VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial AnalysisFree US Stock Screener
ScreenerThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistInsider
ScreenerThemes
Earnings
WatchlistInsider
AVO
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Verify deeply. Act with conviction.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly stock ideas — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTerms
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerNewsCompareWatchlist
AVOMission Produce, Inc.
$12.49$883M
Overview & Verdict
Overview
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice HistoryTechnical Analysis
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Ownership
Holders
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. AVO
  4. Financial Ratios

Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.6x · EV/EBITDA 9.6x · ROE 6.3%. (2018–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

AVO Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Market Cap$883M$822M$840M$666M$1.2B$1.3B$931M——
Enterprise Value$1.0B$958M$999M$876M$1.3B$1.5B$985M——
P/E Ratio →23.5721.7422.69——30.1432.17——
P/S Ratio0.630.590.680.701.121.511.08——
P/B Ratio1.441.331.461.262.252.531.97——
P/FCF23.7222.0913.73———80.22——
P/OCF9.969.278.9922.8033.4028.7111.79——

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

AVO EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
EV / Revenue—0.690.810.921.281.661.14——
EV / EBITDA9.609.039.6722.05—17.2711.39——
EV / EBIT14.2513.4313.6981.83—21.2114.40——
EV / FCF—25.7516.33———84.93——

AVO Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Gross Margin11.6%11.6%12.4%8.7%8.6%14.0%14.4%17.5%6.3%
Operating Margin5.1%5.1%5.3%0.7%-3.6%6.8%7.9%12.1%2.2%
Net Profit Margin2.7%2.7%3.0%-0.3%-3.3%5.0%3.3%8.1%8.4%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
ROE6.3%6.3%6.6%-0.5%-6.5%8.9%6.8%20.7%23.1%
ROA3.9%3.9%3.9%-0.3%-3.9%5.4%3.9%10.9%11.6%
ROIC7.2%7.2%6.7%0.7%-4.1%7.7%10.0%16.1%2.9%
ROCE8.6%8.6%8.0%0.9%-4.8%8.2%10.4%18.3%3.4%

AVO Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Debt / Equity0.320.320.380.480.410.400.380.490.65
Debt / EBITDA1.891.892.106.37—2.492.061.517.24
Net Debt / Equity—0.220.280.400.310.240.120.320.57
Net Debt / EBITDA1.281.281.545.28—1.500.630.996.30
Debt / FCF—3.662.60———4.711.9432.24
Interest Coverage7.597.595.790.92-4.6718.8410.2110.3017.42

AVO Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Current Ratio1.951.951.872.262.242.773.182.592.30
Quick Ratio1.351.351.261.531.522.232.692.031.82
Cash Ratio0.480.480.390.440.520.951.590.810.39
Asset Turnover—1.421.271.041.191.021.111.281.38
Inventory Turnover15.2715.2711.8712.3013.0815.9219.1116.2324.94
Days Sales Outstanding—27.9735.2133.1022.9635.2431.2435.9936.82

AVO Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Dividend Yield——————1.4%——
Payout Ratio——————45.1%7.8%6.2%

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Earnings Yield4.2%4.6%4.4%——3.3%3.1%——
FCF Yield4.2%4.5%7.3%———1.2%——
Buyback Yield0.7%0.7%0.1%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.2%——
Total Shareholder Yield0.7%0.7%0.1%0.1%0.0%0.0%1.6%——
Shares Outstanding—$71M$71M$71M$71M$71M$71M$71M$69M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeContracting
ProfitabilityNegative
Balance SheetHealthy
Cash FlowDeteriorating
Top Statement Risk

Commodity price volatility exposure

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q2)

Valuation Multiples Reflect Earnings Uncertainty

According to current market data, Mission Produce trades at a TTM P/E of 23.13 and a P/S of 0.62, which suggests that investors are pricing in a recovery despite the recent contraction in profitability and the significant volatility in quarterly earnings reported in recent SEC filings.

The forward P/E of 19.93 implies that the market anticipates a return to positive earnings, yet the PEG ratio of 4.39 indicates that this valuation is expensive relative to the company's current growth trajectory. Investors should monitor whether these multiples compress further if the company fails to demonstrate a clear path back to historical margin levels.

Capital Returns Decay Amidst Expansion

Based on reported financial statements, ROIC has deteriorated to -0.1% in 2026Q2 from a peak of 3.3% in 2025Q4, indicating that the company's heavy investment in international farming assets is currently failing to generate returns that exceed the cost of capital during this cyclical downturn.

The decline in ROIC suggests that the capital-intensive nature of orchard development in Peru is creating a drag on performance when harvest yields or market prices are unfavorable. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's long-term strategy of vertical integration is creating sustainable value or merely increasing fixed-cost exposure.

Working Capital Efficiency Under Pressure

As reported in recent quarterly filings, the cash conversion cycle has extended to 57 days in 2026Q2, up from 41 days in 2025Q2, which suggests that the company is facing increased difficulty in managing inventory turnover and collecting receivables during the current period of market weakness.

The rise in DIO to 36 days indicates that perishable inventory is lingering longer than optimal, which increases the risk of spoilage and margin erosion. This inefficiency in working capital management appears to be a structural challenge that exacerbates the company's liquidity constraints during periods of low demand.

Conservative Leverage Provides Safety Net

According to the latest balance sheet data, Mission Produce maintains a disciplined debt-to-equity ratio of 0.36, which provides a significant buffer against the current operational losses and suggests that the company remains well-positioned to avoid immediate refinancing risks despite the recent deterioration in interest coverage.

While the interest coverage ratio has turned negative at -0.32 in 2026Q2, the low absolute debt levels suggest that the company is not currently facing a solvency crisis. Investors should monitor whether management continues to prioritize this conservative capital structure if the need for additional liquidity arises to fund ongoing operations.

Misapplication of Traditional Distribution Metrics

Market participants frequently misapply standard distribution P/E multiples to Mission Produce, which obscures the reality that the company functions as a high-operating-leverage agricultural producer rather than a simple logistics provider, as evidenced by the extreme sensitivity of margins to biological asset yields and harvest cycles.

Using P/E as the primary valuation tool ignores the lumpy nature of farming income and the non-cash accounting complexities of biological assets. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA and per-box margin metrics to better capture the underlying operational performance of the company's vertically integrated model.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily

Consensus-Based Analysis Tools

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

DCA Calculator

See how regular investing compounds over time.

Run Numbers

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

AVO — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AVO stock.

What is Mission Produce, Inc.'s P/E ratio?

Mission Produce, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 23.6x. The historical average is 26.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.

What is Mission Produce, Inc.'s EV/EBITDA?

Mission Produce, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.9x.

What is Mission Produce, Inc.'s ROE?

Mission Produce, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.3%. The historical average is 8.2%.

Is AVO stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Mission Produce, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 23.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Mission Produce, Inc.'s profit margins?

Mission Produce, Inc. has 11.6% gross margin and 5.1% operating margin.

How much debt does Mission Produce, Inc. have?

Mission Produce, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.9x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.