Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 126.5x · EV/EBITDA 10.1x · ROE 2.1%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $560M | $341M | $301M | $381M | $352M | $459M | $170M | $200M | $295M | $280M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $957M | $738M | $658M | $781M | $792M | $821M | $531M | $599M | $295M | $503M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 126.54 | 72.78 | 21.35 | 13.02 | 13.64 | — | — | — | 10.43 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.43 | 0.87 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 1.45 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 1.21 | 1.33 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.04 | 1.18 | 0.94 | 1.24 | 1.26 | 1.75 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 58.96 | 56.06 | — |
| P/FCF | 31.94 | 19.44 | 6.99 | 9.16 | — | 37.37 | 4.30 | — | 37.41 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 8.71 | 5.30 | 3.46 | 3.93 | 4.58 | 6.06 | 2.16 | 6.53 | 7.44 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.88 | 1.54 | 1.77 | 1.97 | 2.60 | 1.74 | 2.12 | 1.21 | 2.38 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.06 | 7.76 | 6.18 | 6.22 | 7.11 | 8.73 | 17.73 | 7.12 | 4.50 | 19.22 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 23.04 | 17.76 | 13.11 | 11.37 | 13.18 | 21.39 | — | 20.81 | 7.37 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 42.09 | 15.27 | 18.79 | — | 66.75 | 13.39 | — | 37.45 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 38.5% | 38.9% | 40.3% | 40.8% | 43.6% | 45.1% | 44.3% | 43.7% | 42.5% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 10.6% | 11.6% | 13.9% | 12.5% | 12.0% | -10.4% | 10.2% | 16.4% | -0.5% | 20.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | 3.8% | 7.2% | 7.1% | -4.8% | -20.1% | -11.5% | 11.7% | -0.2% | 2.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.1% | 2.1% | 5.1% | 10.8% | 10.6% | -5.7% | -21.0% | -20.2% | 567.6% | -1.5% | 9.3% |
| ROA | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.8% | 3.5% | 3.4% | -1.9% | -7.4% | -5.9% | 11.9% | -0.1% | 1.4% |
| ROIC | 4.6% | 4.6% | 5.3% | 6.5% | 5.6% | 4.6% | -3.5% | 6.0% | 25.7% | -0.4% | 14.4% |
| ROCE | 5.0% | 5.0% | 5.9% | 7.7% | 6.6% | 5.2% | -4.3% | 5.7% | 17.2% | -0.4% | 15.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.24 | 1.35 | 1.60 | 1.41 | 1.37 | 1.28 | 0.07 | 44.71 | 3.95 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.64 | 4.64 | 3.76 | 3.31 | 4.02 | 3.94 | 12.26 | 4.82 | 0.01 | 8.54 | 2.58 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.37 | 1.11 | 1.30 | 1.58 | 1.38 | 1.35 | 1.26 | 0.07 | 44.54 | 3.86 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.18 | 4.18 | 3.35 | 3.19 | 3.95 | 3.84 | 12.04 | 4.73 | 0.01 | 8.51 | 2.52 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 22.65 | 8.28 | 9.63 | — | 29.38 | 9.09 | — | 0.04 | — | 10.87 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.94 | 2.44 | 2.32 | 1.52 | -0.92 | 0.79 | 1.87 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.17 | 2.17 | 1.99 | 1.12 | 0.74 | 1.40 | 0.96 | 0.68 | 0.07 | 1.52 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.89 | 1.04 | 0.69 | 1.30 | 0.89 | 0.62 | -0.28 | -2.64 | 0.97 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.15 | 0.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 0.68 |
| Inventory Turnover | 32.59 | 32.59 | 43.91 | 39.21 | 42.96 | 36.33 | 36.07 | 29.98 | 35.93 | 40.35 | 55.43 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 49.36 | 48.37 | 51.98 | 57.64 | 56.99 | 55.11 | 60.18 | 60.20 | — | 52.65 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 9.0% | 15.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.7% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 833.7% | 833.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.8% | 1.4% | 4.7% | 7.7% | 7.3% | — | — | — | 9.6% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.1% | 5.1% | 14.3% | 10.9% | — | 2.7% | 23.3% | — | 2.7% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.5% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 12.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 11.5% | 19.8% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 12.4% | 0.0% | 1.7% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $53M | $54M | $54M | $55M | $53M | $53M | $58M | $29M | $29M | $8M |
High Fixed Cost Leverage
Based on current market data, BBCP trades at a trailing P/E of 132.00, which appears disconnected from its underlying earnings volatility and suggests investors are pricing in a recovery that remains inconsistent with the reported -7.75% revenue decline observed in recent periods.
The elevated valuation multiples relative to the company's narrow net margins imply that the market is assigning a growth premium that the current operational performance does not yet justify. Investors should monitor whether the forward EV/EBITDA of 8.38 provides a more realistic floor, or if the lack of consistent profitability will force a valuation compression toward peer averages.
As reported in quarterly financial statements, BBCP's ROIC has struggled to exceed 2.1% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the company is currently failing to generate returns on invested capital that meaningfully exceed its likely cost of capital in this high-interest environment.
The persistent low ROIC suggests that the capital-intensive nature of the 820-unit boom pump fleet is not being adequately offset by operational efficiency. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's historical acquisition strategy has resulted in an over-capitalized asset base that drags down overall return metrics.
According to the provided quarterly data, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated between 39 and 53 days, reflecting the inherent difficulty in managing receivables and payables within a project-based construction service model that is highly sensitive to seasonal demand and general contractor payment cycles.
The variability in DSO, which peaked at 53 days, suggests that BBCP may lack sufficient leverage over its Tier-1 general contractor customers to enforce tighter payment terms. This inefficiency forces the company to rely more heavily on external financing to bridge the gap between service delivery and cash collection.
Based on reported figures, the company's debt-to-EBITDA ratio has reached as high as 26.65 in recent quarters, signaling that the current capital structure is under significant stress and leaves little room for operational errors or further revenue contraction in the core pumping segments.
The interest coverage ratio, which has dipped as low as 0.25, indicates that debt service is becoming increasingly precarious and may limit management's ability to invest in fleet modernization. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance existing obligations without further diluting equity or sacrificing long-term growth initiatives.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to BBCP, as it obscures the massive non-cash depreciation charges inherent in an asset-heavy service model, leading to an artificially inflated valuation that fails to capture the company's true cash-generating capacity and underlying operational health.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to better understand the company's ability to service its debt and maintain its specialized fleet. Relying on P/E in this context ignores the significant gap between GAAP net income and the actual cash flow available to shareholders after accounting for mandatory capital expenditures.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BBCP stock.
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 126.5x. The historical average is 26.2x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.4x.
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 2.1%. The historical average is -1.2%.
Based on historical data, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 126.5x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 8.97% with a payout ratio of 833.7%.
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. has 38.5% gross margin and 10.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.