Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -72.4%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $225M | $243M | $80M | $3M | $47M | $177M | $194M | $308M | $112M | $60M | $8M |
| Enterprise Value | $212M | $230M | $-53852605 | $-4350684 | $54M | $156M | $175M | $305M | $117M | $58M | $5M |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.06 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3820.86 | 4125.96 | 181.69 | 1.31 | 2.63 | 32.83 | 28.95 | 45.65 | 6.13 | 2.16 | 6.74 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.22 | 2.93 | 0.60 | 0.35 | — | 7.68 | 7.90 | 14.68 | 5.37 | 2.15 | 37.54 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.80 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.79 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3898.32 | -122.11 | -2.26 | 3.00 | 28.89 | 26.19 | 45.13 | 6.39 | 2.07 | 4.33 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.02 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.14 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.60 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | 183.0% | 33.3% | 81.0% | 72.4% | 95.5% | 108.4% | 59.2% | 97.7% | -614.6% |
| Operating Margin | -123601.7% | -123601.7% | -15535.6% | -1421.6% | -207.4% | -1521.6% | — | -239.1% | -214.5% | 49.9% | -1394.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -132642.4% | -132642.4% | -7965.8% | -1639.5% | -230.8% | -1563.1% | -947.9% | -238.1% | -218.5% | 42.7% | -1428.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -72.4% | -72.4% | -50.1% | -431.9% | -684.8% | -354.2% | -278.8% | -76.7% | -164.3% | 84.6% | -247.9% |
| ROA | -58.6% | -58.6% | -40.9% | -116.1% | -73.4% | -136.1% | -159.0% | -30.2% | -70.7% | 48.6% | -120.1% |
| ROIC | -159.3% | -159.3% | — | -4815.3% | — | -1562.7% | — | -56.1% | -115.6% | 91.3% | — |
| ROCE | -59.0% | -59.0% | -85.6% | -198.0% | -104.6% | -184.9% | — | -47.5% | -103.8% | 83.7% | -186.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.07 | — | 1.44 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.74 | — | 11.37 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.16 | -1.01 | -0.94 | — | -0.92 | -0.75 | -0.16 | 0.23 | -0.09 | -13.40 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.17 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.20 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | -6.86 | -8.98 | -34.35 | — | — | — | 578.36 | -34.64 |
Net cash position: cash ($16M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.14 | 8.14 | 19.96 | 1.82 | 0.74 | 3.11 | 1.71 | 1.46 | 0.84 | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| Quick Ratio | 8.14 | 8.14 | 19.96 | 1.82 | 0.74 | 3.11 | 1.71 | 1.46 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 1.31 |
| Cash Ratio | 7.60 | 7.60 | 19.33 | 1.61 | 0.60 | 2.74 | 1.24 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.22 | 1.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.54 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.64 | 0.20 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 171.70 | 39.24 | 100.00 | -26.55 | 6.73 | 1.66 | 749.00 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 505.70 | 25.80 | 38.80 | 324.50 | 238.92 | 283.45 | 121.18 | 38.52 | 41.94 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.8% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $11M | $277727 | $39202 | $36191 | $25511 | $19849 | $12074 | $6512 | $3066 |
Imminent liquidity and dilution
As reported in recent financial statements, Avalo’s price-to-sales ratio of 3483.95 is mathematically extreme and largely irrelevant, as the company lacks a commercial revenue base, suggesting that market valuation is driven entirely by speculative probability of clinical success rather than fundamental earnings or historical growth metrics.
The P/B ratio of 2.94 indicates that investors are paying a premium for the company's intellectual property and pipeline potential rather than its tangible book value. This valuation appears highly sensitive to capital market sentiment, as the lack of earnings makes traditional P/E or EV/EBITDA analysis inapplicable for assessing the firm's intrinsic value.
Based on the provided financial data, the company’s ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -27.2% in 2026Q1, which highlights the structural inability of the current pipeline to generate returns on invested capital while the firm continues to prioritize high-cost clinical development over operational efficiency or profitability.
The persistent decay in ROIC reflects the heavy reliance on external funding to sustain R&D activities that have yet to yield a commercial product. Investors should monitor whether future clinical milestones can reverse this trend, as the current trajectory suggests significant value destruction for shareholders through ongoing capital consumption.
According to recent quarterly filings, the company's efficiency metrics are heavily impacted by clinical trial payment cycles, with DPO figures reaching 1305 days in 2026Q1, indicating that the firm is managing its limited cash by extending payment terms to vendors and clinical research organizations to preserve liquidity.
The extreme DPO levels suggest that Avalo is under significant pressure to manage its cash conversion cycle, likely at the expense of its relationships with service providers. This reliance on extended credit terms may indicate a lack of operational flexibility and a heightened risk of disruption if vendors demand more favorable payment conditions.
As reported in financial statements, the company maintains a low D/E ratio of 0.03, which appears to be a function of limited access to traditional debt markets rather than a deliberate strategy to avoid leverage, given the firm's reliance on dilutive equity financing to fund its operations.
While the low debt load might appear favorable, it masks the reality that the company lacks the cash flow to service any meaningful debt obligations. The absence of interest coverage highlights that the firm's survival is entirely dependent on equity markets, leaving it vulnerable to shifts in investor appetite for high-risk biotech.
Investors frequently misapply standard profitability ratios like net margin to Avalo, which, as shown in recent filings, reached -232.5% in 2025Q4, obscuring the fact that these figures are artifacts of pre-revenue clinical development rather than indicators of operational failure or a lack of future commercial viability.
Using net margin to evaluate a clinical-stage biotech is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the long-term nature of R&D investment. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the cash burn rate relative to the clinical trial runway, which provides a clearer picture of the firm's solvency and financing needs.
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AVTX stock.
Avalo Therapeutics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -3.4x. The historical average is 5.1x.
Avalo Therapeutics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -72.4%. The historical average is -163.2%.
Based on historical data, Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -3.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Avalo Therapeutics, Inc. has 100.0% gross margin and -123601.7% operating margin.