Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 123.3x · EV/EBITDA 75.6x · ROE 7.4%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.5B | $2.0B | $2.8B | $1.6B | $2.5B | $4.3B | $5.6B | $3.2B | $5.4B | $6.6B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.4B | $2.0B | $2.8B | $1.7B | $2.6B | $4.6B | $6.3B | $3.6B | $5.5B | $6.6B | $3.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 123.33 | 37.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 58.00 | 16.41 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 11.66 | 3.63 | 5.21 | 2.17 | 4.71 | 6.04 | 6.32 | 3.05 | 5.93 | 7.11 | 2.79 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.89 | 2.72 | 3.87 | 2.12 | 2.90 | 2.79 | 3.75 | 1.26 | 2.03 | 2.65 | 1.78 |
| P/FCF | 137.66 | 42.87 | 435.28 | — | — | — | 148.45 | — | 105.16 | 10.06 | — |
| P/OCF | 127.26 | 39.63 | 168.84 | — | — | — | 68.79 | 122.16 | 53.63 | 9.41 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.52 | 5.16 | 2.27 | 5.00 | 6.35 | 7.02 | 3.42 | 6.06 | 7.07 | 2.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 75.60 | 23.06 | 60.62 | 24.81 | — | — | — | 56.45 | 26.22 | 14.33 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 95.95 | 29.77 | 190.22 | 48.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 41.61 | 430.96 | — | — | — | 165.00 | — | 107.46 | 10.00 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 74.1% | 73.8% | 64.6% | 69.7% | 65.0% | 72.0% | 73.4% | 77.2% | 71.9% | 47.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 12.0% | 0.1% | 1.4% | -39.3% | -29.8% | -124.0% | -14.3% | 6.6% | 30.4% | -90.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.7% | 9.7% | -14.8% | -17.2% | -139.5% | 1.7% | -123.6% | -14.6% | 10.3% | 43.5% | -92.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.4% | 7.4% | -10.6% | -15.9% | -60.9% | 0.8% | -54.7% | -5.9% | 3.6% | 17.8% | -45.8% |
| ROA | 4.3% | 4.3% | -5.9% | -8.5% | -34.6% | 0.4% | -32.9% | -3.9% | 2.4% | 11.5% | -27.4% |
| ROIC | 7.3% | 7.3% | 0.1% | 0.9% | -11.1% | -8.2% | -32.9% | -3.9% | 1.7% | 9.7% | -32.6% |
| ROCE | 7.0% | 7.0% | 0.1% | 1.1% | -13.3% | -9.4% | -42.9% | -4.8% | 1.8% | 9.4% | -33.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.29 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.52 | 2.52 | 5.25 | 3.63 | — | — | — | 12.02 | 3.18 | 1.70 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.08 | -0.04 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.15 | 0.04 | -0.01 | -0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.70 | -0.70 | -0.61 | 1.11 | — | — | — | 6.03 | 0.56 | -0.07 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.26 | -4.33 | — | — | — | 16.55 | — | 2.29 | -0.05 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 10.83 | 10.83 | 2.42 | 6.32 | -30.53 | -36.09 | -6.20 | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($275M) exceeds total debt ($215M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.12 | 2.12 | 1.72 | 1.42 | 1.02 | 2.63 | 2.34 | 1.07 | 2.34 | 6.20 | 2.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.12 | 2.12 | 1.72 | 1.42 | 1.02 | 2.63 | 2.34 | 1.07 | 2.34 | 6.19 | 2.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.98 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 1.79 | 1.72 | 0.81 | 1.80 | 5.50 | 2.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.40 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 87.33 | 26.62 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 108.63 | 152.65 | 107.56 | 93.63 | 87.44 | 88.70 | 82.48 | 105.38 | 97.12 | 71.94 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.8% | 2.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.7% | 6.1% | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.7% | 2.3% | 0.2% | — | — | — | 0.7% | — | 1.0% | 9.9% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.9% | 3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.9% | 3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $598M | $591M | $592M | $639M | $631M | $561M | $614M | $616M | $546M | $525M |
Automotive production cycle sensitivity
Based on current market data, BlackBerry trades at a P/S ratio of 11.97 and a forward P/E of 76.92, which appears to price in significant future growth that remains inconsistent with the company's historical revenue trajectory and ongoing transition toward a standalone software-centric business model.
The elevated valuation multiples suggest that investors are assigning a premium for the potential of the IVY platform and the strategic separation of business units. However, given the lack of a clear PEG ratio and the volatility in earnings, these multiples appear disconnected from the current reality of a company still struggling to demonstrate consistent operating leverage.
As reported in financial statements, ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, fluctuating between a low of -5.0% in 2024Q4 and a modest 3.0% in 2026Q4, indicating that the company is currently failing to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital.
The inability to consistently compound returns on invested capital highlights the challenges of integrating past acquisitions while maintaining high R&D spend. Investors should monitor whether the separation of the IoT and Cybersecurity segments can improve capital allocation efficiency by allowing each unit to focus on its specific return profile.
According to the provided quarterly data, the company's asset turnover remains stagnant at approximately 0.13, while DSO levels have remained elevated above 100 days, suggesting that the firm faces structural difficulties in converting its software-based revenue into timely cash inflows compared to industry peers.
The persistent length of the collection cycle implies that the company may be offering extended payment terms to secure design wins in the competitive automotive and government sectors. This inefficiency ties up capital that could otherwise be deployed toward R&D or strategic growth initiatives, further straining the cash conversion cycle.
Based on recent filings, the current ratio has improved significantly to 2.94 as of 2027Q1, providing a robust liquidity cushion that protects the company against the inherent volatility of its automotive-linked royalty revenue streams and the costs associated with its ongoing corporate restructuring.
This strong liquidity position is a critical defensive feature, allowing the company to navigate periods of cyclical downturns in vehicle production without the need for external financing. While this provides stability, the market may be under-appreciating the opportunity cost of holding such high levels of liquid assets instead of deploying them for growth.
The most commonly misapplied metric for this business is headline revenue growth, which obscures the underlying shift from legacy service access fees to recurring software subscriptions and IoT royalties, thereby masking the true quality and sustainability of the company's evolving earnings profile.
Analysts should instead focus on Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and the QNX royalty backlog, as these metrics provide a more accurate reflection of the company's long-term competitive position. Relying on headline revenue growth often leads to an inaccurate assessment of the business's health, as it fails to account for the intentional divestiture of non-core, lumpy revenue streams.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BB stock.
BlackBerry Limited's current P/E ratio is 123.3x. The historical average is 46.2x. This places it at the 92th percentile of its historical range.
BlackBerry Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 75.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 28.5x.
BlackBerry Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 7.4%. The historical average is -1.9%.
Based on historical data, BlackBerry Limited is trading at a P/E of 123.3x. This is at the 92th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BlackBerry Limited has 74.1% gross margin and 12.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
BlackBerry Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.