Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -32.7%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23M | $24M | $75M | $17M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $19M | $20M | $58M | $11M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.48 | 7.88 | 24.35 | 5.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.47 | 1.55 | 3.54 | 1.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.59 | 19.06 | 3.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 89.7% | 89.7% | 92.2% | 96.7% | 96.6% | 97.3% | 97.0% | 97.2% | 48.0% | 71.1% | 70.6% |
| Operating Margin | -208.6% | -208.6% | -104.9% | -30.2% | -36.0% | -12.9% | -52.5% | -79.5% | 22.0% | 24.9% | 22.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -194.6% | -194.6% | -109.4% | -23.9% | -43.6% | -28.8% | -77.4% | -96.2% | 28.7% | 7.3% | 2.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -32.7% | -32.7% | -21.4% | -14.2% | — | -111.8% | -101.9% | -0.3% | 6.4% | 1.7% | 0.5% |
| ROA | -31.0% | -31.0% | -19.9% | -7.9% | -19.5% | -14.0% | -30.3% | -0.1% | 3.2% | 0.9% | 0.3% |
| ROIC | -58.2% | -58.2% | -50.8% | -31.3% | — | -38.7% | -53.0% | -0.2% | 3.7% | 4.4% | 3.7% |
| ROCE | -34.9% | -34.9% | -20.3% | -11.2% | -19.7% | -7.8% | -25.2% | -0.1% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.01 | 0.05 | — | 1.12 | 0.86 | 0.41 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.25 | -0.77 | -0.55 | — | -1.15 | 0.37 | -0.16 | -0.02 | -0.01 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.12 | -0.09 | -0.06 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -0.92 | — | — | — | -1.25 | -0.20 |
| Interest Coverage | -132.44 | -132.44 | -27.51 | -2.20 | -7.42 | -14.25 | -18.70 | — | 1.03 | -0.57 | -0.88 |
Net cash position: cash ($4M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 13.15 | 13.15 | 17.77 | 6.70 | 1.42 | 1.40 | 1.79 | 2.26 | — | — | — |
| Quick Ratio | 13.15 | 13.15 | 17.77 | 6.70 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.76 | 2.26 | — | — | — |
| Cash Ratio | 12.55 | 12.55 | 17.05 | 5.99 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.48 | 1.18 | — | — | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 3.06 | 2.73 | 2.85 | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.38 | 60.28 | 74.91 | 74.07 | 98.55 | 183.30 | 132.19 | 7.92 | 4.82 | 3.17 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16M | $15M | $11M | $3M | $3M | $20M | $3M | $207M | $186M | $156M |
Imminent liquidity and scaling
Based on reported financial data, BMR trades at a P/S multiple of 7.83, which appears disconnected from its stagnant 0.98% YoY revenue growth and suggests that investors are pricing in significant future optionality rather than current fundamental performance or near-term cash flow generation.
The current valuation multiple implies a high growth expectation that the company's recent income statements fail to support. Investors should monitor whether this premium is sustained by technical partnerships or if it faces a sharp correction as the market reconciles the lack of commercial scaling with the company's high-margin but low-volume revenue profile.
As reported in recent financial statements, BMR maintains a robust gross margin of 90.8%, yet this structural advantage is entirely offset by an operating margin of -149.9%, indicating that the company's earning power is currently non-existent due to excessive fixed R&D and personnel costs.
The delta between gross and operating margins highlights a business model that is highly scalable in theory but currently trapped in a high-burn R&D phase. This suggests that the company's true earning power remains latent, requiring a massive increase in revenue to amortize its fixed cost base before profitability can be achieved.
According to historical data, BMR's ROIC has trended into deeply negative territory, reaching -19.1% in 2025Q4, which demonstrates that the company is currently destroying shareholder capital rather than compounding it through its proprietary video optimization technology and licensing activities.
The persistent negative return on invested capital suggests that the capital deployed into R&D is not yet generating sufficient economic returns to justify the investment. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's patent portfolio can eventually drive a pivot toward high-margin royalty streams or if the current capital allocation strategy will continue to erode equity value.
Based on reported figures, BMR's asset turnover remains extremely low at 0.11, reflecting a significant underutilization of the asset base and suggesting that the company's current infrastructure is not yet optimized for the volume of licensing activity required to reach operational break-even.
The low asset turnover, combined with the lack of meaningful inventory or complex working capital cycles, indicates that the company's primary constraint is not operational efficiency but rather a lack of market penetration. Investors should monitor whether the recent integration with NVIDIA's hardware ecosystem can improve these turnover metrics by providing a more efficient distribution channel for the company's software keys.
Market participants often misapply the 90% gross margin as a proxy for business quality, which obscures the reality that BMR is a sub-scale R&D entity where the most relevant metric is actually the cash burn rate relative to the remaining liquidity runway.
Focusing on gross margins in this context is misleading because it ignores the massive fixed-cost burden required to maintain the company's competitive technical edge. A more appropriate adjustment would be to evaluate the company's 'cash-burn-to-revenue' ratio, which provides a clearer picture of the sustainability of the current business model and the urgency of the need for additional financing.
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BMR stock.
Beamr Imaging Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -3.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Beamr Imaging Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -32.7%. The historical average is -17.0%.
Based on historical data, Beamr Imaging Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -3.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Beamr Imaging Ltd. has 89.7% gross margin and -208.6% operating margin.