes and Bitcoin volatility. The reliance on current assets to fund operations suggests that any disruption in cash inflows could force the company to seek additional, potentially dilutive, financing.
Market participants frequently over-rely on self-mining hashrate as a primary performance metric, which obscures the reality that Core Scientific's true value lies in its energized power capacity and potential for infrastructure-as-a-service revenue, rather than the volatile output of its mining fleet.
Focusing on hashrate ignores the high energy costs and hardware depreciation that erode margins, whereas evaluating the company as a power-constrained infrastructure provider would better highlight its long-term utility. Analysts should prioritize 'energized megawatts' and 'hosting revenue stability' over raw mining output to better assess the company's fundamental transition.
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CORZ stock.
Core Scientific, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -24.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Core Scientific, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -24.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Core Scientific, Inc. has 11.9% gross margin and -70.4% operating margin.