Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 128.1x · EV/EBITDA 46.3x · ROE 8.7%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.1B | $5.3B | $4.0B | $3.4B | $1.1B | $2.1B | $885M | $416M | $249M | $206M | $116M |
| Enterprise Value | $6.5B | $5.7B | $4.1B | $3.5B | $1.1B | $2.0B | $780M | $380M | $194M | $162M | $97M |
| P/E Ratio → | 128.13 | 102.26 | 33.38 | 43.09 | 13.23 | 34.36 | 40.57 | 20.06 | 13.27 | 14.67 | 25.31 |
| P/S Ratio | 12.37 | 10.71 | 9.29 | 10.75 | 3.30 | 7.69 | 5.68 | 3.11 | 2.02 | 2.20 | 1.06 |
| P/B Ratio | 10.79 | 8.61 | 7.26 | 7.12 | 2.76 | 7.06 | 3.89 | 3.05 | 2.45 | 2.44 | 1.59 |
| P/FCF | 48.13 | 41.69 | 35.56 | 47.60 | 21.35 | 36.44 | 37.90 | 17.81 | 17.10 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 43.25 | 37.46 | 32.62 | 42.74 | 18.32 | 34.01 | 34.35 | 16.90 | 14.82 | 125.82 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 11.40 | 9.48 | 11.01 | 3.46 | 7.52 | 5.01 | 2.83 | 1.57 | 1.73 | 0.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 46.28 | 40.41 | 34.26 | 48.76 | 12.97 | 27.53 | 31.38 | 15.75 | 8.81 | — | 11.27 |
| EV / EBIT | 50.53 | 108.08 | 30.74 | 39.12 | 12.44 | 28.04 | 33.12 | 17.28 | 9.68 | — | 33.43 |
| EV / FCF | — | 44.37 | 36.28 | 48.74 | 22.39 | 35.66 | 33.42 | 16.25 | 13.32 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 50.5% | 48.9% | 46.8% | 49.8% | 50.9% | 47.0% | 48.3% | 49.4% | 48.7% | 44.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | 25.8% | 25.2% | 20.7% | 25.4% | 26.3% | 14.5% | 16.4% | 16.3% | -3.2% | 6.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.2% | 10.2% | 27.6% | 24.9% | 24.9% | 22.4% | 14.0% | 16.4% | 15.2% | 14.9% | 4.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 23.1% | 18.3% | 23.6% | 23.1% | 12.0% | 18.5% | 20.2% | 17.7% | 6.7% |
| ROA | 4.7% | 4.7% | 14.1% | 10.7% | 12.7% | 13.8% | 9.5% | 14.1% | 14.7% | 12.8% | 4.3% |
| ROIC | 12.1% | 12.1% | 13.7% | 9.9% | 17.9% | 28.6% | 15.2% | 22.5% | 34.5% | -4.8% | 10.9% |
| ROCE | 13.4% | 13.4% | 14.8% | 10.2% | 15.0% | 19.5% | 12.2% | 18.2% | 21.4% | -3.8% | 8.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.71 | 3.71 | 1.74 | 2.83 | 2.33 | 2.68 | 0.06 | 0.07 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.55 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.13 | -0.15 | -0.46 | -0.27 | -0.54 | -0.52 | -0.27 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.44 | 2.44 | 0.68 | 1.14 | 0.60 | -0.60 | -4.20 | -1.51 | -2.50 | — | -2.30 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.68 | 0.72 | 1.14 | 1.03 | -0.78 | -4.47 | -1.56 | -3.78 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 120.96 | 50.55 | 81.61 | 165.97 | 151.96 | — | — | -244.15 | 2.91 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.35 | 8.35 | 5.00 | 5.66 | 6.29 | 5.80 | 4.56 | 4.67 | 3.04 | 3.28 | 2.71 |
| Quick Ratio | 7.31 | 7.31 | 4.11 | 4.77 | 5.55 | 5.14 | 3.87 | 3.92 | 2.27 | 2.51 | 1.90 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.22 | 6.22 | 3.13 | 3.66 | 4.52 | 4.44 | 3.10 | 2.83 | 1.40 | 1.57 | 0.63 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 1.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.19 | 2.19 | 1.97 | 1.95 | 2.46 | 2.25 | 2.08 | 2.91 | 2.07 | 2.25 | 2.38 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 66.83 | 97.11 | 115.01 | 99.17 | 82.45 | 101.82 | 91.69 | 98.04 | 92.77 | 79.34 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 1.5% | — | — | — | — | 1.6% | 2.0% | 2.4% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 50.7% | — | — | — | — | 29.8% | 27.0% | 35.8% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.8% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 2.3% | 7.6% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 5.0% | 7.5% | 6.8% | 4.0% |
| FCF Yield | 2.1% | 2.4% | 2.8% | 2.1% | 4.7% | 2.7% | 2.6% | 5.6% | 5.8% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $49M | $49M | $48M | $45M | $40M | $38M | $37M | $36M | $35M |
Geopolitical and concentration exposure
Based on current market data, Camtek trades at a forward P/E of 43.88, which suggests that investors are pricing in significant long-term earnings growth relative to the broader semiconductor equipment sector, despite the inherent volatility associated with its project-based revenue model and geographic concentration in Asia.
The elevated P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples indicate that the market views Camtek as a critical bottleneck provider for AI-related packaging rather than a standard cyclical equipment vendor. While these multiples appear rich compared to historical averages, they may be justified if the company sustains its current margin expansion and captures a larger share of the HBM inspection market.
According to reported financial figures, Camtek's ROIC has remained in a modest 3.0% to 4.1% range over the last ten quarters, which appears surprisingly low given the company's strong operating margins and suggests that the capital base is growing faster than the incremental returns generated by recent investments.
The divergence between high operating margins and low ROIC warrants further investigation into the company's asset intensity and the efficiency of its R&D spending. It is possible that the accumulation of cash and inventory is suppressing return metrics, masking the underlying profitability of the core inspection platform business.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, Camtek's cash conversion cycle remains elevated at 215 days in 2025Q2, primarily driven by a high days-inventory-outstanding figure of 197 days, which suggests that the company maintains significant inventory levels to mitigate supply chain risks and ensure rapid delivery for key customers.
The extended CCC indicates that Camtek is carrying a substantial amount of working capital, which may be a strategic necessity given the complexity of its inspection systems and the lead times for specialized components. Investors should monitor whether this inventory buildup reflects anticipated demand or a potential risk of obsolescence if product cycles shift rapidly.
Based on a comparison with industry peers like Onto Innovation and ACM Research, Camtek maintains a distinct margin profile that reflects its specialized focus on the middle-end of semiconductor manufacturing, positioning it as a premium player compared to traditional back-end testing companies that often struggle with profitability.
While peers like Cohu and Ichor exhibit significant volatility or negative margins, Camtek’s ability to maintain consistent profitability suggests a more defensible competitive moat. The valuation gap between Camtek and its peers appears to be a structural reflection of its critical role in the HBM supply chain, which is less susceptible to the commoditization seen in standard testing equipment.
The most commonly misapplied metric for Camtek is the standard P/E ratio, which obscures the company's transition from a cyclical back-end equipment provider to a structural growth play in the AI-driven semiconductor packaging market, leading to an incomplete assessment of its long-term earnings power.
Investors should instead focus on 'inspection intensity' per wafer or the growth in HBM layer counts, as these metrics better capture the company's fundamental value drivers. Relying solely on trailing P/E multiples fails to account for the non-linear growth potential inherent in the company's specialized metrology and inspection platforms.
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CAMT stock.
Camtek Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 128.1x. The historical average is 28.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Camtek Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 46.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.8x.
Camtek Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.7%. The historical average is 7.4%.
Based on historical data, Camtek Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 128.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Camtek Ltd. has 50.5% gross margin and 25.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Camtek Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.